Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.6.321

A Convergence Study for University Students' Perception and Satisfaction on Syllabus  

Park, Ok-Hee (Ju Si Gyeong Liberal Arts College, Pai Chai University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Convergence Society / v.9, no.6, 2018 , pp. 321-327 More about this Journal
Abstract
The study aims to investigate university students' perception of syllabus and their satisfaction of its components. A survey was conducted of the whole student body in a university located in Daejeaon city. 996 students answered the questionnaire. The findings of the study are as follows: Females or upper grade students showed a more positive response to the syllabus than males or lower grade students. The group who positively perceived satisfaction of the syllabus showed less satisfaction of the syllabus components. The subjects evaluated the details or directions of the categories of Exams, Assignment, and Instructors' information were insufficient or incorrect. The pedagogical implications and suggestions for syllabus are also discussed.
Keywords
Syllabus; Component of syllabus; Students' perception for syllabus; Students' satisfaction for components of syllabus; Survey & interview for participants;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 L. B. Nilson. (2003). Teaching at its best. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company, INC.
2 J. M. Stattery & J. F. Carlson. (2005). Preparing an effective syllabus: Current best practice. College Teaching, 53(4), 159-164.   DOI
3 K. Matejka & L. B. Kurke. (1994). Designing a great syllabus, College Teaching, 42(3), 115-118.   DOI
4 H. R. Jung. (2007). Un analysis of undergraduate course syllabus and development of models, Ph.D. dissertation, Yeonsei University, Seoul.
5 J. Parkers & M. Harris. (2002). The purpose of syllabus. College Teaching, 50(2), 55-61.   DOI
6 S. Y. Jeon. (1997). University Curriculum and courses. Seoul: Hakjisa.
7 http://media.daum.net/society/others/newsview?newsid=20070613093308335.
8 http://view.asiae.co.kr/news/view.htm?idxno=2010011408190079935&nvr=Y
9 I. S. Choi, H. S. Lee, G. H. Lee & S. J. Kim. (2012). A detailed analysis of creativity courses provided by prestigious Korean universities. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(2), 179-199.   DOI
10 H. S. Kim & H. S. Kim. (2009). Dynamic syllabus composition system considering the priority of educational objectives. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 12(2), 13-22.
11 S. Y. Kim. (1991). Strategy of the Usage and Development of the Curriculum. Higher Education, 49(1), 101-105.
12 H. S. Chung & J. M. Kim. (2015). Design of semantic models for teaching and learning based on convergence of ontology technology. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 6(3), 127-134. DOI: 10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.3.127.   DOI
13 S. H. Kang & E. J. Lee. (2013). A Study of Learner's Usage and Satisfaction by the Levels of Perception of the Course Syllabus: in a Graduate School of Education, Journal of educational studies, 44(1), 31-61.
14 M. J. Oh. (2016). Study on professors' and students' perception of the specificity of syllabus. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(11), 29-46. DOI: 10.22251/JLCCI. 2016.16.11.29   DOI
15 S. H. Lee. (1987). University Curriculum. Seoul: Yonsei University Press.
16 E. J. Ryu & J. H. Park. (2013). A study on the students' satisfaction and utilization related to the syllabus-based on the beauty related department in the 4-year university. Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture, 19(2), 102-111.
17 J. Y. Park, S. W. Kim, W. H. Moon, O. K. Park, G, B. Lee & I. S. Choi. (2017). Standardized syllabus development report. Daejeon: Pai Chai University Press.