Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2021.29.1.51

A Study on Key Issues of Vitalizing the Governance of Rural Area Development and Policy Improvement Plans: Focusing on the Case of Regions in Chungcheongnam-do with Privately Entrusted Intermediary Support Organizations for the Community building Established  

Ko, Kyoung-Ho (단국대학교 정책경영대학원)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture / v.29, no.1, 2021 , pp. 51-73 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is intended to derive the key issues on vitalization of the governance of rural area development for 6 cities and counties in Chungcheongnam-do where privately entrusted intermediary support organizations have been established and to present their improvement plans of policy. The findings of the study have shown the governance for the case regions is still being characterized with a very formal governance being dominated by the strong administrative initiative and expediency. What have been presented as the improvement plans of policy are as follows: First, core provisions of the ordinances must be strengthened to mandatory regulations, and some ways to check and supplement such as monitoring, policy forums by public-private partnership, etc. are required for the sake of the effective operation of the ordinances. Second, in relation to the bases of competence according to the roles of core governance players, it is necessary to overcome the limitations of job rotation system, align the administrative support systems, expand the functions of a policy committee based on public-private cooperation and operate it effectively in the case of administration, and to strengthen a footing of a civilian community and the perspectives of political incubation in administration and provide support projects contributing to the growth of the corporations in the case of the entrusted corporation, and to align the operating systems of the centers, review the introduction of a system with a full-time center head, continuously provide specialized education and improve the working environment in the case of the support centers.
Keywords
intermediary support organization; local governance; partnership; privately entrusted; rural area development;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Cha, M. S., H. S. Park, and Y. H. Jeong. 2003. Building a governance system for regional development in Korea. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
2 Community Business Center. Manuel for Intermediary Bodies for Community Business. Ministry of Trade. Industry and Energy.Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology. 2011.
3 Howells, J. 2006. Intermediation and the Role of Intermediaries in Innovation, Research Policy. 35: 715-7288. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005.   DOI
4 Kellogg Foundation. 2002. Building Community Capacity: an Initial Inventory of Local Intermediary Organizations. Association for the Study and Development of Community.
5 Kim, Y., P. Y. Lee., R. N. Kim, and K. S. Jeong. 2008. A Study of Characteristics and Evaluation on Community Building Governance -The Case in Suncheon City-. Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association. 21(3): 87-108.
6 Lee, M. S. 2002. Conceptualizing Governance: Governance as Social Coordination. Korean Association of Governmental Studies. 36(4): 321-338.
7 Park, S. H., H. S. Chun, and S. J. Jeon. 2009. Participatory Governance Analysis in Community Planning: an Institutional Approach. Journal of Korea Planning Association. 44(3): 207-220.
8 Tae, Y. J. and S. H. Park. 2010. Characteristics of Maeul-mandeulgi in Korea based on the Content Analysis of Related Local Ordinances, 2000-2009. Architectural Research. 26(7): 175-182.
9 Kim, S. M. 2016. Residents' Autonomy and Collaborative Community-Building: From a Perspective of Collaborative Community Governance. korean local government review. 28(1): 181-209.   DOI
10 Kim, Y. Y. 2001. Theoretical Background and Development Direction of Regional Linkage Cooperation. Hanulbooks.
11 Kim, J. h. 2015. A Comparative Research on Citizen Participation Administration for Good Governance in Large Cities: Focusing on Supporting Policies for Community Building Projects in Busan and Seoul. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies. 18(4): 135-170.
12 Ko, K. H. and T. T. Kim. 2016. The Current Situation and Development Strategies of the Intermediary Agencies in the Private Sector -The Case of Industrial Councils in Chungnam Province-. Korea Academy Industrial Cooperation Society. 17(5): 294-304.
13 Lee, S. J. 2006. Governance and citizen participation. Journal of governance studies. 1(1): 64-82.
14 Park, S. H. 2015. A Study on the Operation Characteristics of the Intermediate Support Organization for Village Creation: From the perspective of government-civil society relations. Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association. 28(3): 75-104.
15 Seo, H. S. 2017. A Study on Governance Formation and Structural Change Focus on the Jinan county. Korean Journal of Local Government & Administration Studies. 31(3): 53-77.   DOI
16 Kim, Y. Y., M. S. Cha, and H. S. Kang. 2009. Regional Development Police. Hanulbooks.
17 Mok, J. H. and J. H. Park. 2008. A Comparative Case Study for Maul-mandulgi Practices: Focused on Kwangju Bukgu and Tokyo Setagayagu Cases. Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea Urban Design. 9(4): 19-38.
18 Kim, D. H. and S. G. Ha. 2013. Policy Effectiveness Analysis and Successful Implementation according to the Governance of Public-Private Partnerships, Nam-gu, Ulsan Promoting Analysis of Factors. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies. 17(3): 93-123.
19 Yeo, K. H. 2017. A Study on the Local Governance Formation for Steps of the Community Planning: Focused on the Jangsu Village, Seongbuk-gu. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies. 21(1): 395-422.   DOI
20 Yu, J. Y. 2016. Crisis of Governance and the Reconstruction of Democratic Governance in Maeul Community Building - A Look into the Community Stories of Samtaegi-Maeul and Sori-Maeul. The Graduate School Seoul National University paper of masters degree.
21 Kim, S. G. 2012. A Guideline for Construction on Community Building Governance Using Community Transitional Supportive Organization. Future Public Adminstration Review. 1(2): 63-79.