Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2013.21.2.271

The Effect of Continuous Use of Cow Manure on Productivity of Organic Rice and Feed Value, Stock Carrying Capacity of Organic Rice Straw in Central Region of Korea  

Park, Sang-Soo (일본 지바대학 원예학연구과)
Noh, Jin-Hwan (연세대학교 과학기술대학 생명과학기술학부)
Lee, Hee-Choong (연세대학교 과학기술대학 생명과학기술학부)
Kim, Yoon-Joong (연세대학교 과학기술대학 생명과학기술학부)
Lee, Ju-Sam (연세대학교 과학기술대학 생명과학기술학부)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture / v.21, no.2, 2013 , pp. 271-282 More about this Journal
Abstract
This experiments was conducted to investigate the influence on organic rice cultivation by continuous use of cow manure in the central region of Korea and investigated productivity of organic rice and feed value, stock carrying capacity of organic rice straw. In the results, application of chemical fertilizer showed higher one of 1st and 2nd year in fresh matter yield (15.77, 30.30ton/ha), dry matter yield (9.90, 13.89 ton/ha), dry matter yield of rice straw (4.88, 7.15ton/ha), dry matter weight of kernel per plant (29.81, 39.99g) and number of kernel per plant (1212.58, 1701units), but there were not significantly differences with each experimental plots in 3rd year. And harvest index showed higher one in application of chemical fertilizer (0.52, 0.48, 0.43) until 3 years. But their quantitative difference between application of chemical fertilizer and cow manure was gradually decreased each year. And the average value of $K_{CP}$ and $K_{TDN}$ showed higher one in application of chemical fertilizer (2.01, 2.94, 1.95 head/ha/yr) until 3 years. However, quantitative difference between chemical fertilizer and cow manure was gradually decreased each year. Especially, application of cow manure showed higher value of 3rd year in $K_{ME}$, but there was not significantly difference with each experimental plots. According to the results, continuous use of cow manure will be reduced their quantitative differences between chemical fertilizer as the year progress in the central region of Korea in terms of productivity of organic rice and feed value, stock carrying capacity of organic rice straw.
Keywords
rice; cow manure; productivity; feed value; stock carrying capacity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cho, H. S., K. W. Chang, C. G. Kim, J. H. Seo, and S. J. Kim. 2002. Marginal application time of pig manure before rice transplanting in paddy field. J. of KOWREC. 10(2): 59-64.
2 Anon. 1973. Rondup(R) herbicids formulation of isopropylamine salt of glyphosate (Nphosphonomethglycine). Postmergence herbicide. Monsanto Agric. Div., St, Louis. Missouri. Tech. Bull. Mon0573-2-73.
3 A.O.A.C. 1990. Official methods of analysis (15th Ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington D.C.
4 Briggle, L. W. 1959. Growing Rye. USDA Farmers' Bull. No. 2146.
5 Dilz, K., K. J. Postmus, and W. H. Prins. 1990. Residual effect of long term applications of farmyard manure to silage maize. Fertilizer Research. 26:249-252.   DOI
6 Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soet. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. USDA Agric. handbook No. 379, Washington, D.C.
7 Holland. C., W. P. Kezar, E. J. Lazowski, W. C. Mahanna, and R. Reinhart. 1990. Pioneer forage manual : A Nutritional Guide, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. pp. 1-55.
8 Kim, J. H. and B. H. Lee. 2004. Current situation of rice industry and prospect for structural change. KREI. pp. 1-3.
9 Jo, I. H. 2006. The effect of application of cattle slurry on dry matter yield and feed values of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) in uncultivated rice paddy. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 14(1): 69-83.
10 Joop, H. A. and M Steenvoorden. 1989. Dairy manure management. Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service. Ithaca, New York 14853. NRAES-31.
11 Lee, J. S. 2009. Studies on roughage production and their use enlargement. Korean Institute of Livestock Administration.
12 Lee, S. M., I. S. Ryu, C. S. Lee, Y. H. Park, and M. H. Um. 1999. Determination of application rate of composted pig manure for wetland rice. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 32(2): 182-191.
13 Linn, J. and N. Martin. 1989. Forage quality tests and interpretation. Univ. of Minnesota Ext. Serv. AG-FO-2637.
14 Loomis, R. S. and D. J. Connor. 1998. Crop ecology. p. 28.
15 Lund, Z. F. and B. D. Doss. 1980. Residual effect of dairy cattle manure on plant growth and soil properties. Agronomy Journal. 72: 123-130.   DOI
16 MAF (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry). 2006. Standard model development of naturecirculating organic agriculture.
17 MAFR(Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs). 2012. Agricultural statistics
18 Martin, J. H., W. H. Leonard, and D. L. Stamp. 1976. Principle of field crop production. Collier MacMillan Pub. London. Third ed.
19 Meng, W. J., I. Choi, D. J. Kim, J. I. Kim, Y. D. Goh, M. B. Chang, K. H. Nahm, E. Lee, and S. Y. Jeong. 2005. Feed resources, Hyangmoon Pub. Co.
20 NIAS (National Institute of Animal Science). 2007. Korean feeding standard (Cattle).
21 SAS. 2002. Statistical Analysis System ver. 9.2. SAS Institute INC., Cary, NC. USA.
22 Park, S. S. 2012. The cropping system establishment for organic roughage production and the nitrogen cycling in organic crop-livestock system. Master thesis, Yonsei University.
23 Park, W. K., Y. S. Song, H. J. Jun, K. S. Jung, and K. S. Lee. 2008. Optimum application rate between livestock compost and chemical fertilizer for rice cultivation. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 41(0): 208-208.
24 RDA (Rural Development Administration). 2010. Chemical analysis method of soil
25 Seo, Y. H., A. S. Lee, B. O. Cho, A. S. Kang, B. C. Jeong, and Y. S. Jung. 2010. Adaptation study of rice cultivation in Gangwon province to climate change. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 12(2): 143-151.   DOI
26 Shim, K. M., G. Y. Kim, K. A. Roh, H. C. Jeong, and D. B. Lee. 2008. Evaluation of agro-climatic indices under climate change. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 10(4): 113-120.   DOI
27 Wolf, J. and H. Van Keulen. 1989. Modelling long-term crop response to fertilizer and soil nitrogen. II. Comparison with field result. Plant and soil. 120: 23-38.   DOI