1 |
Digieco Report. Tap On The Door of Mobile First World: Nielsen Koreanclick Mobile Behavioral Data, 2015. https://www.kdi.re.kr/infor/kresearch_view.jsp?ac=127673 (14 January 2015).
|
2 |
The Wall Street Journal. Korea's smartphone population tops milestone, 2014. http://blogs.wsj.com/korearealtime/2014/07/28/koreas-smartphone-population-tops-milestone (28, July. 2014).
|
3 |
Conlon EG, Lovegrove WJ, Chekaluk E, Pattison PE. Measuring visual discomfort. Vis Cogn. 1999;6(6):637-663.
DOI
|
4 |
Tyrrell RA, Leibowitz HW. The relationship of vergence effort to reports of visual fatigue following prolonged near work. Hum Factors. 1990;32(3):341-357.
|
5 |
Sheedy JE, Hayes JN, Engle J. Is all asthenopia the same? Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80(11):732-739.
DOI
|
6 |
Park KY, Bak KJ, Lee JG, Lee YS, Roh JH. Factors affecting the complaints of subjective symptoms in VDT operators. J Korea Occup Med. 1997;9(1):156-169.
|
7 |
Koh KH. Clinical performance analysis of lenses for accommodative function improvement. MA Thesis. Eulji University, Daejeon. 2008.
|
8 |
Gwiazda JE, Hyman L, Norton TT, Hussein M, Marsh-Tootle W, Marny R et al. Accommodation and related risk factors associated with myopia progression and their interaction with treatment in COMET children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(7):2143-2151.
DOI
|
9 |
Aller TA, Wildsoet CF. Bifocal soft contact lenses as a possible myopia control treatment: a case report involving identical twins. Clin Exp Optom. 2008;91(4):394-349.
DOI
|
10 |
Rosen R, Jaeken B, Lindskoog PA, Artal P, Unsbo P, Lundstrm L. Evaluating the peripheral optical effect of multifocal contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012;32(6):527-534.
DOI
|
11 |
Hasebe S, Nakatsuka C, Hamasaki I, Ohtsuki H. Downward deviation of progressive addition lenses in a myopia control trial. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005;25(4):310-314.
DOI
|
12 |
Westin E, Wick B, Harrist RB. Factors influencing success of monovision contact lens fitting: survey of contact lens diplomates. Optometry. 2000;71(12):757-763.
|
13 |
Loewenfeld IE. The Pupil: Anatomy, Physiology, and Clinical Applications, Vol 1. Woburn: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993:295-317.
|
14 |
Bennett ES, Weissman BA. Clinical contact lens practice, 1st Ed. Philadelphia: Lipppincott Williams & wilkins, 2004;544-547.
|
15 |
Anderson H, Hentz G, Glasser A, Stuebing K, Manny R. Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude decreases sigmoidally with age: A study of objectively measured accommodative amplitudes from age 3. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(7)2919-2926.
DOI
|
16 |
Rosenfield M, Carrel MF. Effect of near-vision addition lenses on the accuracy of the accommodative response. Optometry. 2001;72(1):19-24.
|
17 |
Tarrant J, Severson H, Wildsoet CF. Accommodation in emmetropic and myopic young adults wearing bifocal soft contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008;28(1):62-72.
DOI
|
18 |
Montes Mico R, Madrid Costa D, Radhakrishnan H, Charman WN, Ferrer BT. Accommodative functions with multifocal contact lenses: A pilot study. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88(8):998-1004.
DOI
|
19 |
Alpern M, Larson BF. Vergence and accommodation, IV. Effect of luminance quantity on the AC/A. Am J Opthalmol. 1960;49(5):1140-1149.
|
20 |
Mah KC. Binocular test, 2nd Ed. Daihaksurim. 2007;77-79.
|
21 |
Ko BU, Ryu WY, Park WC. Pupil size in the normal Korean population according to age and illuminance. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2011;52(4):401-406.
DOI
|
22 |
Han GA, Hwang JH, Mah KC. Objective measurement of accommodative responses with open-field autorefractor. Korean J Vis Sci. 2009;11(1):35-44.
|
23 |
Schor C, Landsman L, Erickson P. Ocular dominance and the interocular suppression of blur in monovision. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1987;64(10):723-730.
DOI
|
24 |
Gupta N, Naroo SA, Wolffsohn JS. Visual comparison of multifocal contact lens to monovision. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(2):98-105.
DOI
|
25 |
Rajagopalan AS, Bennett ES, Lakshminarayanan V. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83(8):611-615.
DOI
|
26 |
Pettersson AL, Ramsay MW, Lundstrom L, Rosen R, Nilsson M, Unsbo P et al. Accommodation in young adults wearing aspherical multifocal soft contact lens. J Modern Optics. 2011;58(19-20):1804-1808.
DOI
|
27 |
Madrid-Costa D, Ruiz-Alcocer J, Radhakrishnan H, Ferrer-Blasco T, Montes-Mico R. Changes in accommodative response with multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88(11):1309-1316.
DOI
|
28 |
Zellers J, Alpert T, Rouse M. A review of the literature and a normative study of accommodative facility. J Am Optom Assoc. 1984;55(1):31-37.
|
29 |
Gracia A, Cacho P, Lara F. Evaluating relative accommodations in general binocular dysfunctions. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79(12):779-787.
DOI
|
30 |
Plainis S, Atchison DA, Charman WN. Power profiles of multifocal contact lenes and their interpretation. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(10):1066-1077.
DOI
|
31 |
Montes-Mic R, Ali, JL. Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(4):703-711.
DOI
|