1 |
Garrett Q, Laycock B, Garrett RW. Hydrogel lens monomer constituents modulate protein sorption. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41(7):1687-1695.
|
2 |
Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, May C, Forbes I, Glasier M. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res. 2004;28(1):25-36.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Richard NR, Anderson JA, Tasevska ZG, Binder PS. Evaluation of tear protein deposits on contact lenses from patients with and without giant papillary conjunctivitis. 1992;18(3):143-147.
|
4 |
Li L, Wang JH, Xin Z. Synthesis and biocompatibility of a novel silicone hydrogel containing phosphorylcholine. European Polymer Journal. 2011;47(9):1795-1803.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Ju EH, Sung AY, Oh SJ, Lee KJ. The effect of protein deposit on the water content, oxygen transmissibility and contact angle of the soft contact lens. Korean J Vis Sci. 2010;12(4):291-302.
|
6 |
Jones L, Mann A, Evans K, Franklin V, Tighe B. An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77(10):503-510.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Luensmann D, Jones L. Protein deposition on contact lenses: the past, the present, and the future. Contact lens & Anterior eye. 2012;35(2):53-64.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Luensmann D, Jones L. Albumin adsorption to contact lens materials: a review. Contact lens & Anterior eye. 2008;31(4):179-187.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Lord MS, Stenzel MH, Simmons A, Milthorpe BK. The effect of charged groups on protein interaction with poly(HEMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2006;27(4):567- 575.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Karlgard CCS, Sarkar DK, Jones LW, Moresoli C, Leung KT. Drying methods for XPS analysis of purevision, focus Night&Day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. App Sur Sci. 2004;230(1-4):106-114.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Pedley DG, Skelly PJ, Tighe BJ. Hydrogels in biomedical applications. Br Polymer J. 1980;12(3):99-110.
|
12 |
Jones L, Dumbleton K. Silicone hydrogel contact lenses: part 1 evolution and current status. Optometry Today. 2002; 42(1):26-31.
|
13 |
Phillips AJ, Speedwell L. Contact lenses, 5th Ed. New York: Butterworth-Heinemann. 2006;63-77.
|
14 |
Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res. 2006;31(10):787- 796.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Park MJ, Kwon MJ, Hyun SH, Kim DS. The adsorption pattern of protein to the soft contact lens and its effect on the visible light transmission and the contact angle. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2004;9(1):53-68.
|
16 |
Choi JY, Park JS, Kim SR, Park MJ. The change in refractive powers of soft contact lenses causedby the deposition of tear proteins. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2011; 16(4):383-390.
|
17 |
Park MJ, Cho GT, Shin SH, Lee HS, Kim DS. The diameter and base curve changes of soft contact lens by protein deposition. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2005;10(3):165-171.
|
18 |
Subbaraman LN. Protein deposition and bacterial adhesion to conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. PhD Thesis. Waterloo University, Canada. 2009; 39-45.
|
19 |
Green-Church KB, Nichols KK, Kleinholz NM, Zhang L, Nichols JJ. Investigation of the human tear film proteome using multiple proteomic approaches. Mol Vis. 2008; 14(1):456-470.
|
20 |
Keith D, Hong B, Christensen M. A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. Curr Eye Res. 1997;16(5): 503-510.
DOI
ScienceOn
|