Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2020.11.5.209

Abolition of restrictions and research on precondition for nominating drone photographing free area  

Seok, Geum-Chan (Department of Security and Management Engineering Graduate School, Myongji University)
Park, Gye-Soo (Department of Security and Management Engineering Graduate School, Myongji University)
Nam, Soung-Ho (Department of Security and Management Engineering Graduate School, Myongji University)
Kim, Young-Ki (Department of Security and Management Engineering Graduate School, Myongji University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Convergence Society / v.11, no.5, 2020 , pp. 209-217 More about this Journal
Abstract
The background of the research is the following. With the prosperity of drone industry, the government has been actively promoting measures to nominate 'drone photographing free areas'. However, existing laws, and procedures are rather unclear with related environmental factors in discordance with one another. Hence, voices in need for establishing a clear precondition for nominating drone photography free area have been rising. The purpose of the research is to provide measures for the preconditions to establish photography free areas for convenient drone photographing. The research utilizes literary methods, conducting focus group interviews to coordinate with specialists who can participate and discuss so that they can provide improvement measures. The research renders improvement measures in different sectors including 2x items in aviation security law, 8x items in free area nomination and procedure, 4x items in infrastructure establishment and information management area. The expected effects are the following: by attaching drone photography with aviation security law, nominating photography free area can be linked up with the Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Technology. Secondly, by enlarging photography restricted area to upper mid-air, a three dimensional drone security will be possible. Thirdly, by providing a 'Yongin area standard model', free area nomination will become more easy. Future research will focus on enhancing aviation security law regarding drone photographing. In addition, the promotion to nominate free areas for 33x responsible areas in accordance with the National Intelligence service will be required.
Keywords
Drone photographing; Revision of Aviation Security law; military base / key facility protection law revision; National & Military Security Facility; Free area nomination procedure;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 MLIT. (2019). Revision Law for drone promotion and infrastructure establishment (i.e 'drone law').
2 MLIT. (2019). Road map for preemptive measurers to abolish drone related restrictions.
3 NIS. (2017). Manuel for drone and UAV usage for national security facilities (booklet).
4 National Defense Intelligence HQ. (2020). Report on drone photography restriction revolution and development plan.
5 S. Y. Park. (2015). Research on development and nomination process for ultra light flying airfield. Journal of Law Society For Aviation Space Policy, 30(2), 3-36.
6 J. Y. Song. (2018). Research for responding to North Korean UAV & ultra light flying device threat. Military Research Book 146P, 342-367.
7 News Day. (2019). 'Report on drone exclusive airfield.
8 MLIT High tech aviation branch. (2020). Increase usage rate for each area's drone exclusive airfield.
9 H. S. Yun. (2018). Mixed equipment transportation test evaluation & defense industry security procedure improvement research Doctoral degree research Myongji University. Yongin
10 R. A. Krueger. (1986). Focus group interviewing: A helpful technique for agricultural educators. The Visitor, 73(7), 1-4.
11 U. K. Park. (2017). Aviation photography approval system function improvement report Icheon : 7th Corps
12 L. C. Lederman. (1990). Assessing educational effectiveness : The focus group interview as a technique for data collection. Communication Education, 38, 117-127. DOI : 10.1080/03634529009378794   DOI
13 Thomas. L., MacMillan. J., McColl. E., Hale. C. & Bond. S. (1995). Comparison of focus group and individual interview methodology in examining patient satisfaction with nursing care. Social Science in Health, 1, 206-219.
14 Parker. A. & Tritter. J. (2006). Focus group method and methodology: current practice and recent debate. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 29(1), 23-37. DOI 10.1080/01406720500537304   DOI
15 National Defense Intelligence HQ. (2019). Drone flight approval procedure in military responsible airspace.