1 |
Giardine B, Riemer C, Hardison RC, Burhans R, Elnitski L, Shah P, et al. Galaxy: a platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis. Genome Res 2005;15:1451-1455.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Loman NJ, Misra RV, Dallman TJ, Constantinidou C, Gharbia SE, Wain J, et al. Performance comparison of benchtop highthroughput sequencing platforms. Nat Biotechnol 2012;30: 434-439.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Sanders SJ, Murtha MT, Gupta AR, Murdoch JD, Raubeson MJ, Willsey AJ, et al. De novo mutations revealed by whole-exome sequencing are strongly associated with autism. Nature 2012; 485:237-241.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Neale BM, Kou Y, Liu L, Ma'ayan A, Samocha KE, Sabo A, et al. Patterns and rates of exonic de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorders. Nature 2012;485:242-245.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
O'Roak BJ, Deriziotis P, Lee C, Vives L, Schwartz JJ, Girirajan S, et al. Exome sequencing in sporadic autism spectrum disorders identifies severe de novo mutations. Nat Genet 2011; 43:585-589.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Olivier M. A haplotype map of the human genome. Physiol Genomics 2003;13:3-9.
DOI
|
7 |
International HapMap Consortium, Frazer KA, Ballinger DG, Cox DR, Hinds DA, Stuve LL, et al. A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs. Nature 2007;449: 851-861.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Neale BM, Rivas MA, Voight BF, Altshuler D, Devlin B, Orho-Melander M, et al. Testing for an unusual distribution of rare variants. PLoS Genet 2011;7:e1001322.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Stitziel NO, Kiezun A, Sunyaev S. Computational and statistical approaches to analyzing variants identified by exome sequencing. Genome Biol 2011;12:227.
DOI
|
10 |
Wu MC, Lee S, Cai T, Li Y, Boehnke M, Lin X. Rare-variant association testing for sequencing data with the sequence kernel association test. Am J Hum Genet 2011;89:82-93.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Viswanathan GA, Seto J, Patil S, Nudelman G, Sealfon SC. Getting started in biological pathway construction and analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 2008;4:e16.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Khatri P, Sirota M, Butte AJ. Ten years of pathway analysis: current approaches and outstanding challenges. PLoS Comput Biol 2012;8:e1002375.
DOI
|
13 |
Mi H, Muruganujan A, Thomas PD. PANTHER in 2013: modeling the evolution of gene function, and other gene attributes, in the context of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:D377-D386.
DOI
|
14 |
Joshi-Tope G, Gillespie M, Vastrik I, D'Eustachio P, Schmidt E, de Bono B, et al. Reactome: a knowledgebase of biological pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:D428-D432.
|
15 |
Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 2009;4:44-57.
DOI
|
16 |
Goecks J, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J; Galaxy Team. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol 2010;11:R86.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Blankenberg D, Von Kuster G, Coraor N, Ananda G, Lazarus R, Mangan M, et al. Galaxy: a web-based genome analysis tool for experimentalists. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 2010;Chapter 19:Unit 19.10.11-21.
|
18 |
Howie BN, Donnelly P, Marchini J. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome- wide association studies. PLoS Genet 2009;5:e1000529.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Li Y, Willer CJ, Ding J, Scheet P, Abecasis GR. MaCH: using sequence and genotype data to estimate haplotypes and unobserved genotypes. Genet Epidemiol 2010;34:816-834.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:e164.
DOI
|
21 |
Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 2010;26:841-842.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Reese MG, Moore B, Batchelor C, Salas F, Cunningham F, Marth GT, et al. A standard variation file format for human genome sequences. Genome Biol 2010;11:R88.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Hu H, Huff CD, Moore B, Flygare S, Reese MG, Yandell M. VAAST 2.0: improved variant classification and disease-gene identification using a conservation-controlled amino acid substitution matrix. Genet Epidemiol 2013;37:622-634.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Yandell M, Huff C, Hu H, Singleton M, Moore B, Xing J, et al. A probabilistic disease-gene finder for personal genomes. Genome Res 2011;21:1529-1542.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Ng PC, Henikoff S. Predicting the effects of amino acid substitutions on protein function. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2006;7:61-80.
