Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5808/GI.2012.10.2.128

Characteristics in Molecular Vibrational Frequency Patterns between Agonists and Antagonists of Histamine Receptors  

Oh, S. June (Department of Pharmacology, Inje University College of Medicine)
Abstract
To learn the differences between the structure-activity relationship and molecular vibration-activity relationship in the ligand-receptor interaction of the histamine receptor, 47 ligands of the histamine receptor were analyzed by structural similarity and molecular vibrational frequency patterns. The radial tree that was produced by clustering analysis of molecular vibrational frequency patterns shows its potential for the functional classification of histamine receptor ligands.
Keywords
corralled intensity of molecular vibrational frequency; G protein-coupled receptors; histamine receptors; molecular vibration-activity relationship;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Chien EY, Liu W, Zhao Q, Katritch V, Han GW, Hanson MA, et al. Structure of the human dopamine D3 receptor in complex with a D2/D3 selective antagonist. Science 2010;330:1091-1095.   DOI
2 Shimamura T, Shiroishi M, Weyand S, Tsujimoto H, Winter G, Katritch V, et al. Structure of the human histamine H1 receptor complex with doxepin. Nature 2011;475:65-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Medina VA, Rivera ES. Histamine receptors and cancer pharmacology. Br J Pharmacol 2010;161:755-767.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Schwartz JC, Arrang JM, Garbarg M, Pollard H, Ruat M. Histaminergic transmission in the mammalian brain. Physiol Rev 1991;71:1-51.   DOI
5 Hill SJ. Distribution, properties, and functional characteristics of three classes of histamine receptor. Pharmacol Rev 1990;42:45-83.
6 Hill SJ, Ganellin CR, Timmerman H, Schwartz JC, Shankley NP, Young JM, et al. International Union of Pharmacology. XIII. Classification of histamine receptors. Pharmacol Rev 1997;49:253-278.
7 Keller A, Vosshall LB. A psychophysical test of the vibration theory of olfaction. Nat Neurosci 2004;7:337-338.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Takane SY, Mitchell JB. A structure-odour relationship study using EVA descriptors and hierarchical clustering. Org Biomol Chem 2004;2:3250-3255.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Godden JW, Xue L, Bajorath J. Combinatorial preferences affect molecular similarity/diversity calculations using binary fingerprints and Tanimoto coefficients. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2000;40:163-166.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Schmidt MW, Baldridge KK, Boatz JA, Elbert ST, Gordon MS, Jensen JH, et al. General atomic and molecular electronic structure system. J Comput Chem 1993;14:1347-1363.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Keseru GM, Makara GM. The influence of lead discovery strategies on the properties of drug candidates. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2009;8:203-212.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Bleicher KH, Bohm HJ, Müller K, Alanine AI. Hit and lead generation: beyond high-throughput screening. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2003;2:369-378.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Zheng CJ, Han LY, Yap CW, Ji ZL, Cao ZW, Chen YZ. Therapeutic targets: progress of their exploration and investigation of their characteristics. Pharmacol Rev 2006;58:259-279.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Drews J. Drug discovery: a historical perspective. Science 2000;287:1960-1964.   DOI
15 Cherezov V, Rosenbaum DM, Hanson MA, Rasmussen SG, Thian FS, Kobilka TS, et al. High-resolution crystal structure of an engineered human beta2-adrenergic G protein-coupled receptor. Science 2007;318:1258-1265.   DOI