Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2022.13.04.007

A Study on How to Set up a Standard Framework for AI Ethics and Regulation  

Nam, Mun-Hee (Dept. of AI Public Policy, SNUST Graduate School of Public Policy and Information Technology)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Convergence Society / v.13, no.4, 2022 , pp. 7-15 More about this Journal
Abstract
With the aim of an intelligent world in the age of individual customization through decentralization of information and technology, sharing/opening, and connection, we often see a tendency to cross expectations and concerns in the technological discourse and interest in artificial intelligence more than ever. Recently, it is easy to find claims by futurists that AI singularity will appear before and after 2045. Now, as part of preparations to create a paradigm of coexistence that coexists and prosper with AI in the coming age of artificial intelligence, a standard framework for setting up more correct AI ethics and regulations is required. This is because excluding the risk of omission of setting major guidelines and methods for evaluating reasonable and more reasonable guideline items and evaluation standards are increasingly becoming major research issues. In order to solve these research problems and at the same time to develop continuous experiences and learning effects on AI ethics and regulation setting, we collect guideline data on AI ethics and regulation of international organizations / countries / companies, and research and suggest ways to set up a standard framework (SF: Standard Framework) through a setting research model and text mining exploratory analysis. The results of this study can be contributed as basic prior research data for more advanced AI ethics and regulatory guidelines item setting and evaluation methods in the future.
Keywords
AI; AI Ethics; AI Regulation; Singularity; Algorithms; Win-Win and Coexistence; Standard Framework(SF);
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ministry of Science and Technology Information and Communication. (2020). Human-centered AI ethics standards. 6-8.
2 S. G. Go. (2019). How to coexist with AI. Seoul: Targus, 258-259.
3 D. Lindsay, J. Hogan & T. H. Kim. (2019). An Australian Perspective on AI, Ethics and its Regulatory Challenges. Journal of Law & Economic Regulation, 12(2), 128-136.
4 Microsoft. (2016). Our approach to responsible AI at Microsoft. Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com
5 FTC U.S.A. (2020). Using Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms. Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/businessblog/2020/04/using-artificial-intelligence-algorithm
6 S. W. Haek. (2021). The direction of AI regulation based on the Constitutional Transparency Principle. Sungkyunkwan Law Review, 33(2), 589-622. DOI : 10.17008/skklr.2021.33.2.018   DOI
7 H. O. Lee. (2021). The Guarantee of a Right to Self-Determination in Response to the Decision Making of Artificial Intelligence. The Institute for Legal Studies, 27(1), 35-68. DOI : 10.35901/kjcl.2021.27.1.33   DOI
8 K. F. Lee. (2020). AI Super Power. Seoul: Econbook,
9 D. H. Jeong. (2020a). The era of AI supergap will come in three years.. Seoul: Cheonglim Publishing, 29-31.
10 D. H. Jung. (2020b). The era of AI supergap will come in three years.. Seoul: Cheonglim Publishing, 111.
11 S. H. Kim. (2019). Artificial intelligence AI coexistence paradigm. Seoul: Aquarius, 5-15.
12 Korea Communications Commission. (2021). Basic principles of protecting users of AI-based media recommendation service. Retrieved from http://www.busan.com/view/busan/view.php?code=2021063017354285125&invenCode=9EA1fk&recCode=zQZZkf
13 E. S. Hong. (2019). Neo-Colonialism in The Age of Artificial Intelligence: Sentient Machine and Singularity in Transcendence. Institute of Humanities, 89, 255-284. DOI : 10.21211/JHUM.89.8   DOI
14 Japan Economic Daily. (2020). AI 2045, Artificial Intelligence Future Report. Seoul: Bunny, 13.
15 Saito Kazunori. (2018). What will happen when AI transcends humans?. Seoul: e-public, 15-35.
16 PDPC. (2018). Discussion Paper on AI and Personal Data- Fostering Responaible Development and Adoption of AI. Retrieved from. https://www.privacy.go.kr/pic/nation_singapore05.do
17 UK Government Digital Service. (2019). A guide to the use of AI in the UK public sector. National Information Society Agency, DNA Plus-2019.
