Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2019.10.12.487

Technology Acceptance and Influencing Factor of Anatomy Learning using Augmented Reality :Usability Based on the Technology Acceptance Model  

An, Jiwon (Department of Nursing, Far East University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Convergence Society / v.10, no.12, 2019 , pp. 487-494 More about this Journal
Abstract
Augmented reality (AR) or virtual reality is suitable to apply the contents of a textbook so as to be directly observable by learners. This study aimed to examine the applicability and technology acceptance of anatomy learning using AR in nursing students. This study was conducted in May 2019 with 17 nursing students who studied an anatomy textbook using AR and answered a questionnaire about technology acceptance and the usability of AR in combination with the anatomy textbook. Perceived usefulness was identified as an influencing factor on technology acceptance with 51.2% acceptance rate and thus should be taken into consideration in the development of learning strategies using new technological learning methods.
Keywords
Augmented reality; Technology Acceptance Model; Usability; Anatomy learning; Nursing education;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 S. H. Jang & B. K. Kye. (2007). Educational application of augmented reality contents. The Korea Contents Association Review, 5(2), 79-85.   DOI
2 A. Dunser & E. Hornecker. (2007, February). Lessons from an AR book study. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction (pp. 179-182). ACM.
3 M. Aebersold, T. Voepel-Lewis, L. Cherara, M. Weber, C. Khouri, R. Levine & A. R. Tait. (2018). Interactive Anatomy-Augmented Virtual Simulation Training. Clin Simul Nurs, 15, 34-41. DOI : 10.1016/j.ecns.2017.09.008   DOI
4 R. Barmaki et al. (2019). Enhancement of Anatomical Education Using Augmented Reality: An Empirical Study of Body Painting. Anat Sci Educ . DOI : 10.1002/ase.1858
5 R. Agarwal & J. Prasad. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204-215. DOI : 10.1287/isre.9.2.204   DOI
6 K. Lee. (2012). The Future of Learning and Training in Augmented Reality. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 7, 31-42.   DOI
7 S. S. Jamali, M. F. Shiratuddin, K. W. Wong & C. L. Oskam. (2015). Utilising Mobile-Augmented Reality for Learning Human Anatomy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 659-668. DOI : 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.054   DOI
8 F. D. Davis. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. DOI : 10.2307/249008   DOI
9 V. Venkatesh & F. D. Davis. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204. DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926   DOI
10 V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis & F. D. Davis. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425-478. DOI : 10.2307/30036540
11 E. M. Rogers. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (3rd Ed.). NY: Simon and Schuster.
12 R. C. M. Yusoff, A. Ahmad & H. B. Zaman. (2011). Evaluation of user acceptance of mixed reality technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(8 ).
13 D. Kugelmann et al. (2018). An Augmented Reality magic mirror as additive teaching device for gross anatomy. Ann Anat, 215, 71-77. DOI : 10.1016/j.aanat.2017.09.011   DOI
14 Y. L. Theng, C. M. L. Lim, W. Liu & A. D. Cheok. (2007). Mixed reality systems for learning. A pilot study understanding user perceptions and acceptance. In Proceedings of HCI (14) (pp. 728-737). Heidelberg: Springer Berlin. DOI :10.1007/978-3-540-73335-5_7
15 M. A. Birkett & S. J. Day. (1994). Internal pilot studies for estimating sample size. Statistics in Medicine, 13, 2455-2463.   DOI
16 S. A. Julious. (2005). Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 4, 287-291. DOI : 10.1002/pst.185   DOI
17 DEVAR. (2018). Anatomy: Human body, Encyclopedia in augmented reality, New York : DEVAR Entertainment, LLC.
18 S. Cho, Y. Jeong & C. Oh. (2018). A Study on the Improvement of the Supporting Policy Efficiendy through the Analysis of the Demand for Direct Commercialization of Technology in Universities and Research Institutes. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 8(5), 229-236. DOI : 10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.5.229
19 DEVAR. (2018). Anatomy: Human organs, Encyclopedia in augmented reality, New York : DEVAR Entertainment, LLC.
20 R. Azuma, M. Billinghurst & G. Klinker. (2011). Special Section on Mobile Augmented Reality. Computers & Graphics, 35 (4), vii-viii. DOI : 10.1016/j.cag.2011. 05.002   DOI
21 I. Cho. (2019). Structural study on storytelling of VR contents. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(1), 295-300. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2019.17.1.295   DOI
22 M. Billinghurst & A. Duenser. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56-63.   DOI
23 H. Lee, S. A. Cha & H. N. Kwon. (2016). Study on the Effect of Augmented Reality Contents-Based Instruction for Adult Learners on Academic Achievement, Interest and Flow. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(1), 424-437. DOI : 10.5392/jkca.2016.16.01.424   DOI
24 C. Ferguson, P. M.. Davidson, P. J. Scott, D/ Jackson & L. D. Hickman. (2015). Augmented reality, virtual reality and gaming: an integral part of nursing. Contemp Nurse, 51(1), 1-4. DOI :10.1080/10376178.2015.1130360   DOI
25 K. H. Noh, H. K. Jee & S. Lim. (2010). Effect of Augmented Reality Contents Based Instruction on Academic Achievement, Interest and Flow of Learning. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 10(2), 1-13. DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.2.001   DOI
26 H. K. Wu, S. W. Lee, H. Y. Chang & J. C. Liang. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & education, 62, 41-49. DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024   DOI