Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2022.13.02.303

An Importance-Performance Analysis on the e-Learning Content Components of Cyber Graduate School  

Lee, Jung Yull (The Faculty of Education, Joongbu University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Convergence Society / v.13, no.2, 2022 , pp. 303-312 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, the importance-performance analysis (IPA) of the content components of remote graduate students was conducted. To this end, an online survey of 221 remote graduate students at J University obtained the following results. First, the importance of content components by area was in the order of learning content, interaction, teaching-learning strategy, and evaluation, and the degree of execution was in the order of teaching-learning strategy, interaction, evaluation, and learning content. Second, it was found that there were significant differences between importance and performance in the four areas of content components: learning content, teaching-learning strategy, interaction, and evaluation. The importance-execution analysis (IPA) was conducted in two dimensions: region-specific and item-specific, and the results are as follows. The learning content was found to be the maintenance area, the teaching-learning strategy and interaction were the key improvement areas, and the evaluation area was the overinvestment area. The results of this study can be used as basic data to diagnose the present of remote graduate school content and to gauge what needs to be improved in the future based on it.
Keywords
Cyber graduate school; Remote lecture; Remote lecture content; Importance-preformance analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ministry of Education. (2020. 9). Plans to improve new normal remote education. Sejong: Author.
2 S. Y. Kim. (2020). Remote education as a new paradigm of university education and university tasks. Happy education, 12(2).
3 S. R. An. (2015). Explore the educational needs through diagnosis of teaching competency in cyber university. Master's thesis. Graduate school of education, Ewha womans university.
4 H. H. Park. (2011). Study on importance and performance for e-learning contents cyber university instructor. Master's thesis. Graduate school of education, Kyungpook National University.
5 U. J. Jang. (2007). 2006 Development State-funded Remote University Content Satisfaction Survey. Research Report of the Korea Educational Research, Information Service CR 2007-8.
6 I. S. Lee. (2018). Proposal on the improvement direction of design course evaluation in cyber universities: Focus on 'S' University case. Journal of Communication Design, 64, 34-42.
7 H. H. Park. (2011). Study on importance and performance for e-learning contents cyber university instructor. Graduate school of education, Kyungpook National University.
8 Korea Educational Research Information Service (2021). Content evaluation criteria. Daegu: Author.
9 I. S. Lee. (2018). Proposal on the Improvement Direction of Design Course Evaluation in Cyber Universities: Focus on 'S' University Case. Communication design research, 64, 140-149.
10 Ministry of Education (2001). Authorization for the establishment and operation of a remote graduate school. Seoul: Author.
11 C Y. hung, K. J. Lee & KS. K. im. (2014). A study of utilizing IPA in urban geriatric hospital choice factor. Health & Social Welfare Review, 34(1), 133-158.   DOI
12 J. H. Leem. (2014). Developmental Study on the Quality Certification Standards of Smart Education Contents. Education information media research, 20(3), 56-65.
13 Ministry of Education. (2021). Criteria for approval of online degree courses at general university. Sejong: Author.
14 H. J. Lee & Y. I. Hong. (2010). A study on learner-centered usability evaluation method for quality management of e-learning content development. Asian journal of education, 11(1), 89-95.
15 H. J. Lee & K. S. Park. (2009). A Strategy of Learner-Centered Usability Evaluation for Quality Management in e-Learning Contents Development. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 15(3), 180-187.
16 Korea U Learning Federation (2021). E-learning Content Quality Certification Evaluation Criteria. Seoul: Author.
17 J. H. Lee & S. W. Back. (2018). A Study on the Quality Management Strategy of Scientific Cultural Contents. Journal of Creative Information Culture, 4(2), 88-96.
18 S. S. Kim. (2021). A survey of college students' satisfaction with remote lectures. Unofficial handouts. Special graduate school, Joongbu university.
19 Ministry of Education. (2020. 9). A survey on remote classes. handouts. Sejong: Author.
20 J. A. Martilla & J. C. James. (1997). Improtance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79.   DOI
21 Y. J. Joo & N. Y. Kim. (2008). Development of measurement tools and verification of good quality for course evaluation at cyber universities. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 12(1), 203-209.
22 S. T. Lee. (2010). Strategy for developing game-type e-learning contents using secondary life (SL) elements. The Journal of Korean Design and Culture, 16(4), 100-107.
23 S. Y. Jang & S. Z. Roh. (2009). Factors influencing the quality of e-learning contents provided by the universities at the learners' perspectives. Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 10(3), 203-210.
24 J. H. Leem, B. R. Lim & E. M. Sung. (2014). Developmental Study on the Quality Certification Standards of Smart Education Contents. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 20(3), 209-216.