Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2018.21.3.001

Investigating Korean Students' Different Profiles of Affective Constructs and Engagements: A Latent Profile Analysis on TIMSS 2015  

Hwang, Jihyun (The University of Iowa)
Ko, Eun-Sung (Jeonju National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society / v.21, no.3, 2018 , pp. 207-225 More about this Journal
Abstract
Large-scale international comparison studies for a decade have shown Korean students' negative affective constructs and engagement. In addition to this general finding, this research aimed to provide details in Korean students' affective constructs and engagement. With the latent profile analysis, we found five groups of individuals showing qualitatively different characteristics in their affective constructs and engagement. Particularly, it is required to pay more attentions to two groups with relatively negative views on engaging teaching in mathematics lessons. The findings in this research suggested that different approaches could be required to improve affective constructs and engagement in each group. This necessitated further research on achievement and influential factors on each group's characteristics of affective constructs and engagement.
Keywords
Latent profile analysis; mathematics; Korean 8th-graders; TIMSS 2015; Affective constructs; Engagements;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김소희(2015). 수학적.수학외적 의사소통을 통한 수업이 학생의 인지적.정의적 영역 발달에 미치는 효과. 고려대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
2 김정원, 김병숙(2004). 학생이 지각한 교사특성과 학문적 자아개념 및 학습태도와의 관계. 아동교육, 13(2), 253-262.
3 김희진(2014). 놀이를 활용한 수학 학습이 중학생의 수학적 태도에 미치는 영향 분석. 한국외국어대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
4 박맹구(2001). 중.고등학생이 지각한 교사행동과 자아개념 및 학습태도와의 관계 연구. 원광대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
5 이미영(2007). 초등학생의 교사 행동지각, 학업성취 관련 변인 및 학업 성취도의 관계. 충남대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
6 이민찬, 길양숙(1998). 수학 학습에 영향을 미치는 정의적 특성의 학년별 변화 및 성별, 성취집단별 차이. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈A 수학교육, 37(2), 147-158.
7 이영선(2017). 스마트폰 어플리케이션을 활용한 수학 수업이 학생들의 정의적 영역에 미치는 영향: 함수내용을 중심으로. 고려대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
8 이종필(2010). 중학교3 학년 학생 수학학습의 도.농간 정의적 특성 연구. 공주대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
9 이종희, 김선희(2010). 중고등학교 학생들의 수학 정의적 성취의 차이 분석. 교과교육학연구, 14(4), 759-785.
10 이희숙, 정제영, 선미숙(2016). 교육자원 투입에 따른 청소년의 학업성취 효과에 대한 메타적 접근-교사변인을 중심으로-, 청소년학연구, 23(4), 425-450.
11 조광규(1997). 교사행동에 대한 학생의 지각이 학습동기 및 학업성취에 미치는 영향. 전남대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
12 주미경(2010). 수학에 대한 정의적 특성 개선을 위한 수업 원리 및 사례. 수학에 대한 정의적 특성 개선 방안 탐색 세미나 연구자료 ORM2010-58(pp.139-154).
13 최권, 전민재, 안효영, 진하늘, 도승이(2013). 중학생이 지각한 교사 및 교우 관계가 수업참여를 매개로 학업성취에 미치는 영향. 아시아교육연구, 14(4), 281-306.
14 최지혜(2014). 교사 지도성이 초등학생의 학업성취도에 미치는 영향에 관한 다층분석. 초등교육연구, 27(3), 163-187.
15 한국교육과정평가원(2016). 수학.과학성취도 추이 변화 국제비교 연구: 결과분석. 연구보고 RRE 2016-15-1.
16 Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52(3), 317-332. doi:10.1007/BF02294359   DOI
17 이영주(1999). 초등학교 고학년 아동의 정의적 특성, 수학적 문제해결력, 추론능력간의 관계. 한국교원대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
18 Akey, T. M. (2006). School context, student attitudes and behavior, and academic achievement: An exploratory analysis. New York, NY: MDRC.
19 Atweh B., Clarkson P., & Nebres B. (2003). Mathematics education in international and global contexts. In: Bishop A.J., Clements M.A., Keitel C., Kilpatrick J., Leung F.K.S. (eds), Second international handbook of mathematics education: Springer International Handbooks of Education(pp. 158-229). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer
20 Celeux, C., & Soromenho, G. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13, 195-212.   DOI
21 Choi, K., Choi, T., & McAninch, M. (2012). A comparative investigation of the presence of psychological condition in high achieving eighth graders from TIMSS 2007 mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 189-199.   DOI
22 Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2015). The construct of attitude in mathematics education. In B. Pepin & B. Roesken-Winter (Eds.), From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education: Exploring a mosaic of relationships and interactions (pp. 51-72). Cham, Switzerland:Springer.
