Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5808/GI.2014.12.4.268

Molecular Characterization of Legionellosis Drug Target Candidate Enzyme Phosphoglucosamine Mutase from Legionella pneumophila (strain Paris): An In Silico Approach  

Hasan, Md. Anayet (Department of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Chittagong)
Mazumder, Md. Habibul Hasan (Department of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Chittagong)
Khan, Md. Arif (Department of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University)
Hossain, Mohammad Uzzal (Department of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University)
Chowdhury, A.S.M. Homaun Kabir (Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Discipline, Khulna University)
Abstract
The harshness of legionellosis differs from mild Pontiac fever to potentially fatal Legionnaire's disease. The increasing development of drug resistance against legionellosis has led to explore new novel drug targets. It has been found that phosphoglucosamine mutase, phosphomannomutase, and phosphoglyceromutase enzymes can be used as the most probable therapeutic drug targets through extensive data mining. Phosphoglucosamine mutase is involved in amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism. The purpose of this study was to predict the potential target of that specific drug. For this, the 3D structure of phosphoglucosamine mutase of Legionella pneumophila (strain Paris) was determined by means of homology modeling through Phyre2 and refined by ModRefiner. Then, the designed model was evaluated with a structure validation program, for instance, PROCHECK, ERRAT, Verify3D, and QMEAN, for further structural analysis. Secondary structural features were determined through self-optimized prediction method with alignment (SOPMA) and interacting networks by STRING. Consequently, we performed molecular docking studies. The analytical result of PROCHECK showed that 95.0% of the residues are in the most favored region, 4.50% are in the additional allowed region and 0.50% are in the generously allowed region of the Ramachandran plot. Verify3D graph value indicates a score of 0.71 and 89.791, 1.11 for ERRAT and QMEAN respectively. Arg419, Thr414, Ser412, and Thr9 were found to dock the substrate for the most favorable binding of S-mercaptocysteine. However, these findings from this current study will pave the way for further extensive investigation of this enzyme in wet lab experiments and in that way assist drug design against legionellosis.
Keywords
docking analysis; drug delivery systems; homology modeling; Legionella pneumophila; legionellosis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Yu VL, Plouffe JF, Pastoris MC, Stout JE, Schousboe M, Widmer A, et al. Distribution of Legionella species and serogroups isolated by culture in patients with sporadic community- acquired legionellosis: an international collaborative survey. J Infect Dis 2002;186:127-128.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Fry NK, Alexiou-Daniel S, Bangsborg JM, Bernander S, Castellani Pastoris M, Etienne J, et al. A multicenter evaluation of genotypic methods for the epidemiologic typing of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1: results of a pan- European study. Clin Microbiol Infect 1999;5:462-477.   DOI
3 Luck PC, Helbig JH, Günter U, Assmann M, Blau R, Koch H, et al. Epidemiologic investigation by macrorestriction analysis and by using monoclonal antibodies of nosocomial pneumonia caused by Legionella pneumophila serogroup 10. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:2692-2697.
4 Schoonmaker D, Heimberger T, Birkhead G. Comparison of ribotyping and restriction enzyme analysis using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for distinguishing Legionella pneumophila isolates obtained during a nosocomial outbreak. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:1491-1498.
5 Struelens MJ. Consensus guidelines for appropriate use and evaluation of microbial epidemiologic typing systems. Clin Microbiol Infect 1996;2:2-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Lawrence C, Reyrolle M, Dubrou S, Forey F, Decludt B, Goulvestre C, et al. Single clonal origin of a high proportion of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates from patients and the environment in the area of Paris, France, over a 10-year period. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:2652-2655.
7 Jolly L, Ferrari P, Blanot D, Van Heijenoort J, Fassy F, Mengin-Lecreulx D. Reaction mechanism of phosphoglucosamine mutase from Escherichia coli. Eur J Biochem 1999;262:202-210.   DOI
8 Jolly L, Pompeo F, van Heijenoort J, Fassy F, Mengin-Lecreulx D. Autophosphorylation of phosphoglucosamine mutase from Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 2000;182:1280-1285.   DOI
9 Grünewald S. The clinical spectrum of phosphomannomutase 2 deficiency (CDG-Ia). Biochim Biophys Acta 2009;1792:827-834.   DOI
10 Geourjon C, Deleage G. SOPMA: significant improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by consensus prediction from multiple alignments. Comput Appl Biosci 1995;11:681-684.
