Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5855/ENERGY.2020.29.3.001

Portfolio matrix analysis for the improvement of R&D productivity in the energy technology sector  

Park, Nyun-Bae (Korea Institute of Energy Research)
Kim, Kyung Taek (Korea Institute of Energy Research)
Park, Sangyong (Korea Institute of Energy Research)
Choi, Sang-jin (Korea Institute of Energy Research)
Hong, Jong-chul (Korea Institute of Energy Research)
Publication Information
Journal of Energy Engineering / v.29, no.3, 2020 , pp. 1-6 More about this Journal
Abstract
A portfolio matrix analysis was conducted to improve R&D productivity of the government-funded R&D projects in the energy sector. 27 projects (42 detailed technologies) in 2018 were evaluated on a 5-point scale in terms of availability and technology competitiveness, and portfolio matrix analysis was conducted twice. The results of the portfolio matrix analysis could provide the landscape of on-going R&D projects at a time and could be utilized as feedback data to establish development strategies for individual projects, while establishing differentiated management directions to improve R&D productivity in each of the four areas of the portfolio matrix.
Keywords
Energy Technology R&D; R&D Productivity; Portfolio Management; Portfolio Matrix;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bae, Y. H., et al., 2008, Establishment of investment direction for national R&D projects through portfolio analysis, Science & Technology Policy, Vol. 168, pp. 94-109 (in Korean)
2 Cho, G. T., et al., 2011, R&D management, Gyeongmunsa, pp. 126-133 (in Korean)
3 Cooper, R. G., 2016, Winning at new products, Jinsung Books Co., pp. 411-435 (in Korean)
4 Cooper, R., et al., 2001, Portfolio management for new product development: results of an industry practices study, R&D Management, Vol. 31, No. 4.
5 Dayton, L., 2020, How South Korea made itself a global innovation leader, Nature, Vol. 581, pp. S54-S56   DOI
6 Han, B. J., 2014, Planning for solving problems, Chologbi, pp. 293-297 (in Korean)
7 IEA, 2020, Energy Technology Perspectives 2020
8 KIER, 2019, KIER's main projects management handbook for researchers (in Korean)
9 Kim, Y. J., et al., 2009, A study on the investment strategy of the IT R&D using portfolio analysis and AHP method, Korean Management Science Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 37-51 (in Korean)
10 Lee, C. W., 2009, R&D portfolio management techniques, Technology and Management, pp. 46-49 (in Korean)
11 Lee, K. C., et al., 2009, Application of TPM methodology for evaluation GIS R&D project, The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 152-161 (in Korean)
12 Lee, S. M., 2018, R&D management system in LG Chem, Conference of performance presentation in the research administration advancement, pp. 193-199 (in Korean)
13 Park, H. W., et al., 2019, Technology strategy and R&D planning, Hansung University Press, pp. 188-205 (in Korean)
14 Park, J. H., 2005, Technology portfolio matrix in the global company, Spring Conference of The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society & Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, pp. 159-162 (in Korean)
15 Pfitzner M. S., et al., 2011, R&D porfolio management: The case study of a big energy company in Brazil, PICMET, pp. 1-16
16 Sim, J. Y., et al., 1998, Technology strategies based on portfolio analysis: ETRI case, Conference of Korea Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, pp. 1301-1304 (in Korean)
17 Kim, S. S., 2019, Achievements and challenges in the science and technology policy, Science and technology debate with the people, pp. 5-12 (in Korean)