23 Coppola, C., Di Martino, P., Pacelli, T., & Sabena, C. (2012). Primary teachers' affect: a crucial variable in the teaching of mathematics. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 17(3-4), 101-118.
24 Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2010). 'Me and maths': Towards a definition of attitude grounded on students' narratives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,13, 27-48. doi:10.1007/s10857-009-9134-z   DOI
25 Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2011). Attitude toward mathematics: A bridge between beliefs and emotions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43, 471-482. doi:10.1007/s11858-011-0309-6   DOI
26 Eklof, H. (2007). Self-concept and valuing of mathematics in TIMSS 2003: Scale structure and relation to performance in a Swedish setting. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(3), 297-313.   DOI
27 Grunschel, C., Patrzek, J., & Fries, S. (2013). Exploring different types of academic delayers: Alatent profile analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 225-233. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.014   DOI
28 Lo,Y., Mendell, N.R., & Rubin,D.B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767-778. doi:10.1093/biomet/88.3.767   DOI
29 Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26-47.   DOI
30 Marsh, H. W., Ludtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. S. (2009). Classical la tent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person-and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, (2), 191-225. doi:10.1080/10705510902751010   DOI
31 Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Hooper, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods and Procedures in TIMSS 2015. Chestnet Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
32 McLachlan, G. J. (1987). On bootstrapping the likelihood ratio test stastistic for the number of components in a normal mixture. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 36(3), 318-324.
33 Mcleod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575-596). New York, NY: Macmillan.
34 Mcleod, D. B. (1994). Research on affect and mathematics learning in the JRME: 1970 to present. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(6), 637-647.   DOI
35 Mullis, I. V. S., & Martin, M. O. (Eds.). (2013). TIMSS 2015 Assessment Framework. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
36 Muthen, L., & Muthen, B. (1998). MPlus (version 7.3) [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
37 Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagment. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools(pp. 11-39). New York, NY: Teachers' College Press.
38 Schwabe, L., & Wolf, O. T. (2010). Learning under stress impairs memory formation. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 93(2), 183-188. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2009.09.009   DOI
39 Opdenakker, M.-C., Maulana, R., & den Brok, P. (2012). Teacher-student interpersonal relati onships and academic motivation within one school year: Developmental changes and link age. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(1), 95-119. doi:10.1080/09243453.2011.619198   DOI
40 Papanastasiou, C., & Papanastasiou, E. C. (2006). Modeling mathematics achievement in Cypr us. In S. J. Howie & T. Plomp (Eds.), Contexts of learning mathematics and science: Lessons learned from TIMSS(pp. 113-125). New York, NY: Routledge
41 Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the Dimension of a Model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461-464.   DOI
42 Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52(3), 333-343. doi:10.1007/BF02294360   DOI
43 Shen, C., & Tam, H. P. (2008). The paradoxical relationship between student achievement and self-perception: A cross-national analysis based on three waves of TIMSS data. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(1), 87-100. doi: 10.1080/13803610801896653   DOI
44 Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145.   DOI
45 Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332. doi:10.1080/00220670209596607   DOI
46 Thomson, S., & Fleming, N. (2004). Summing it up: Mathematics achievement in Australian schools in TIMSS 2003. (TIMSS Australia Monograph No. 6). Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
47 Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581.   DOI
48 Skinner, E. A., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kndermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765-781. doi:10.1037/a0012840   DOI
49 Stroet, K., Opdenakker, M.-C., & Minnaert, A. (2013). Effects of need supportive teaching on early adolescents' motivation and engagement: A review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 9, 65-87. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.003   DOI
50 Wilkins, J. L. M. (2004). Mathematics and science self-concept: An international investigation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(4), 331-346. doi:10.3200/JEXE.72.4.331-346   DOI
51 Yoshino, A. (2012). The relationship between self-concept and achievement in TIMSS 2007:A comparison between American and Japanese students. International Review of Education, 58(2), 199-219.   DOI
52 Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. S. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 113-121. doi:10.1007/s10649-006-9028-2   DOI