Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2019.21.4.007

Development of the FMEA-based Backdoor Transaction Improvement Model  

Ryou, Sungkook (ISM Korea)
Kim, Sunho (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Myongji University)
Kim, Chongman (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Myongji University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science / v.21, no.4, 2019 , pp. 7-15 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper proposes the FMEA-based model to avoid backdoor transactions when purchasers select suppliers for products and services. In the model, backdoor transactions consist of two categories: backdoor selling and maverick buying. Both of which influence negative effects on cost savings due to not only uncompetitive advantage but also unusable purchasing leverage by unethical and misbehavior of purchase requestors. For the risk evaluation based on FMEA, three and five risk types of backdoor selling and maverick buying are identified respectively. Current risk priority numbers(RPN) based on those risk types are calculated by three categories: occurrence, detection and severity. Six risk mitigation strategies and fourteen mitigation tactics are identified to improve current RPN. In order to validate the model, questionnaires are collected from fifteen companies and statistically analyzed. The analysis result shows that the model reduces backdoor transaction risks and has no differences in reduction of backdoor transaction risks regardless of the type of purchasing organization units and existence of purchasing procedures in the organization.
Keywords
Backdoor Selling; FMEA; Maverick Buying; Risk Priority Number(RPN);
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 ADR International(2013), Category Management-CategoryPlanning, Retrieved Sep. 5, 2019, from http://www.dropbox.com/oneadr(Licensees)/VitalADR-Service/LearningIP/Workshop-Standard/CategoryManagement.
2 J. L. Cavinato, M. Dennis, C. S. Lallatin, et al(2015), ISM Glossary of Key Supply Management Terms (6th ed), Institute for Supply Management, Tempe, AZ.
3 K. Karjalainene, K. Kemppainen, E. M. van Raaij(2009), "Non-Complaint Work Behaviour in Purchasing: An Exploration of Reasons Behind Maverirck Buying." Journal of Business Ethics, 85: 245-261.   DOI
4 A. M. Kenndy(1982), "Industrial Buying Behaviour: A Review of Literature and Research Needs." Management Decision, 20(1):38-51.   DOI
5 S. Kulp, T. Randall, G. Brandyberry, K. Potts(2006), "Using Organizational Controls Mechanisms to Enhance Procurement Efficiency: How GlaxoSmithKline Improved the Effectiveness of E-Procurement." Interfaces, 36(3):209-219.   DOI
6 G. Strauss(1962), "Tactics of Lateral Relationship: The Purchasing Agent." Administrative Science Quarterly, 7(2):161-186.   DOI
7 G. Strauss(1964), "Work-Flow Frictions, Interfunctional Rivalry, and Professionalism: A Case Stud y of Purchasing Agents." Human Organization, 23(2): 137-149.   DOI
8 Y. Vardi, V. Wiener(1996), "Misbehavior in organizations: A motivational framework." Organization Science, 7(2):151-165.   DOI
9 C. Welborn(2007), "Using FMEA To Assess Outsourcing Risk." Quality Progress, 40(8):17-21.
10 C. Welborn(2010), "Applying Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to Supplier Selection." Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(3):7-14.