Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14475/jhpc.2021.24.2.97

Experiences of Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions among Patients with Terminal Cancer  

Kim, Yoon Sun (Department of Nursing, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences)
Publication Information
Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care / v.24, no.2, 2021 , pp. 97-108 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the life-sustaining treatment decisions of terminal cancer patients. Methods: Data on 10 terminal cancer patients who decided to withhold or withdraw from treatment were collected using in-depth interviews conducted from February 8 to October 30, 2019. Data were collected until saturation was reached and then analyzed using Colaizzi's phenomenological method. Results: In this study, six thematic clusters were identified: "having complicated feelings", "making choices to protect everyone", "accepting and preparing for death", "feeling distress", "pursuing spiritual wellbeing", and "evaluating the new system". Conclusion: When facing death, terminal cancer patients often made choices to protect their family and their dignity with uneasiness of mind when deciding to withdraw from life-sustaining treatments. Though many patients had accepted and prepared for death, they experienced distress about leaving children behind after death. They also pursued spiritual well-being to find peace after deciding to withdraw from life-sustaining treatment. In addition, participants evaluated the new system of policies pertaining to decisions on life-sustaining treatment. Thus, various approaches regarding acceptance and preparation for death, communication with family, hope, and spiritual comfort should be taken in educational interventions to assist terminal cancer patients as they decide whether to withdraw from life-sustaining treatment.
Keywords
Advance directives; Decision making; Neoplasms; Terminal care; Qualitative research;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ministry of Government Legislation. Act on hospice and palliative care and decisions on life-sustaining treatment for patients at the end of life [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Government Legislation; c2016 [cited 2019 Jan 2]. Available from: https://www.lst.go.kr/decn/content-Detail.do?pgNo=1&cate=&searchOption=0&searchText=&bno=1031.
2 Bioethics Policy Research Center. Survey on withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and advanced directives. Seoul:Bioethics Policy Research Center;2011. p. 8.
3 Hussey PS, Wertheimer S, Mehrotra A. The association between health care quality and cost: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:27-34.   DOI
4 Lee MH, Park YH. Factors influencing attitude toward advance directives of older cancer patients. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs 2015;27:449-58.   DOI
5 Hwang HY, Yang SJ. A comparative study on the perceptions of elderly patients and their caregivers toward life-sustaining treatment. Korean J Med Ethics 2016;19:484-503.   DOI
6 Chang WK, Ahn KJ, Kim MY, Kim YK, Han YJ. The role of a patient's family when the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment is expected: a narrative analysis. Korean J Med Ethics 2015;18:172-89.   DOI
7 Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy [Internet]. Seoul: KoNIBP; c2020 [cited 2020 Feb 20]. Available from: https://www.lst.go.kr/ main/main.do.
8 McConnell-Henry T, Chapman Y, Francis K. Husserl and Heidegger: exploring the disparity. Int J Nurs Pract 2009;15:7-15.   DOI
9 Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Effective evaluation: improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers;c1981. p. 1-444.
10 Sandelowski M. The problem of rigor in qualitative research. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1986;8:27-37.   DOI
11 Chang WK, Ahn KJ, Kim MY, Kim YR, Han YJ. The role of a patient's family when the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment is expected: A narrative analysis. Korean J Med Ethics 2015;18:172-89.   DOI
12 Kim MH, Kang EH, Kim MY. Family decision-making to withdraw life-sustaining treatment for terminally-ill patients in an unconscious state. Korean J Hosp Palliat Care 2012;15:147-54.   DOI
13 Hickman RL Jr, Daly BJ, Lee E. Decisional conflict and regret: Consequences of surrogate decision making for the chronically critically ill. Appl Nurs Res 2012;25:271-5.   DOI
14 Park EY. The experience of family members on deciding to withdraw life-sustaining treatment for patients who are terminally ill [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei Univ.; 2003. Korean.
15 Brehaut JC, O'Connor AM, Wood TJ, Hack TF, Siminoff L, Gordon E, et al. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making 2003;23:281-92.   DOI
16 Nyatanga B. Knowledge of impending death and its effect on quality of dying. Br J Community Nurs 2015;20:152.   DOI
17 Colaizzi PF. Psychological research as a phenomenologist views it. In: Valle RS, King M, Eds. Existential-phenomenological alternative for psychology. New York:Oxford University Press;1978.
18 Kim YS, Tae YS, Nam KH, Kim HY. The experience of uncertainty in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Asian Oncol Nurs 2018;18:115-26.   DOI
19 Kang JS, Kim HO. The effect of video education on cancer patient advance directive writing. Asian Oncol Nurs 2020;20:39-49.   DOI
20 Chang KE. A phenomenological study on the lived experience of aging of the poor elderly. Korean Acad Soc Welf 2009;61:355-80.   DOI
21 Tae YS. Hope phenomen of Korean cancer patients [dissertation]. Seoul: Ewha Womans Univ.;1995. Korean.
22 Shin E. Effect of religiosity on life-sustaining care and death with dignity among Korean adults. Won-Buddhist Thought & Religious Culture 2019;79,:247-81.
23 Korean Statistical Information Service [Internet]. Statistics of birth and death in the population survey. Daejeon: KOSIS; c2017 [cited 2020 Feb 20]. Available from: https://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsListIndex.do?menuId=M_01_01&vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&parmTabId=M_01_01# SelectStatsBoxDiv.
24 Jung ST. A literary review of the law about Hospice Palliative Care and the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision System for Patients in the Dying Process. Journal of the Korean Academy of Health and Welfare for Elderly 2016;8:145-71.