Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2020.11.4.165

A Study of the Visual Irony of a Painting Using 'Dépaysement'  

Moon, Ji-Hye (Department of Interdisciplinary Program in Studies of Arts, Sungkyunkwan University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Convergence Society / v.11, no.4, 2020 , pp. 165-172 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to primarily explore the characteristics of 'irony' and focus on the process of visualizing it. 'Irony' is one of the rhetorics used to describe the context or situational aspects of writing. This 'Dépaysement' that appears in art history corresponds to 'ironic' rhetoric in writing. 'Dépaysement' is a combination of techniques, which conveys a message through de-familiarizing rhetoric. With the images conflicting with each other in logic on the same canvas. 'Dépaysement' and 'ironic' rhetoric have commonalities in that they produce a situation with opposite or contradictory images and obscure the images and the situation by distorting them into being different from what has usually been known. In conclusion, Ironic Characteristics and Visual technique elements of dépaysement are identical, this study attempts to understand the visual language by analyzing 'the visual irony' that appears in artworks.
Keywords
Irony; Language of vision; $D{\acute{e}}paysement$; Visual Irony; Convergence;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Monthlyart. (1999). World art glossary. Seoul : Monthlyart.
2 National Institute of Korean Language. (1999). Standard korean dictionary. Seoul. National Institute of Korean Language.
3 J. J. Kim. (1981). Irony and style in novel. Cogito, 20, 25-48.
4 S. S. Yoon. (2004). Irony-Der zauberberg of mann tomas, Paju : KSI.
5 J. Y. Kim. (2013). Study on the correlation between the point of narration and irony in novels-focusing on attached works-. Doctoral dissertation. Chung Ang University, Seoul.
6 Y. D. Roh. (2010). The Study On The Aesthetic of Romanticism -Concerning the back ground of its thought and the aesthetic property. Korean Society of Basic Design & Art, 11(6), 197-205.
7 P. U. Hohendahl. (1995). Geschichte der deutschen Literaturkritik. Seoul : Minumsa.
8 J. O. Lee. (2002). L' etude sur les concept d'ironie verbale, French Studies, 23, 283-307.
9 H. Y. Park. (2003). Eine studie uber die romantische ironie von friedrich schlegel. Doctoral dissertation. Hanyang University, Seoul.
10 U. Eco. (2004). Storia della bellezza. Paju : Openbooks.
11 D. C. Muecke. (1986). Irony, Seoul : Seoul National University Press.
12 S. Jurgen. (1995). Zur theorie des modernen romans. Seoul : Moonye.
13 I. H. Kim. (1986). Study of korean literature theory. Seoul : Eulyoo.
14 M. S. Lee. (2014). Movement and genre. Naver [Online]. https://terms.naver.com
15 H. S. Jang, B. P. Hur. (2009). A Study on the de'paysment characteristics in modern architecture - In light of Rene Magritte -. Korean institute of interior design journal, 18(6), 96-103.
16 S. Gablik. (2000). Rene magritte. Seoul : Sigongsa.