DOI
|
26 |
Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:10915- 10919.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Hubisz MJ, Pollard KS, Siepel A. PHAST and RPHAST: phylogenetic analysis with space/time models. Brief Bioinform 2011;12:41-51.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 2010;7:248-249.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Bromberg Y, Rost B. SNAP: predict effect of non-synonymous polymorphisms on function. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35: 3823-3835.
DOI
|
30 |
Li R, Yu C, Li Y, Lam TW, Yiu SM, Kristiansen K, et al. SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics 2009;25:1966-1967.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a Map- Reduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 2010;20:1297-1303.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
32 |
Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. The Subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:e108.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
33 |
Hatem A, Bozdag D, Toland AE, Catalyurek UV. Benchmarking short sequence mapping tools. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:184.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM [database]. Ithaca: arXiv, Cornell University, 2013. arXiv:1303.3997.
|
35 |
1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Abecasis GR, Auton A, Brooks LD, DePristo MA, Durbin RM, et al. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 2012;491:56-65.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
36 |
Lam HY, Pan C, Clark MJ, Lacroute P, Chen R, Haraksingh R, et al. Detecting and annotating genetic variations using the HugeSeq pipeline. Nat Biotechnol 2012;30:226-229.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
37 |
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009;25:2078-2079.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
38 |
DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet 2011;43:491-498.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
39 |
You N, Murillo G, Su X, Zeng X, Xu J, Ning K, et al. SNP calling using genotype model selection on high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 2012;28:643-650.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
40 |
Nielsen R, Paul JS, Albrechtsen A, Song YS. Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data. Nat Rev Genet 2011;12:443-451.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
41 |
Browning BL, Browning SR. A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. Am J Hum Genet 2009;84: 210-223.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
42 |
Pabinger S, Dander A, Fischer M, Snajder R, Sperk M, Efremova M, et al. A survey of tools for variant analysis of next-generation genome sequencing data. Brief Bioinform 2013 Jan 21 [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs086.
|
43 |
Bromberg Y. Building a genome analysis pipeline to predict disease risk and prevent disease. J Mol Biol 2013;425:3993- 4005.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
44 |
Moreau Y, Tranchevent LC. Computational tools for prioritizing candidate genes: boosting disease gene discovery. Nat Rev Genet 2012;13:523-536.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
45 |
Lyon GJ, Wang K. Identifying disease mutations in genomic medicine settings: current challenges and how to accelerate progress. Genome Med 2012;4:58.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
46 |
Ng SB, Turner EH, Robertson PD, Flygare SD, Bigham AW, Lee C, et al. Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes. Nature 2009;461:272-276.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
47 |
Lee WP, Stromberg M, Ward A, Stewart C, Garrison E, Marth GT. MOSAIK: a hash-based algorithm for accurate next-generation sequencing read mapping [database]. Ithaca: arXiv, Cornell University, 2013. arXiv:1309.1149.
|
48 |
Alkan C, Kidd JM, Marques-Bonet T, Aksay G, Antonacci F, Hormozdiari F, et al. Personalized copy number and segmental duplication maps using next-generation sequencing. Nat Genet 2009;41:1061-1067.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
49 |
Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009;25:1754- 1760.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
50 |
Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 2012;9:357-359.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
51 |
Wang Y, Lu J, Yu J, Gibbs RA, Yu F. An integrative variant analysis pipeline for accurate genotype/haplotype inference in population NGS data. Genome Res 2013;23:833-842.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
52 |
Li B, Leal SM. Methods for detecting associations with rare variants for common diseases: application to analysis of sequence data. Am J Hum Genet 2008;83:311-321.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
53 |
Browning BL, Yu Z. Simultaneous genotype calling and haplotype phasing improves genotype accuracy and reduces false-positive associations for genome-wide association studies. Am J Hum Genet 2009;85:847-861.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
54 |
Altmann A, Weber P, Bader D, Preuss M, Binder EB, Muller-Myhsok B. A beginners guide to SNP calling from high-throughput DNA-sequencing data. Hum Genet 2012; 131:1541-1554.
DOI
ScienceOn
|