Browse > Article

Comparative Analysis on Selecting Process of Gifted students in Science Education Institute for the Gifted  

Jang, Nak-Han (Department of Science Education, Kongju National University of Education and Educational Institute for the Gifted)
Ryoo, Jin-Wo (Department of Chemistry Education, Kongju National University)
Ryu, Hai-Il (Science Education Institute for the Gifted and Department of Chemistry Education, Kongju National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.16, no.2, 2006 , pp. 101-122 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, selecting process for scientifically gifted students was investigated and analyzed to science education institute for the gifted in university and was compared with foreign education institute for the gifted. The number of science education institute for the gifted was unequality located to the regions, comparing with the ratio of students. Therefore it is necessary for balancing location of science education institute for the gifted according to the ratio of students to let various students have the gifted education. Comparing with the ratio of gifted students between elementary school students and middle school students, the shape of ratios seems to be a inversed-pyramid. It is necessary to select students with the shape of the pyramid, supporting them to be educated, systematically and officially. The gifted students were selected through the procedures of creative test, intelligent test and individual interview in science education institute
Keywords
과학영재교육원;영재학생;영재선발과정;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김언주(2001). 영재의 판별과 선발. 영재교육연구. 11(1), 1-19
2 조석희(1998). 과학영재의 판별. 과학영재교육의 실제에 관한 세미나 발표 논문. 전북대학교 과학영재교육센터
3 홍숙희, 김성원(2000). ERIC 검색을 통한 미국과학영재교육 프로그램 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 20(1), 112-136
4 Dellas, M., & Gaier, E, L. (1970), Identification of creativity, The individual psychological bulletin 73, 55-73   DOI
5 Guilford, J. P. (1967), The nature of human intelligence, New York, NY: McGraw Hill
6 Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T.I. (1993). Creative giftedness: A multivariate investment approach. Gifted child quarterly. 37, 7-15   DOI
7 Torrance, E. P.(1969). Prediction of adult creative achievement among high school seniors. Gifted child quarterly. 13, 223-229   DOI
8 Renzulli, J. S. & Reis, S. M. (1985), The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for the development of creative productivity, In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.). Handbook of gifted education, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
9 Davis, G, A & Rimm, S, B, (1998), Education of the gifted and talented (4th ed.), Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
10 MacKinnon, D. W.(1978), Educating for creativity: A modern myth? In G. A Davis & J. A Scott (Eds.), Training creative thinking, Melbourne, FL: Kreiger
11 Renzulli, J. S, (1998), The Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness, In S, M, Baum, S, M, Reis, & L. R. Maxfield, (Eds) Nurturing the gifts and talents of primary grade students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
12 Gstzels, J. W., & Jackson. P. W.(1962), Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students, NY: John Wiley
13 Wallach, M., & Kogan, N.(1965). Modes of thinking in young children, New York, NY: Holt
14 조석희(1990). 한국과 캐나다의 영재교육에 관한 비교연구. 캐나다연구 제2집
15 최돈형, 강완, 손영아, 전영석(2001). 관학영재교육센터 평가 기준 개발. 영재교육연구. 11(2), 59-85
16 Gardner, H, (1993) Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences, New York, NY: Basic Books
17 최호성(2003). 중등 영재 판별과 교육 프로그램의 비판적 검토. 한국영재학회 추계학술대회 논문집