Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5855/ENERGY.2017.26.2.044

Development of Event-based Safety Culture Weakness Evaluation methodology in NPPs  

Kim, Younggab (KHNP Central Research Institute)
Hur, Namyoung (KHNP Central Research Institute)
Park, Jeongjin (KHNP Central Research Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of Energy Engineering / v.26, no.2, 2017 , pp. 50-63 More about this Journal
Abstract
Safety culture degradation signs in nuclear power plants with complex and diverse systems can lead to their equipments performance deterioration. If these signs are neglected, they become potential causes of accidents. Therefore, it is necessary to monitor safety culture in the point of view of organization and management as well as to evaluate safety performance of nuclear power plants. Therefore, This paper suggested a methodology to evaluate safety culture weakness contributing the accidents' root causes in the case accidents occur at nuclear power plants. After reviewing methodologies using at domestic and international industry, the methodology suitable for domestic nuclear power plants was determined.
Keywords
safety culture; evaluation methodology; safety culture weakness; safety culture model;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 IAEA, 2016, OSART Independent Safety Culture Assessment(ISCA) Guidelines, IAEA Services Series 32, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
2 IAEA, 2013, REGULATORY OVERSIGHT OF SAFETY CULTURE IN NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS, IAEA-TECDOC-1707, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
3 U.S. NRC, 2006, Reactor Oversight Process, NUREG-1649, Rev.4, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
4 INPO, 2009. Principles for a Strong Nuclear Safety Culture, The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, USA.
5 INPO, 2009. Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment Process Manual: Overview of the NSCA Survey Process Tab C1 Rev.0, The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, USA.
6 KINS, 2016, Development of Regulatory Infrastructure for the Oversight of Safety Culture, KINS/RR-1134 Vol.6.
7 Patrick Hudson, 1999, Safety Culture-Theory and Practice, RTO HFM workshop on"The Human Factor in System Reliability - Is Human Performance Predictable?", Siena.
8 Shappell, S.A., et al., 2000, The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System-HFACS, DOT/ FAA/AM-00/7, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration.
9 Berg H.P., et al., 2001, SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND EVENT-BASED SAFETY CULTURE ASSESSMENT, Berg H.P., Ernst B.
10 U.S. NRC, 2014, ASPECTS WITHIN THE CROSSCUTTING AREAS, MANUAL CHAPTER 0310, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
11 U.S. NRC, 2014, Safety Culture Common Language, NUREG-2165, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
12 INPO, 2015, Leadership and Team Effectiveness Attributes, INPO 15-005, The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, USA.
13 WANO, 2016, WANO Event Report, WER ATL 16-0150, World Association of Nuclear Operators.
14 WANO, 2016, WANO Event Report, WER ATL 16-0226, World Association of Nuclear Operators.
15 WANO, 2016, WANO Event Report, WER ATL 16-0349, World Association of Nuclear Operators.
16 WANO, 2016, WANO Event Report, WER ATL 16-0552, World Association of Nuclear Operators.
17 KHNP, 2015, Development of Definition, Attribute and Consumer-Driven Contents of KHNP Nuclear Safety Culture, Technical Report.
18 Thomas L. Saaty., et al., 2008, Group Decision Making: Drawing out and Reconciling Differences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, RWS Publications, ISBN 978-1-888603-08-8.
19 INPO, 2013, Traits of a Healthy Nuclear Safety Culture, INPO 12-012, The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, USA.
20 U.S. NRC, 2011, NRC Inspection Manual, Inspection Procedure 95001, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.