18 NAVER. (2018). AI Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.navercorp.com/value/aiCodeEthics
19 Japan Economic Daily. (2020). AI 2045, Artificial Intelligence Future Report. Seoul: Bunny, 140.
20 S. Y. Noh. (2020). AI era, tomorrow of tomorrow. Seoul: Book publishing East Asia, 305.
21 H. W. Han. (2018). A Basic Study on the Possibility of Artificial Intelligence as a Legal Entity. Chung_Ang Law Review, 20(3), 375-411. DOI : 10.21759/caulaw.2018.20.3.375   DOI
22 AI Times. (2021). Ethics and Governance of AI for Health of WHO. Retrieved from http://www.aitimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=139346
23 Commission. (2018). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Retrieved from http://scimonitors.com
24 G. S. Kim. (2019). An Exploratory Study on Artificial Intelligence Governance. Korean Journal of Local Government & Administration Studies, 33(2), 219-236. DOI : 10.18398/kjlgas.2019.33.2.219   DOI
25 H. Y. Park, B. Y. Kim, H. Y. Kwon. (2021). Trends and Implications of Regulations for AI Control. Information Law, 25(2), 3-35. DOI : 10.22846/kafil.25.2.202108.001
26 S. G. Go. (2019). How to coexist with AI. Seoul: Targus, 32.
27 J. P. Sulins & E. J. Kwon. (2019). US Developments in AI Ethics and Governance. Journal of Law & Economic Ragulation, 12(2), 100-115.
28 S. Y. Byun. (2020). A Study on the Problem of AI Bias in Data Ethics. Korea Society of Ethics, 1(128), 143-158. DOI : 10.15801/je.1.128..202003.143   DOI
29 OECD. (2019). OECD Principles on AI. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/ai/principles/
30 ZDNet Korea. (2021). Adoption of UNESCO AI Ethics Recommendations. Retrieved from https://zdnet.co.kr/view/?no=20211124105459
31 H. Y. Park, B. Y. Kim & H. Y. Kwon. (2021). A Study on the Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in the European Union's Bill. Public Law, 49(3), 349-374. DOI : 10.38176/PublicLaw.2021.02.49.3.349   DOI
32 Ministry of Science and Technology. (2021). New generation of artificial intelligence ethics. Retrieved from http://www.most.gov.cn/kjbgz/202109/t20210926_177063.html
33 NIST U.S.A. (2020). NIST Asks A.I. to Explain Itself. Retrieved from https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2020/08/nist-asks-ai-explain-itself
34 J. H. Kim. (2018). AI Recommendations. Retrieved from http://www.aifnlife.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=902
35 Law Council of Australlia. (2019). ArtificialIntelligence: Australia's Ethics Framework. Australlia Gov, 13-28.
36 IBM. (2020). AI Ethics in Practice. Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/kr-ko/artificial-intelligence/ethics?mhsrc=ibmsearch_a&mhq=AI%EC%9C%A4%EB%A6%AC
37 Google. (2018). Artificial Intelligence at Google: Our Principles. Retrieved from. https://ai.google/principles
38 Kakao. (2018). AI Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.kakaocorp.com/page/responsible/detail/algorithm
39 Cate Crawford et al. (2019). AI Now 2019 Report. Retrieved from. https://ainowinstitute.org/AI_Now_2019_Report.pdf
40 DeeepMind. (2017). Ethics & Society Principles, 2017. Retrieved from https://deepmind.com/about/ethics-and-society
41 OpenAI. (2018). OpenAI Charter, 2018 Retrieved from. https://openai.com/charter/
42 J. Y. Hoa. (2018). The Safety, Ethics, and Legal Liability of Autonomous Vehicle in U.S.A. Institution of American Constitution 29(2), 199-244.
43 Samsung AI news. (2019). AI Ethics, 2019. Retrieved from https://news.samsung.com/kr/samsung-ai-news