Browse > Article

Development and Validation of Korean MHBT for Identification of Giftedness  

Lim, Kyung-Hee (Sunchon National University)
Son, Seung-Nam (Sunchon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.18, no.3, 2008 , pp. 371-400 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to develop and validate Korean MHBT for identification of giftedness. MHBT in this study consists of KFT-HB and MHBT-5. MHBT-S was composed of 1) space presentation and thinking ability, space perception,. physics/technic tasks 2) affective domain; creativity, achievement motivation, desire of knowledge, social competence questionnaire 3) performance attitude questionnaire 4) interest questionnaire. The subject were 489 middle school students (1 or 2grade) in the education centers for gifted youth and general classes. Except a few subscales, internal consistent reliability was considered good. Korean MHBT discriminated well gifted students from general students in KFT-HB and some subtests of MHBT-5. As results, Korean MHBT in this study was expected to be a reliable and valid instrument for identification of korean gifted students.
Keywords
MHBT(Muenchener Hochbegabungsbatterie); Identification of giftedness; Reliability; Validity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 구자억 외 (2002). 동서양 주요 국가들의 영재교육. 서울: 문음사
2 국정브리핑 (2007). 과학영재학교 2-3곳 신설... 초중고 영재반은 2배 늘려. http://korea.kr//newsWeb/appmanager/news. 2007. 12. 14일자
3 김진희 (1994). 영재 판별 평정 척도의 타당화 연구. 석사학위논문. 숙명여자대학교
4 데이비스, 림 저/ 이경화, 최병연, 박숙희 역 (2005). 영재교육. 서울: 박학사
5 박주용, 오현숙 (2005). 기질 및 성격검사에서 밝혀진 영재기관 영재의 특성이 영재 선발에 주는 시사점. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제. 99(1). 143-156
6 박춘성, 김동일 (2007). 학교기반 영재판별과 연구기반 영재판별에 대한 실증적 분석. 열린교육연구. 15(1). 47-67
7 송인섭 (1992). 통계학의 이해. 서울: 학지사
8 조석희 (2003). 영재판별을 위한 간편 창의적 문제해결력 검사 개발을 위한 기초 연구. 한국교육개발원
9 Gagne, F. (1985). Giftedness and Talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Children Quarterly, 19. 103-112
10 Han, K.-S. & Marvin, C. (2000). A five year follow-up study of the Nebraska Project: Still a long way to go. Roeper Review, 23. 25-33   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Heller, H. A. (2005). The Munich Model of Giftedness and Its Impact on Identification and Programming. Gifted and Talented International, 20. 30-36   DOI
12 Heller, H. A. (2006). Das Munchener Hochbegabungsmodell and seine Relevanz fur die Identifizierung und Forderung hochbegabter Sekundarstufenschuler. Vortragsmanuskript. Bad Boll
13 Heller, K. A.(Hrsg.). (2008). Von der Aktivierung der Begabungsreserven zur Hochbegabtenforderung. Forschungsergebnisse aus vier Dekaden. Munster: LitVerlag
14 Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness: A reexamination of the definition of the gifted and talented. Phi Delta Kappan, 60. 180-184
15 Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Interlligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
16 손승남 (2007). 뮌헨영재성 유형모델(MHBT)의 적용가능성 탐색. 교육의 이론과 실천. 12(1). 209-230
17 Stapf, A. (1998). Hochbegabung: Was ist das? In Ministerim für Kultus, Jugend und Sport(Hrsg.) Begabungen fordern. Hochbegabte Kinder in der Grundschule (12-26). Stuttgart: Klett
18 Heller, K. A.(Hrsg.). (2001). Hochbegabung im Kindes- und Jugendalter (2., starkerweiterte Aufl.). Gottingen: Hogrefe
19 BMBF (Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung) (2003). Begabte Kinder finden und fordern. Bonn: BMBF
20 Gardner, H. (1983). Forms of mind. The theory of multiple intelligence. New York: Basic Books
21 Stave, U. (2006). Ein glucklicher Augenblick. Journal fur Begabtenforderung, 6. 45-47
22 Davis, G. A. & Rimm, S. B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented. MA: Allyn & Bacon
23 Heller, K.A. & Hany, E. A. (1986). Identification, Development and Achievement Analysis of Talented and Gifted Children in West Germany. In K.A. Heller & J.F. Feldhusen (Eds.), Identifying and Nurturing the Gifted. Toronto: Huber Publ., 67-82
24 윤여홍 (1998). 영재아 판별에서 한국판 영재아 행동 특성 체크리스트의 유용성에 관한 연구. 영재교육연구. 8(2). 1-30
25 이명자 (2001). 다분문항반응이론을 활용한 영재 판별 측정 도구 개발. 교육학논총. 22(1). 161-180
26 Heller, K. A.(Hrsg.). (2007). Begabt sein in Deutschland. Munster: LitVerlag
27 Heller, K. A. et al. (2000). International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent(2nd ed., revised reprint 2002). Oxford: Pergamon & Amsterdam: Elsevier
28 탄넨바움 저/ 김태련, 김정휘, 조석희 공역 (2004). 영재교육-심리학과 교육학에서의 조망. 서울: 이화여자대학교 출판부
29 조석희 (1990). 과학영재 판별도구의 개발 및 타당화 연구. 초등교육연구. 4(1). 55-69
30 Gagne, F. (2000). Understanding the complex choreography of talent development through DMGT-based analysis. In: Heller, K. A. et al. (2000). International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent(2nd ed., revised reprint 2002, 67-79). Oxford: Pergamon & Amsterdam: Elsevier
31 Gagne, F. (1993). Constructs and models pertaining to exceptional abilities. In: Heller, K. A. et al.(1993) International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent(69-87). Oxford: Pergamon & Amsterdam: Elsevier
32 Heller, K. A. (2004). Identification of Gifted and Talented Students. Psychology Science, 46. 302-323
33 Heller, K. A. & Perleth, Ch. (2007). Munchner Hochbegabungstestbatterie fur die Sekundarstufe (MHBT-S). Gottingen: Beltz Test Gesellschaft (Hogrefe)
34 Renzulli, J. S. & Reis, S. M. (2003). The schoolwide enrichment model: Developing crative and productive giftedness. In: Colangelo & Davis(Eds.). Handbook of gifted education(3rd ed., 184-203). Boston: Allyn & Bacon
35 송인섭, 김누리 (2006). 유아용 영재판별도구의 개발 및 타당화 연구. 영재와 영재교육. 5(2). 63-78