Browse > Article

Using the Purdue Three-Stage Model to Develop Talent in the Science and Technology  

Moon, Sidney M.
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.14, no.3, 2004 , pp. 19-40 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper reports on current work using the Purdue Three-Stage Model to create enrichment classes in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (the STEM disciplines). First, the history of the Purdue Three-Stage Model and general principles of curriculum and instruction for gifted and talented learners in math/science are reviewed. Then a detailed description of the Model is presented. Following the general description, five specific teacher applications of the Model are presented and compared with respect to the STEM disciplines and developmental levels addressed, and the relative emphasis of each unit on the different stages of the Model. Finally, the advantages of the Model as a framework for curriculum development in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics classes for talented youth are discussed.
Keywords
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Assouline, S., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2003). Developing mathematical talent: A guide for challenging and educating gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock
2 Bangel, N., & Moon, S. M. (Eds). (2004). A Teacher's Guide to the Purdue Three-Stage Model. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Department of Education
3 Benbow, C. P., Perkins, S., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Mathematics taught at a fast pace: A longitudinal evaluation of SMPY's first class. In C. P. Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp.51-78). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
4 Feldhusen, J. F., Kolloff, M. B., Cole, S., & Moon, S. M. (1988). A three-stage model for gifted education: 1988 update. Gifted Child Today, 11(1), 63-67
5 Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (2003). Beyond constructivism: A models and modeling perspective on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Hillsdale, Nj: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates
6 Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The Enrichment Triad Model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
7 Schiever, S. W. (1990). A comprehensive approach to teaching thinking. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
8 Sher, B. T. (2003). Adapting Science curricula for high-ability learners. In J. VanTassel-Baska & C. A. Little (Eds.), Content-based curriculum (pp. 191-218). Waco, TX: Prufrock
9 Stanley, J. C. (1996). In the Beginning: The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.) , Intellectual Talent: Psychometric and Social Issues (pp. 225-235). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
10 VanTassel-Baska, J. (1998). Comprehensive Curriculum for Gifted Learners (2nd ed. ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon
11 Wheatley, G. H. (1994). Talent development theory and practice. In J. B. Hansen& S. M. Hoover (Eds.) , Talent development theories and practice (pp. 143-152). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt
12 Gallagher, S. A. (1997). Problem-based learning: Where did it come from, what does it do, and where is it going. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20(4), 332-362   DOI
13 Hansen, J. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(3), 115-121   DOI   ScienceOn
14 VanTassel-Baska, J. (1994). Comprehensive Curriculum for Gifted Learners (2nd ed. ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon
15 Wood, B. K., & Moon, S. M. (2004). A follow-up study of students eligible for a gifted math program. Unpublished manuscript
16 Feldhusen, J. F., & Kolloff, P. B. (1986). The Purdue Three-Stage Enrichment Model at the Elementary Level. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 153-179). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
17 Feldhusen, J. F., & Kolloff, M. B. (1978, Sept/Oct). A three-stage model for gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 1, 39-50
18 Feldhusen, J. F., & Treffinger, D. J. (1985). Creative thinking and problem solving in gifted education. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt
19 Moon, S. M. (2003a). Developing personal talent. In F. J. Monks & H. Wagner (Eds.), Development of human potential: Investment into our future. Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the European Council for High Ability (ECHA). Rhodes, October 9-13, 2002 (pp. 11-21). Bad Honnef, Germany: K.H. Bock
20 Moon, S. M. (2003b). Personal Talent. High Ability Studies, 14(1), 5-21   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Moon, S. M., Feldhusen, J. F., & Dillon, D. R (1994). Long-term effects of an enrichment program based on the Purdue Three-Stage Model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(1), 38-48   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Hersberger, J. R. (1994). Computers and the mathematically gifted: Facilitating the development of higher level thinking. In J. B. Hansen & S. M. Hoover(Eds.), Talent development theories and practice (pp. 131-142). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt
23 Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), The handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591-646). Hillsdale, Nj: Lawrence Earlbuam and Associates
24 Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Little, C. A. (Eds.). (2003). Content-based curriculum for high-ability learners. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press
25 Whitman, M. W., & Moon, S. M. (1993). Bridge Building: Conducting scientific research redefines the roles of teacher and student. Gifted Child Today, 16(5), 47-50
26 Schlee, B. (2004). Forensic Science. In N. Bangel & S. M. Moon (Eds.), A Teacher's Guide to the Purdue Three-Stage Model. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Department of Education
27 Woermbke, M. B. (2004). Mathematics. In N. Bangel & S. M. Moon (Eds.), A teacher's guide to the Purdue Three-Stage Model. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Department of Education
28 Moon, S. M. (1993). Using the Purdue Three-Stage Model: Developing talent at the secondary level. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 5(2), 31-35
29 Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1986). The enrichment revolving door model: A schoolwide plan for the development of creative productivity. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 216-266). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
30 Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (Eds). (1983). Academic precocity: Aspects of its development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
31 Reger, B. (2004). Textbooks for regular science students are not satisfactory for gifted students. Unpublished manuscript
32 Feldhusen, J. F. (1980), The three-stage model of course design. Englewood Cliffs, Nj: Educational Technology Publications
33 Chamberlin, S., & Moon, S. M. (2004). Analysis of interest during and after Model Eliciting Activities: A comparison of gifted and general population students. Unpublished manuscript.
34 Schiever, S. W., & Maker, C. J. (2003). New directions in enrichment and acceleration. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook on gifted education (pp. 163-173). Boston: Allyn and Bacon
35 Rovira, N. D. (2004). Advanced Chemistry 4th to 6th. In N. Bangel & S. M. Moon (Eds.) , A teacher's guide to the Purdue Three-Stage Model. Indianapolis:IN
36 Nidiffer, L. G., & Moon, S. M. (1994). Middle school seminars. Gifted Child Today, 17(2), 24-27, 39-41
37 Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1967). Scientific creativity. Science Journal, 3(9), 80-84.
38 Kolloff, M. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1981, May/June). PACE (Program for Academic and Creative Enrichment): An application of the three-stage model. Gifted Child Today, 5, 47-50
39 Powley, S. A., & Moon, S. M. (1993). Secondary English theme units: A pragmatic approach. Gifted Child Today, 16(4), 52-61
40 Moon, S. M., Feldhusen, J. F., Powley, S., Nidiffer, L., & Whitman, M. (1993). Secondary applications of the Purdue Three-Stage Model. Gifted Child Today, 16(3), 2-9
41 Kolloff, P. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1984). The effects of enrichment on self-concept and creative thinking. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(2), 53-57   DOI