[KSCI] Korea Science Citation Index Service

http://dx.doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2022.13.04.349

Analysis of the effects of digital privacy security awareness and digital civic engagement on digital privacy protection behavior : focusing on volition and horizontality

Lee, Ryo-whoa (Future Convergence Center, Chung-Ang University)
Hu, Sung-ho (University Policy Research Institute, Korea University)

Publication Information

Journal of the Korea Convergence Society / v.13, no.4, 2022 , pp. 349-358 More about this Journal

Abstract

The aim of this study to analyze the effect of person and situation on digital privacy protection behaviors. The research method design is a factorial design of volition and horizontality. The measurement variables used in the investigation are digital privacy security awareness, digital civic engagement, and digital privacy protection behavior. As a result, the volition had a significant effect on digital privacy protection behavior, and it was found that influence of the high-volition-based condition was greater than the low-volition-based condition. The horizontality had a significant effect on digital privacy security awareness, digital civic engagement, and it was found that influence of the high-horizontality-based condition was greater than the low-horizontality-based condition. In addition, the discussion explains the suitable contents of information security usability based on these research results.

Keywords

Volition; Horizontality; Digital privacy security awareness; Digital civic engagement; Digital privacy protection behavior;

Citations & Related Records

Reference

1	Z. Karanikola & G. Panagiotopoulos. (2018). 4th industrial revolution: The challenge of changing human resources skills. European Journal of Training and Development, 5(3), 1-7.
2	T. M. Singelis, H. C. Triandis, D. P. Bhawuk & M. J. Gelfand. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-cultural research, 29(3), 240-275. DOI
3	J. Leach. (2003). Improving user security behaviour. Computers & Security, 22(8), 685-692. DOI
4	K. Illeris. (2016). How we learn: Learning and non-learning in school and beyond. New York : Routledge.
5	J. P. Kleijnen & C. R. Standridge. (1988). Experimental design and regression analysis in simulation: An FMS case study. European Journal of Operational Research, 33(3), 257-261. DOI
6	S. Hauff, N. F. Richter & T. Tressin. (2015). Situational job characteristics and job satisfaction: The moderating role of national culture. International business review, 24(4), 710-723. DOI
7	R.-W. Lee & H.-S. Lee. (2021). An Exploratory Study on the Learing Experiences of Middle-Aged Women: Focusing on the Consumer Cooperative Activities. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 17(3), 33-57. DOI
8	Z. Nyikes. (2018). Contemporary digital competency review. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 16(1), 124-131. DOI
9	A. Y. Pedersen, R. T. Norgaard & C. Koppe. (2018). Patterns of inclusion: Fostering digital citizenship through hybrid education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 225-236.
10	L. Ayinde & H. Kirkwood. (2020). Rethinking the roles and skills of information professionals in the 4th Industrial Revolution. Business Information Review, 37(4), 142-153. DOI
11	D. Coldwell. (2019). Negative influences of the 4th industrial revolution on the workplace: Towards a theoretical model of entropic citizen behavior in toxic organizations. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(15), 2670-2686. DOI
12	R. H. Fazio, (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. Elsevier.
13	H. C. Triandis. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of personality, 69(6), 907-924. DOI : 10.1111/1467-6494.696169 DOI
14	R. A. Schuette & R. H. Fazio. (1995). Attitude accessibility and motivation as determinants of biased processing: A test of the MODE model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(7), 704-710. DOI
15	K. Illeris. (2004). Transformative learning in the perspective of a comprehensive learning theory. Journal of Transformative education, 2(2), 79-89. DOI
16	L. Tredinnick. (2008). Digital information culture: the individual and society in the digital age. Amsterdam : Elsevier.
17	A. Doolittle & A. C. Faul. (2013). Civic engagement scale: A validation study. Sage Open, 3(3), 2158244013495542.
18	R. H. Baayen. (2010). A real experiment is a factorial experiment. The Mental Lexicon, 5(1), 149-157. DOI
19	L. M. Jones & K. J. Mitchell. (2016). Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship. New media & society, 18(9), 2063-2079. DOI
20	T. Buchanan, C. Paine, A. N. Joinson & U. D. Reips. (2007). Development of measures of online privacy concern and protection for use on the Internet. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 58(2), 157-165. DOI
21	M. Kim & D. Choi. (2018). Development of youth digital citizenship scale and implication for educational setting. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 155-171.