Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5808/GI.2009.7.3.148

The Effect of Increasing Control-to-case Ratio on Statistical Power in a Simulated Case-control SNP Association Study  

Kang, Moon-Su (Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
Choi, Sun-Hee (Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
Koh, In-Song (Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Genomics & Informatics / v.7, no.3, 2009 , pp. 148-151 More about this Journal
Abstract
Generally, larger sample size leads to a greater statistical power to detect a significant difference. We may increase the sample size for both case and control in order to obtain greater power. However, it is often the case that increasing sample size for case is not feasible for a variety of reasons. In order to look at change in power as the ratio of control to case varies (1:1 to 4:1), we conduct association tests with simulated data generated by PLINK. The simulated data consist of 50 disease SNPs and 300 non-disease SNPs and we compute powers for disease SNPs. Genetic Power Calculator was used for computing powers with varying the ratio of control to case (1:1, 2:1, 3:1, 4:1). In this study, we show that gains in statistical power resulting from increasing the ratio of control to case are substantial for the simulated data. Similar results might be expected for real data.
Keywords
association study; ratio of control to case; simulated data; SNP; statistical power;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Burton, P.R., Hansell, A.L., Fortier I., Manolio, T.A., Khoury, M.J., Little, J., and Elliott, P. (2009). Size matters: just how big is BIG? Quantifying realistic sample size requirements for human genome epidemiology. Int. J. Epidemiol. 38, 263-273   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Lewis, C.M. (2002). Genetic association studies: design, analysis and interpretation. Brief Bioinform. 3, 144-153   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Park, K., and Kim, H. (2007). A review of power and sample size estimation in genomewide association studies. J. Prev. Med. Public Health. 40, 114-121   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Ferreira, M.A.R., Bender, D., Maller, J., Sklar, P., De Bakker, P.I.W., Daily, M.J., and Sham, P.C. (2007). PLINK: A toolset for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81,559-575   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Dupont, W.D., and Plummer, W.D.Jr. (1990). Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin. Trials. 11, 116-128   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Ambrosius, W.T., Lange, E.M., and Langefeld, C.D. (2004). Power for genetic association studies with random allele frequencies and genotype distributions. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74, 683-693   DOI   ScienceOn
7 De La Vega, F.M., Gordon, D., Su, X., Scafe, C., Isaac, H., Gilbert, D.A., and Spier, E.G. (2005). Power and sample size calculations for genetic case/control studies using gene-centric SNP maps: Application to human chromosomes 6, 21, and 22 in three populations. Hum. Hered. 60, 43-60   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Hennessy, S., Bilker, W.B., Berlin, J.A., and Storm B.L. (1999). Factors influencing the optimal control to case ratio in matched case-control studies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 149, 195-197   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
9 Schork, N.J. (2002). Power calculation for genetic association studies using estimated probability distributions. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70, 1480-1489   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Dupont, W.D. (1988). Power calculations for matched case-control studies. Biometrics 44, 1157-1168   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
11 Purcell, S., Cherny, S.S., and Sham, P.C. (2003). Genetic power calculator: design of linkage and association genetic mapping studies of complex traits. Bioinformatics 19, 149-150   DOI   ScienceOn