Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.3.061

The Competitive Efforts of ICT Providers in the Perspective of General Purpose Technology  

Hong, Hee-Jung (The Graduate School of Yonsei University Management of Technology)
Jung, Jae-Won (The Graduate School of Yonsei University Management of Technology)
Lee, Jung-Hoon (Graduate School of Information, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Convergence Society / v.9, no.3, 2018 , pp. 61-71 More about this Journal
Abstract
The research analysis will be proceeded with a specific question: The kind of endeavors the ICT providers must focus on within the ICT industry's Schumpeterian pattern of using barriers of knowledge during the rapid technological transformation and pursuing appropriability of guaranteed opportunities. The study was carried out by targeting and conducting empirical observations on the proliferation of technological patent applications made by ICT companies among approximately 5,700 listed North American corporations. The risk of arising cases, in which late-coming non-ICT companies adopt and participate in the technical pertinence and concept derived from the technological advent, will be treated as an independent variable in a survival analysis. Through this analysis, innovative technological attempts and absorption capabilities indicate significance.
Keywords
ICT; technological innovation; technological innovative distance; absorptive capacity; technological niche;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 W. T. Robinson. (1990). Product innovation and start-up business market share performance. Management science 36(10), 1279-1289.   DOI
2 E. Mansfield. (1993). The diffusion of flexible manufacturing systems in Japan, Europe and the United States. Management science 39(2), 149-159.   DOI
3 M. Fishbein & I. Ajzen (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
4 S. G. Winter & R. R. Nelson. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
5 S. Wuyts, et al. (2005). Empirical tests of optimal cognitive distance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 58(2), 277-302.   DOI
6 B. Nooteboom, et al. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy 36(7), 1016-1034.   DOI
7 L. Vygotsky. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children 23(3), 34-41.
8 N. Rosenberg & M. Trajtenberg. (2001). A General purpose technology at work: the Corliss steam engine in the late 19th Century US, National Bureau of Economic Research.
9 W. M. Cohen & D. A. Levinthal. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly: 128-152.
10 H. F. Harlow. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological review 56(1), 51.   DOI
11 F. Malerba & L. Orsenigo. (1995). Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Cambridge Journal of Economics 19(1), 47-65.
12 L Fleming, (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management science 47(1), 117-132.   DOI
13 J. M. Podolny, et al. (1996). Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984-1991. American Journal of Sociology: 659-689.
14 P. D. Allison. (2010). Survival analysis using SAS: a practical guide, Sas Institute.
15 Song, et al. (1996). Survival Analysis, Cheongmungak.
16 D. G. Kleinbaum. (1998). Survival Analysis, a Self-Learning Text. Biometrical Journal 40(1), 107-108.   DOI
17 T. E. Stuart & J. M. Podolny. (1996). Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic management journal 17(S1), 21-38.
18 A. B. Jaffe, et al. (1992). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, National Bureau of Economic Research.
19 H. J. No, et al. (2014). A structured approach to explore knowledge flows through technology-based business methods by integrating patent citation analysis and text mining. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
20 E. C. Engelsman & A. F. van Raan. (1994). A patent-based cartography of technology. Research Policy 23(1), 1-26.   DOI
21 G. Salton & M. J. McGill. (1986). Introduction to modern information retrieval.
22 J. M. Podolny & T. E. Stuart. (1995). A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change. American Journal of Sociology 100(4), 1224-1260.   DOI
23 H. Schildt, et al. (2012). The temporal effects of relative and firm-level absorptive capacity on interorganizational learning. Strategic management journal 33(10), 1154-1173.   DOI
24 S. A. Zahra & G. George (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of management review 27(2), 185-203.   DOI
25 P. Davis. (1990). The dynamo and the computer. The American Economic Review 80(2), 355-361.
26 G. Todorova & B. Durisin. (2007). Absorptive capacity: valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of management review 32(3), 774-786.   DOI
27 J. Sall, et al. (2005). JMP start statistics, JSTOR.
28 D. Schoenfeld (1982). Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika 69(1), 239-241.   DOI
29 S. Kaplan & M. Tripsas. (2008). Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Research Policy 37(5), 790-805.   DOI
30 J. G. March. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.. Organization Science 2(1), 71-87.   DOI
31 T. F. Bresnahan & M. Trajtenberg. (1995). General purpose technologies 'Engines of growth. Journal of econometrics 65(1), 83-108.   DOI
32 P. A. David & G. Wright. (1999). General Purpose Technologies and Surges in Productivity: Historical Reflections on the Future of the ICT Revolution.
33 B. Jovanovic & P. L. Rousseau. (2005). General purpose technologies. Handbook of economic growth 1: 1181-1224.
34 T. F. Bresnahan & S. Greenstein. (2001). The economic contribution of information technology: towards comparative and user studies. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 11(1): 95-118.   DOI
35 F. Malerba & L. Orsenigo. (1996). Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific. Research Policy 25(3), 451-478.   DOI
36 N. Corrocher et al. (2007). Schumpeterian patterns of innovative activity in the ICT field.. Research Policy 36(3), 418-432.   DOI
37 R. T. Frambach & N. Schillewaert. (2002). Organizational innovation adoption: A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research 55(2), 163-176.   DOI
38 R. E. Kraut, et al. (1998). Varieties of social influence: The role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organization Science 9(4), 437-453.   DOI
39 M. L. Markus. (1987). Toward a "critical mass" theory of interactive media universal access, interdependence and diffusion. Communication research 14(5), 491-511.   DOI
40 M. L. Katz & C. Shapiro. (1994). Systems competition and network effects. The Journal of Economic Perspective, 93-115.
41 E. J. Hultink, E. J. (1997). Industrial new product launch strategies and product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14(4), 243-257.   DOI
42 R. T. Frambach, et al. (1998). Adoption of a service innovation in the business market: an empirical test of supply-side variables. Journal of Business Research 41(2), 161-174.   DOI
43 C. Easingwood & C. Beard. (1989). High technology launch strategies in the UK. Industrial Marketing Management 18(2), 125-138.   DOI
44 T. S. Robertson & H. Gatignon. (1986). Competitive effects on technology diffusion. The Journal of Marketing, 1-12.
45 E. M. Rogers. (2010). Diffusion of innovations, Simon and Schuster.
46 L. E. Ostlund. (1974). Perceived innovation attributes as predictors of innovativeness. Journal of consumer Research: 23-29.
47 L. G. Tornatzky & K. J. Klein. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on(1), 28-45.
48 S. L. Holak, et al. (1987). The role of expectations in the adoption of innovative consumer durables: Some preliminary evidence. Journal of Retailing.