Browse > Article

An Analysis on the Elementary Students' Problem Solving Process in the Intuitive Stages  

Lee, Daehyun (Gwangju National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society / v.18, no.3, 2015 , pp. 241-258 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to examine the students' mathematics problem solving process in the intuitive stages. For this, researcher developed the questionnaire which consisted of problems in relation to intuitive and algorithmic problem solving. 73 fifth grade and 66 sixth grade elementary students participated in this study. I got the conclusion as follows: Elementary students' intuitive problem solving ability is very low. The rate of algorithmic problem solving is higher than that of intuitive problem solving in number and operation areas. The rate of intuitive problem solving is higher in figure and measurement areas. Students inclined to solve the problem intuitively in that case there is no clue for algorithmic solution. So, I suggest the development of problems which can be solved in the intuitive stage and the preparation of the methods to experience the insight and intuition.
Keywords
Problem solving; Intuitive stage; Pre-intuitive stage; Algorithmic stage;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 경익선(역)(1997). 산수 100가지 난문.기문. 서울: 전파과학사.
2 교육과학기술부(2011). 수학과 교육과정. 교육과학기술부.
3 김영아, 김성준(2013). 초등학생들의 문제해결전략에 따른 오류 유형 분석. 한국학교수학회논문집, 16(1), 113-139.
4 김창일, 전영주(2014). 예비 수학교사의 수학교육학 키워드 중심 학습 효과. 한국학교수학회 논문집, 17(4), 493-506.
5 김해규(2012). 수학 문제해결과정에서 보이는 초등교사의 직관 수준에 관한 연구. 학교수학, 14(4), 579-598.
6 온기찬(2001). 직관적 사고와 교육. 서울: 학지사.
7 윤여주, 강신포, 김성준(2010). 시각화가 초등기하문제해결에 미치는 영향. 한국학교수학회논문집, 13(4), 655-677.
8 이대현(2001). 수학 문제해결 과정에서 고등학생들의 직관적 사고의 분석. 한국교원대학교 박사학위논문.
9 이대현(2010). 초등학생들의 문제해결 과정에서 직관의 특징에 의한 영향 분석. 한국초등수학교육학회지, 14(2), 197-215.
10 이대현(2011). 초등수학에서 직관적 원리에 의한 교육 내용 분석. 한국초등수학교육학회지, 15(2), 283-300.
11 이대현(2014). 직관적 수준에서 초등 예비교사들의 문제해결 과정 분석. 학교수학, 16(4), 691-708.
12 전평국, 박성선(2009). 수학교육연구방법-이론과 실제-. 서울: 교우사.
13 한명수(역)(1994). 수학 퍼즐 랜드. 서울: 전파과학사.
14 Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1981). Mathematical Experience. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
15 Ervynck, G. (1991). Mathematical Creativity. In D. Tall(Ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking(pp.42-53), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16 Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics: An Educational Approach. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publisching Company.
17 Hadamard, J. (1945). An essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Priceton university press, Princeton.
18 Hersh, R. (1997). What is Mathematics, Really? 허민(역)(2003). 도대체 수학이란 무엇인가? 서울: 경문사.
19 Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in School Children. The University of Chicago Press.
20 Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring Mathematical Creativity Using Multiple Solution Tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu(Eds.), Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students(pp. 129-145). Sense Publishers.
21 Poincare, H. (1908). Science et Methode. 김형보, 오병승(공역) (1982). 과학의 방법. 서울: 단대출판부.
22 Tall, D. (1991). The Psychology of Advanced Mathematical Thinking. In Tall, D. (Ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking(pp. 3-21). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
23 Tirosh, D. (1991). The Role of Students' Intuitions of Infinity in Teaching the Cantorian Theory. In Tall, D. (Ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking(pp. 199-214). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.