Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2019.22.3.005

Analysis of LEGO Mindstorm Activity Levels Based on the Van Hiele Levels of Development in Geometry  

Rim, Haemee (Kongju National University)
Choi, Inseo (Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society / v.22, no.3, 2019 , pp. 257-275 More about this Journal
Abstract
Technology-based convergence education is being emphasized for students in the era of the fourth industrial revolution. In math education, students need to increase their capabilities in the future by having them experience mathematical problems using robots and sensors, a key technology in the era of the fourth industrial revolution. To this end, it is necessary to present educational uses for educational robots in relation to math and curriculum from a 'mathematics education perspective' and analyze its educational use in relation to the mathematics and curriculum, considering the role of mathematics at the base of the process of exploring real-world phenomena and solving problems. Based on the analysis of Van Hiele levels of development in geometry and the LOGO activity level of Olson et al.(1987), this study analyzed and presented the level of LEGO Mindstorm activity, a representative educational Robot capable of collecting and analyzing data and programming in the form of block language, in the first to fourth level.
Keywords
Van Hiele Levels of Development in Geometry; Robot; LEGO Mindstorm; LOGO;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김철(2012). 로봇교육 관련 국내 연구동향 및 교육효과 분석. 한국정보교육학회 논문지, 16(2), 233-243.
2 김화경(2006). '컴퓨터와 수학교육' 학습-지도 환경에 관한 연구. 수학교육연구, 16(4), 367-386.
3 박경미 외 42인 (2015). 2015 개정 수학과 교육과정 시안 개발 연구 II. 교육부, 한국과학창의재단 연구보고 BD15110002.
4 손은정(1991). LOGO학습이 VAN - HIELE수준과 문제해결에 미치는 영향. 이화여자대학교 석사학위 논문.
5 우정호(2017). 학교수학의 역사-발생적 접근. 서울: 서울대학교출판문화원.
6 임해미, 최인선, 노선숙(2014). 논리,비판적 사고 신장을 위한 로봇 프로그래밍의 수학교육 적용 방안. 수학교육, 53(3), 413-434.
7 장혜원(1991). LOGO 언어의 수학교육적 고찰: van Hiele의 기하 학습 수준과 장의존-장독립 인지 양식이 LOGO 학습에 미치는 영향을 중심으로. 서울대학교 석사학위 논문.
8 조미옥(1991). LOGO 프로그래밍의 안내적 교수법을 통한 인지적 모니터링 전략의 발달. 교육공학연구, 7(1), 161-180.
9 황연주(2006). 초등학교 기하도형 지도에서 van Hiele 수준이론을 근거로 하는 LOGO 프로그래밍 활용에 관한 연구. 연세대학교 석사학위 논문.
10 황혜정, 나귀수, 최승현, 박경미, 임재훈, 서동엽(2016). 수학교육학신론. 서울: 문음사.
11 Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism: What's the difference. Future of learning group publication, 5(3), 438.
12 Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 63-71.
13 Crowley, M. L. (1987). The van Hiele Model of the Development of Geometric Thought. In Mary. M. L. (Ed.) Learning and Teaching Gemretry, K-12, 1987 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp.1-16). Reston, Va.: National. Council af Teachers af Mathematics.
14 Eguchi, A. (2014). Educational robotics for promoting 21st century skills. Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems, 8(1), 5-11.   DOI
15 Olson, A. T., Kieren, T. E., & Ludwig, S. (1987). Linking LOGO, levels and language in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18(4), 359-370.   DOI
16 Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorm: children, computers, and powerful ideas, NY: New York, Basic Books.
17 Pea, R. D. & Kurland, D. M. (1983). On the Cognitive Prerequisites of Learning Computer Programming.. New Ideas in Psychology, 2, 137-168.   DOI
18 Ucgul, M., & Cagiltay, K. (2014). Design and development issues for educational robotics training camps. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(2), 203-222.   DOI
19 Usiskin, Z. (1982). Van Hiele Levels and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry. CDASSG Project. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
20 Van Hiele, P. M. (1959). The child's thought and geometry. English translation of selected writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre M. van Hiele, Washington DC: NSF.
21 Van Hiele-Geldof, D. (1957). The didactics of geometry in the lowest class of Secondary School (tesis doctoral). Universidad de Utrecht: Utrecht, Holanda).(Traduccion al ingles en Fuys, 1-206.
22 Whitman, L. E., & Witherspoon, T. L. (2003). Using legos to interest high school students and imtrove k12 stem education. In fie (pp. F3A6-10). IEEE.
23 Williams, K., Igel, I., Poveda, R., Kapila, V., & Iskander, M. (2012). Enriching K-12 Science and Mathematics Education Using LEGOs. Advances in Engineering Education, 3(2), 1-27.
24 Yousuf, M. A., Montúfar, R., & Cueva, V. (2006). Robotic projects to enhance student participation, motivation and learning. In Fourth International Conference on Multimedia, Information and Communication Technologies in Education (Vol. 6, No. 1, p. 1989).