Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5855/ENERGY.2017.26.4.045

Characteristic studies of coal power plants ash sample and monitoring of PM 2.5  

Thriveni., T (Hanil Cement)
Ramakrishna., CH (Hanil Cement)
Nam, Seong Young (Technical Center, HANIL CEMENT Co.Ltd.)
kim, Chunsik (Technical Center, HANIL CEMENT Co.Ltd.)
Ahn, Ji Whan (Mineral Processing Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM))
Publication Information
Abstract
Coal power plants produce electricity for the nation's power grid, but they also produce more hazardous air emissions than any other industrial pollution sources. The quantity is staggering, over 386,000 tons of 84 separate hazardous air pollutants spew from over 400 plants in 46 states. In South Korea also, annual coal ash generation from coal-fired power plants were about 6 million tons in 2015. Pollutants containing particulate matter 10, 2.5 (PM10, PM2.5), heavy metals and dioxins from coal-fired power plant. The emissions threaten the health of people who live near these power plants, as well as those who live hundreds of miles away. These pollutants that have long-term impacts on the environment because they accumulate in soil, water and animals. The present study is to investigate the physical and chemical characteristics of coal-fired power plant fly ash and bottom ash contains particulate matter, whose particulate sizes are lower than $PM_{10}$ and $PM_{2.5}$ and heavy metals. There are wide commercial technologies were available for monitoring the PM 2.5 and ultra-fine particles, among those carbonation technology is a good tool for stabilizing the alkaline waste materials. We collected the coal ash samples from different coal power plants and the chemical composition of coal fly ash was characterized by XRF. In the present laboratory research approach reveals that potential application of carbonation technology for particulate matter $PM_{10}$, $PM_{2.5}$ and stabilization of heavy metals. The significance of this emerging carbonation technology was improving the chemical and physical properties of fly ash and bottom ash samples can facilitate wide re use in construction applications.
Keywords
coal ash; particulate matter; heavy metals; carbonation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). 2011. Toxic Substances Portal: Toxicological Profiles. Washington, DC, USA: ATSDR. Web Link:http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/index.asp [Accessed: 3 February 2011].
2 Bayerisches Landesamtfur Umweltschutz, 2000. Grundsatzuntersuchunguber die KorngroXenverteilung im Abgas verschiedener Emittenten, Project I and II. /http://www.bayern.de/lfu/luft/veroeffentlich/umweltforsch/umweltforsch.htmS (last accessed 16/02/07).
3 Dreiseidler, A., Straub, D., Baumbach, G., 2001. Korngro Xenverteilung (PM10 und PM2.5) von Staubemissionen relevanter stationarer Quellen. UBA-Forschungsbericht 298 44 280, Berlin.
4 Landesamtesfur Umweltschutz Sachsen-Anhalt, 2001. Feinstaubemissionsuntersu chungen in Sachsen-Anhalt: PM10_PM2.5_ und PM1.0_ Emissionen aus Industrie und Hausbrand, Sonderheft 1. /http://www.mu.sachsen-anhalt.de/start/fachbereich03/fachberichte/main.htmS (last accessed 16/02/07).
5 Nisulescu gheorghe catalin, Ioana ionel, Delia calinoiu, Ion vetres, Air pollution monitoring in a town nearly power plant, Advances in Biology, Bioengineering and Environment, 2011, 181-184.
6 Liu F, High-resolution inventory of technologies, activities, and emissions of coal-fired power plants in China from 1990 to 2010. Atmos Chem Phys 15(23), 2015, 13299-13317.   DOI
7 J.W. Moore and E.A. Moore, Environmental chemistry, New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press; 1976, 500.
8 US EPA, Air quality for particulate matter, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC, Report No: EPA/600/p-95/001CF; 1996.
9 Shamzani Affendy Mohd Din, Nik Nurul-Hidayah Nik Yahya, Alias Abdullah, Fine Particulates Matter (PM2.5) from Coal-Fired Power Plant in Manjung and its Health Impacts, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 85, 2013, 92-99.   DOI
10 P. Padmavathi, Jyotsna Cherukuri, M. Anji Reddy, Ambient air pollutant levels in the vicinity of NTTPS thermal power plant, IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology, 9, 2015, 56-60.
11 Csavina, J., Field, J., Taylor, M. P., Gao, S., Landazuri, A., Betterton, E. A., & Saez, A. E. A review on the importance of metals and metalloids in atmospheric dust and aerosol from mining operations. Science of the Total Environment, 433, 2012, 58-73.   DOI
12 Sadovska. V, Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals Adsorbed in Particulates, International Journal of Environmental, Chemical, Ecological, Geological and Geophysical Engineering, 6, 2012, 481-484.
13 Genon K. Jensen, The unpaid health bill, How coal power plants make us sick, Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL) report, 2013, 1-46.
14 Karen L. Lancour, Green generations, problems resulting from human impact, 2014, 1-20.
15 Frank J. Kelly. Julia C. Fussell, Air pollution and public health: emerging hazards and improved understanding of risk, Environ Geochem Health, 37, 2015, 631-649.   DOI
16 Baumbach, G., Zuberbuhler, U., Struschka, M., Straub, D., Hein, K.R.G., (1999). Feinstaubuntersuchungen an Holzfeuerungen; Teil 1: Bereich Hausbrand und Kleingewerbe. Institut fur Verfahrenstechnik und Dampfkesselwesen, Report No. 44-1999, Universtat Stuttgart. Juli 1999.
17 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2007. National Emission Inventory (NEI) 2002: Inventory Data: Point Sector Data - ALLNEI HAP Annual 01232008. Web Link: inventory data [Accessed 11 January 2011].
18 International Energy Agency clean coal center report, Emission standards and control of $PM_{2.5}$ from coal fired power plants, 37, 2016.
19 C. Ehrlicha, G. Nolla, W.D. Kalkoffa, G. Baumbachb, A. Dreiseidler, PM10, PM2.5 and PM1.0 Emissions from industrial plants - Results from measurement programmes in Germany, Atmospheric Environment 41, 2007, 6236-6254.   DOI