Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2020.11.11.103

Study on the Effectiveness of a Graphic Basic Design Course Based on Different Dimensions of Knowledge in a Flipped Classroom  

Cheng, Qin (Dept. of Experience Design, Techno Design, Kookmin University)
Pan, Yonghwan (Dept. of Experience Design, Techno Design, Kookmin University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Convergence Society / v.11, no.11, 2020 , pp. 103-114 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper's research objective is to test educational content with different dimensions of knowledge during a graphic basic design course, while also proposing teaching plans and opinions for courses in flipped classrooms as well as enhancing educational efficiency. It categorizes educational content of courses based on the dimensions of knowledge in the learning objectives of Bloom's taxonomy. 120 students are divided into four experimental groups to respectively under go flipped classroom learning by using different dimensions of knowledge involved in course content. Course pretests and post tests are used to obtain and analyze experimental data. Among this knowledge, factual and conceptual knowledge obtained during extra curricular independent learning as well as programmed and meta-cognitive knowledge obtained during in-class learning from a flipped classroom can stimulate student's learning initiative and also enhance learning efficiency. According to research results and student feedback, this paper will propose targeted categorization methods for course content and also suggest educational strategies for these courses' flipped classroom model.
Keywords
Flipped classroom; Graphic basic design course; Dimensions of knowledge; Design Education;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 H. B. Long. (1989). Contradictory Expectations Achievementand Satisfactionin Adult Learning. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 3, 10-12. DOI : 10.1080/07377366.1985.10401035   DOI
2 Jeanne, Ellis & Ormrod, (2011). Human Learning (6th edition).
3 Anderson & Krathwohl. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing, New York: Longman. DOI : 10.1093/ehr/114.458.1013,
4 L. hongxia, Z. wei & l. shiping. (2015). A study on the intervention of college students' learning self-efficacy in a seamless learning environment. Modern distance education, 2015, 59-65
5 R. Schwarzer & Jerusalem. (1995). Replicates the General Self-Efficacy Scale.
6 Michael A. Christiansen. (2014). Inverted teaching: Applying a new pedagogy to a university organic chemistry class. Journal of Chemical Education, 1845-1850. DOI : 10.1021/ed400530z   DOI
7 S. J. Chung. (2017) The Effect of Flipped Classroom on Learning Outcome and Students' Learning Preference in a Large General Education Class. Korean Journal of General Education, 12, 359-390.
8 Jacob Enfield. (2013). Looking at the Impact of the Flipped Classroom Model of Instruction on Undergraduate Multimedia Students at CSUN. Tech Trends, 11(1), p.14-27 DOI : 10.1007/s11528-013-0698-1   DOI
9 Y. H. Wang. (2003). The effects of group discussion on EFL reading comprehension instruction. Master dissertation.
10 L. Ruilin & J. C. Xie. (2010). Visual Point-Line-Plane Design of Chinese Idioms. International Journal of Technology and Engineering Education, 2010,. 8.
11 N. Adhuwaykh. (2016). Educational teaching method for schools: The Concept of Flipped Classroom, http://aljubailtoday.com.sa/2013/10/10/31871.html
12 Q. Wang. (2014). The essence and application of "mooc", "micro-course" and "flipped classroom. Shanghai education and scientific research, 15-18.
13 McKay. (1956). B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of educational objectives, Vol. 1: Cognitive domain.
14 R. Lister. (2001). Objectives and objective assessment in cs. Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 3(1), 292-296. DOI : 10.1145/364447.364605   DOI
15 T. Scott. (2003). Bloom's taxonomy applied to testing in computer science classes, Compute. Sci. Coll, 19(1), p.267-274