Browse > Article

Development of the Interdisciplinary - Multistrategic Science Education Program(IMSEP) for the Education of the Gifted in Science  

배혜경 (한국과학기술원)
김훈 (한국과학기술원)
안정훈 (한국과학기술원)
배새벽 (한국과학기술원)
김용주 (한국과학기술원)
박선미 (한국과학기술원)
심재영 (한국과학기술원)
박은영 (한국과학기술원)
김충기 (한국과학기술원)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.13, no.1, 2003 , pp. 21-42 More about this Journal
Abstract
The Interdisciplinary-Multistrategic Science Education Program(IMSEP) is designed as an efficient program for the education of the gifted in science. An example of the contents is developed, which encompasses mathematics, physics, chemistry, astronomy, and biology. In the program, the complexity(interdisicplinarity) of scientific contents and instructional strategies used to deliver the scientific contents are designed to be correlated to each other in such a way that as the scientific contents gets more complex, the scientific skill to be taught by the instructional strategy becomes deeper. Through the careful balance between the scientific contents and the instructional strategies student's scientific knowledge and scientific skill will develop balanced and the effectiveness of science education will be maximized.
Keywords
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Abrahamson, C. E. and Kimsey, W. D., (2002). General Education, interdisciplinary pedagogy and the process of content transformation. Education, 122, 587
2 Renzulli, J. S., (1986). The Three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds), New York: Cambridge University Press, 53
3 Edens, K. M., (2000). Preparing Problem Solvers for the 21st Century through Problem-Based Learning. College Teaching, 48, 55   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Confrey, J., (1990). A review of the research on student conceptions in mathematics, science, and programming. In C. B. Cazdentlid.(Ed.), Review of Research in Education, Volume 16. Washigton, D.C.: American Education Research Association, 3.
5 Iran-Nejad, A., (1995). Constructivism as substitute for memorization 10 learning: meaning is created by learner. Education, 116, 16
6 Erez, R, (2001). The Interrelationships Among Science, Art, and Values. journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13, 6   DOI
7 Clark, G. and Zimmerman, E., (2002). Nurturing the arts in programs for gifted and talented students. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 747
8 Torp L. and Sage S., (2002). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-16 Education. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
9 Williams, S. M., (1992). Putting Case-Based Instruction Into Context: Examples From Legal and Medical Education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 367   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Beane, J. A., (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 616
11 Olsen, D. G., (1999). Constructivist Principles of Learning and Teaching Methods. Education. 120. 347
12 Clark, M. E. and Wawrytko, S. A., ed., (1990). Rethinking the Curriculum: Toward an Integrated, Interdisciplinary College Education. Green Wood Press, New York
13 Sytsma, R. E., (2001). Changing States of Matter: Science, Education, and Giftedness in 21st Century High Schools. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12, 181   DOI
14 Lowery, L. F., (2002). Inquiry: the emphasis of a bold, new SCience curriculum. THE Journal, 21, 50
15 Jacobs, H. J., ed., (1989). Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
16 Hamm M. and Adams, D., (998). Literacy in Science, Technology, and the Language Arts: an Interdisciplinary Inquiry. Bergin & Garvey