11 Franceschini A, Szklarczyk D, Frankild S, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, et al. STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:D808-D815.   DOI
12 Bennett-Lovsey RM, Herbert AD, Sternberg MJ, Kelley LA. Exploring the extremes of sequence/structure space with ensemble fold recognition in the program Phyre. Proteins 2008;70:611-625.
13 Xu D, Zhang Y. Improving the physical realism and structural accuracy of protein models by a two-step atomic-level energy minimization. Biophys J 2011;101:2525-2534.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 1993;26:283-291.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Laskowski RA, Rullmannn JA, MacArthur MW, Kaptein R, Thornton JM. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J Biomol NMR 1996;8:477-486.
16 Ramachandran GN, Ramakrishnan C, Sasisekharan V. Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. J Mol Biol 1963;7:95-99.   DOI
17 Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss- PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 1997;18:2714-2723.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Colovos C, Yeates TO. Verification of protein structures: patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions. Protein Sci 1993;2:1511-1519.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Eisenberg D, Luthy R, Bowie JU. VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Methods Enzymol 1997;277:396-404.   DOI
20 Benkert P, Tosatto SC, Schomburg D. QMEAN: a comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. Proteins 2008;71:261-277.   DOI
21 Dundas J, Ouyang Z, Tseng J, Binkowski A, Turpaz Y, Liang J. CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:W116-W118.   DOI
22 Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 2010;31:455-461.
23 Patel H, Gruning BA, Günther S, Merfort I. PyWATER: a PyMOL plug-in to find conserved water molecules in proteins by clustering. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2978-2980.   DOI
24 Schneider M; UniProt Consortium, Poux S. UniProtKB amid the turmoil of plant proteomics research. Front Plant Sci 2012;3:270.
25 UniProt Consortium. Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:D191-D198.   DOI
26 Chaurasia G, Iqbal Y, Hanig C, Herzel H, Wanker EE, Futschik ME. UniHI: an entry gate to the human protein interactome. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:D590-D594.   DOI
27 Sheik SS, Sundararajan P, Hussain AS, Sekar K. Ramachandran plot on the web. Bioinformatics 2002;18:1548-1549.   DOI
28 Chaurasia G, Malhotra S, Russ J, Schnoegl S, Hanig C, Wanker EE, et al. UniHI 4: new tools for query, analysis and visualization of the human protein-protein interactome. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:D657-D660.   DOI
29 Tikk D, Thomas P, Palaga P, Hakenberg J, Leser U. A comprehensive benchmark of kernel methods to extract protein-protein interactions from literature. PLoS Comput Biol 2010;6:e1000837.   DOI
30 Ho BK, Thomas A, Brasseur R. Revisiting the Ramachandran plot: hard-sphere repulsion, electrostatics, and H-bonding in the alpha-helix. Protein Sci 2003;12:2508-2522.
31 Hasan MA, Alauddin SM, Al Amin M, Nur SM, Mannan A. In silico molecular characterization of cysteine protease YopT from Yersinia pestis by homology modeling and binding site identification. Drug Target Insights 2014;8:1-9.
32 Morris AL, MacArthur MW, Hutchinson EG, Thornton JM. Stereochemical quality of protein structure coordinates. Proteins 1992;12:345-364.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Premalatha D, Ravindra P, Rao LV. Homology modeling of putative thioredoxin from Helicobacetr pylori. Indian J Biotechnol 2007;6:485-489.
34 Bowie JU, Luthy R, Eisenberg D. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science 1991;253:164-170.   DOI
35 Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999;292:195-202.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Zhou C, Hou C, Wei X, Zhang Q. Improved hybrid optimization algorithm for 3D protein structure prediction. J Mol Model 2014;20:2289.   DOI
37 Benkert P, Künzli M, Schwede T. QMEAN server for protein model quality estimation. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:W510-W514.   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Pruckler JM, Mermel LA, Benson RF, Giorgio C, Cassiday PK, Breiman RF, et al. Comparison of Legionella pneumophila isolates by arbitrarily primed PCR and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: analysis from seven epidemic investigations. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2872-2875.
39 Kelley LA, Sternberg MJ. Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat Protoc 2009;4:363-371.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, Duvaud S, Wilkins MR, Appel RD, et al. Protein Identification and Analysis Tools on the ExPASy Server. In: The Proteomics Protocols Handbook (Walker JM, ed.). Totowa: Human Press Inc., 2005. pp. 571-607.
41 Benkert P, Biasini M, Schwede T. Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models. Bioinformatics 2011;27:343-350.   DOI   ScienceOn