Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2022.13.02.235

Design Evaluation of Parent-child Interactive Game Furniture Based on AHP-TOPSIS Method  

Wang, Jiaqi (Department of Smart Experience Design, TED, Kookmin University)
Pan, Younghwan (Department of Smart Experience Design, TED, Kookmin University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Convergence Society / v.13, no.2, 2022 , pp. 235-248 More about this Journal
Abstract
Through the research on the design evaluation index of parent-child interactive game furniture, it is convenient for designers to quantitatively analyze the design advantages and disadvantages of related products, which is of positive help to control and improve the design quality. Combined with AHP and TOPSIS, this study proposes the evaluation model of three design criteria and 26 design indexes. After expert scoring, calculation, and consistency test of each index, the weight value of each design index is obtained, and the index is classified according to the importance of each index. Finally, eight essential indicators, eleven secondary indicators, and seven general indicators are classified. A case study was conducted with TOPSIS, and the design samples of three parent-child climbing game furniture were analyzed. Finally, the three samples' relative proximity was 0.505, 0281, and 0.640, respectively. The research shows that the AHP-TOPSIS method can scientifically and effectively sort and screen the advantages and disadvantages of design schemes and provide a reference for the research and development of related products.
Keywords
Parent-child interactive game; Furniture design evaluation; Evaluation Index; AHP; TOPSIS;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 R. Lukic et al. (2020). Analyzing Financial Performances and Efficiency of The Retail Food in Serbia By Using The AHP-TOPSIS Method, Economics of Agriculture, 67(1), 55-68. DOI : 10.5937/ekopolj2001055l   DOI
2 General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. (2008). General safety technical specification for children's furniture SN_T 2144-2008. Beijing.
3 General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China. (2008). General technical requirements for children's furniture GB 28007-2011. Beijing.
4 S. B. Xu. (1988). Principles of Analytic Hierarchy Process. Tianjin: Tianjin University Press.
5 Y. F. Miao, L. Xu & L. Q. Shen. (2017). Children Furniture Design Based on Parent-child Interaction. China Forest Products Industry, 44(8), 42-46. DOI : 10.19531/j.issn1001-5299.201708010   DOI
6 C. Yang & N. Li. (2016). Analysis On The Key Points of Parent-Child Interactive Furniture Design. Design, 24, 138-140. DOI : 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0069.2016.24.047   DOI
7 Y. Hu & K. M. Huang. (2020). Street Furniture Design Evaluation Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Packaging Engineering, 41(22), 330-334. DOI : 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2020.22.053   DOI
8 L. J. Wang, Y. Ali, S. Nazir & M. Niazi. (2020). ISA Evaluation Framework for Security of Internet of Health Things System Using AHP-TOPSIS Methods, IEEE Access, 8, 152316-152332. DOI : 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221   DOI
9 C. L. Hwang & K. Yoon. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag. DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9   DOI
10 S. Bathrinath, R.K.A. Bhalaji & S. Saravanasankar. (2020). Risk Analysis in Textile Industries Using AHP-TOPSIS. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45(2), 1257-1263. DOI : 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.722   DOI
11 D. A. Norman. (1988). The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
12 X. Wang & Q. Q. Duan. (2019). Improved AHP-TOPSIS Model for The Comprehensive Risk Evaluation of Oil and Gas Pipelines. Petroleum Science, 16,1479-1492. DOI : 10.1007/s12182-019-00365-5   DOI
13 J. Y. Zhu & Q. Wu. (2020). Furniture Design Based on Parent-Child Interaction Experience. 2020 International Conference on Environment and Water Resources Engineering (EWRE 2020). DOI : 10.1051/e3sconf/202017902098   DOI
14 N. Li, X. D. Li & D. F. Tang. (2020). Selection of the Best Sustainable Packaging Design Scheme Based on AHP-TOPSIS, Packaging Engineering, 41(23), 242-248. DOI : 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2020.23.034.   DOI
15 M. Sharma & S. Joshi. (2019). Brand Sustainability Among Young Consumers: An AHP-TOPSIS Approach, Young Consumers, 20(4), 314-337. DOI : 10.1108/yc-12-2018-0914   DOI
16 Y. F. Chen. (2019). Research on Design and Evaluation of Xiamen Tourist Souvenirs Based on AHP-TOPSIS, Master's dissertation, Jinan:Qilu University of Technology.
17 D. A. Norman. (2004). Emotional Design:Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
18 J. L.Frost, S. C. Wortham & S. Reifel. (2004). Play and Child Development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
19 W. Y. Jiang & Y. F. Miao. (2021). Application of Preschool Play Theory in Children's Play Furniture Design. Furniture, 42(1), 44-47. DOI : 10.16610/j.cnki.jiaju.2021.01.010   DOI
20 Z. J. Chen, S. L. Jiang & H. Y. Guan. (2010). Evaluation Model of Furniture Design Scheme Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 46(12), 130-136. DOI : 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20101222   DOI
21 T. Saaty & L. G. Vargas. (2012). How to Make A Decision. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 175, 1-21. DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6_1   DOI
22 W. X. Jin. (2018). Research on furniture product design based on Parent-child interaction experience, Master's dissertation, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan.