Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2013.18.2.165

Changes in KVA Resulting from Correction Condition of Refractive Error  

Shim, Hyun-Suk (Dept. of Ophthalmic Optics, Gwangju Health College)
Kim, Sang-Hyun (Dept. of Ophthalmic Optics, Gwangju Health College)
Kang, Hye-Sook (Dept. of Ophthalmic Optics, Gwangju Health College)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society / v.18, no.2, 2013 , pp. 165-171 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study are to analyze and to compare between pupillary size, reaction time, refractive error, corrected vision, dominant eye, static visual angle (SVA) and kinetic visual acuity (KVA) of male and female college students, to measure KVA of them in full correction and to identify changes of KVA by +0.50 D and -0.50 D spherical power addition respectively in full correction condition. Methods: KVA, SVA, pupillary size, reaction time, refractive error, corrected vision and dominant eye of 40 male and 40 female optical science students were measured by utilizing KOWA AS-4A, reaction time measurement program, subjective refractometer, and objective refractometer, and KVAs were measured when +0.50 D/-0.50 D were added in both eyes respectively. Results: Binocular KVA of whole subjects was $0.45{\pm}0.22$, and in monocular KVAs were $0.36{\pm}0.19$ for right eye and $0.34{\pm}0.19$ for left eye, and binocular KVA was significantly higher than monocular KVA. It appeared that the better SVA was, the better KVA was in significant way, and in terms of refractive error the less myopia amount was, the better KVA was, but it was not significant statistically. The lower astigmatism was, the slightly and significantly higher KVA was when dividing between equal or less than -1.00 D astigmatism group and over -1.00 D astigmatism group. In resulting from correction condition of refractive error KVAs were $0.45{\pm}0.22$ for full correction, $0.26{\pm}0.15$ for +0.50 D addition, $0.48{\pm}0.22$ for -0.50 D addition which indicates that KVA in over myopia correction was significantly the highest and followed by full correction and under correction. Similar findings were revealed in both male and female, and KVA of male was better than female in comparing between male and female. There was no significantly different KVA between dominant eye and non-dominant eye. Conclusions: Accordingly, it is concluded that KVA is related with far distance SVA, astigmatism amount, and refractive error amount except a dominant eye. Through this research, it was found that prescription for enhancing KVA is to make full correction or to overcorrect slightly myopia.
Keywords
Kinetic visual acuity; Static visual angle; Refractive error; Under correction; Over correction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Yoshimitsu K, Hiroshi Y. Training effects of visual function on college baseball players. Human performance measurement 2004;1(1):15-23.
2 Won CH, Mah KC. Sport vision training, 1st Ed. Seoul: Daehakselim, 1993;23-24.
3 Junko U, Shingo N, Midori S, Yoshiki Y. Visual function of the junior soccer athletes. Human performance measurement. 2007;4(1):17-24.
4 Yoshimitsu K, Hiroshi Y, Keishoku S, Kazuhiro H, Kazuhiro A. Kinetic visual acuity and reaction time in male college students. Human performance measurement 2007;4(1):25-30.
5 Hiromi M, Kenji Y, Takeshi Y, Tokio T. The characteristics of kinetic vision in women's table tennis players. Doshisha J Health and Sports Sci. 2010;2(1):26-37.
6 Yoshimitsu K, Hiroshi Y, Keishoku S, Kazuhiro A, Ryoko T. Development and gender differences in dynamic and kinetic visual acuities in children from 8 to 17 years of age. International J Sport and Health Sci. 2008;6(1):128-134.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Ishigaki H, Miyao M. Differences in dynamic visual acuity between athletes and nonathletes. Perceptual and Motor skills. 1993;77(3pt1):835-839.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Rouse MW, DeLand P, Christian R, Hawley J. A comparison study of dynamic visual acuity between athletes and nonathletes. J Am Optom Assoc. 1988;59(12):946-950.
9 Lee MA, Kim YG, Jung JH. Differences of dynamic visual acuity according to optical lens color. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2011;16(1):7-11.
10 Kim HR, Shin DM, Kim SH, Jeong HY, Kim YG, Jeong JH. A study DVA changes on free-form progressive lens and single vision lens. 2013 Diops optometry conference. 2013;2:87.
11 Yi MH, Sin JH. A study on the measurement of dynamic visual acuity for visual acuity chart size. Korean J Vis Sci. 2005;7(1):129-133.
12 Lee DH, Kim HD. Optical design of on inspection apparatus for dynamic visual acuity. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2004;9(2):473-480.
13 Shim MS, Kim SH, Kang HS, Shim HS. The study of kinetic visual acuity in college students. Korean J Vis Sci. 2012;17(4):419-424.
14 Kakiyama T, Kushima A, Hirota A. Effects of the correction of visual acuity on kinetic visual acuity (KVA) in high school rugby players. Japanese J Physical Fitness and Sports Med. 2004;53(2):255-262.
15 Ahn BC. Dynamic and kinetic visual acuity of athletes and nonathletes. J Korean Sports Med. 1998;16(2):238- 244.
16 Mochizuki S, Edagawa H, Hasuike M, A study of kinetic visual acuity and refraction in athletes. J Japanese Orthopt. 1998;26(1):25-30.