Browse > Article

International Comparative Analysis on East Asian Top Level Countries' Mathematics Achievements in PISA 2012 Results  

Rim, Haemee (Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society / v.19, no.4, 2016 , pp. 441-457 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze Korean students' mathematics achievement characteristics and draw implications for better math education in schools through comparing the results of three east Asian top level countries, Korea, Singapore, and Japan in PISA 2012 results. As a results, the rate of correct answers of Korea students was relatively low compared with those of Singapore, but relatively higher than Japan. From the results of effect size, similar results from t-test was discovered. As shown in analysis according to sub-elements in math assessment framework, the Korean students had low effect size in every sub-elements than Singapore. and they had high effect size at most of sub-elements than Japan, except "personal" context. In top performing level(above level 5), the Korean students had high effect size at "quantities" in mathematical contents, and "employ" in mathematical processes compared with Singapore. And they had row effect size at 6 sub-elements compared with Japan.
Keywords
International comparative study; PISA 2012; Singapore; Japan;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 구자옥, 김성숙, 임해미, 박혜영, 한정아(2015). OECD 국제 학업성취도 평가 연구: PISA 2012 상위국 성취 특성 및 교육맥락변인 영향력 비교 분석. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRE 2015-6-1.
2 송미영, 임해미, 최혁준, 박혜영, 손수경(2013). OECD 국제 학업성취도 평가 연구: PISA 2012 결과 보고서. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRE 2013-6-1.
3 이정규, 박춘성(2009). 국가별 영재교육정책과 영재성에 대한 비교 연구: 일본 영재교육의 발전 방향. 한국일본교육학연구, 13(2), 1-18.
4 임해미, 김부미(2014). 일본과 우리나라의 수학과 교육과정과 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 비교. 학교수학, 16(2), 259-283.
5 조윤동, 윤용식(2014). 핵심 역량 육성의 관점에서 비교한 한국과 일본의 수학과 교육과정. 수학교육학연구, 24(1), 45-65.
6 OECD (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD.
7 최혁준(2015). 한국, 일본, 핀란드의 PISA 2012 과학 결과 비교. 교원교육, 31(3), 370-399.
8 키타하라 카즈오 외(2008). 과학 기술의 지혜 프로젝트 수리과학 전문부회 보고서. 한국과학창의재단.
9 OECD (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: executive summary. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf
10 OECD (2014a). Lessons from PISA for Korea, Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education. OECD Publishing.
11 OECD (2014b). PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do-Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science (Vol. I, Revised Edition). OECD Publishing
12 Singapore Ministry of Education (2006). Secondary Mathematics Syllabuses.
13 Singapore Ministry of Education (2012). Primary Mathematics Teaching and Learning Syllabus.
14 조지민, 동효관, 옥현진, 임해미, 정혜경, 손수경, 배제성(2012). OECD 국제 학업성취도 비교 연구: PISA 2012 본검사 시행보고서. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRE 2012-3-1.