Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2017.36.2.69

Ergonomic Evaluation and Improvement of Bus Seat Armrest Design  

Jung, Hayoung (POSTECH, Department of Industrial and Management Engineering)
Lee, Seunghoon (POSTECH, Department of Industrial and Management Engineering)
Kim, Moonjin (Hyundai Motor Group, Division of Bus Body Engineering Team)
Choi, Hoimin (Hyundai Motor Group, Division of Bus Body Engineering Team)
You, Heecheon (POSTECH, Department of Industrial and Management Engineering)
Publication Information
Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea / v.36, no.2, 2017 , pp. 69-86 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The present study is intended to develop an improved bus seat armrest design by evaluating various bus armrest designs from ergonomic aspects. Background: An ergonomic armrest design which considers the sitting postures and body shapes of passengers can improve the convenience and comfort of a bus seat. Method: Subjective satisfaction of each of five design dimensions (length, width, height from seatpan, shape, and angle) was evaluated for seven bus seat armrest designs in various sizes and shapes by 58 participants (28 males and 33 females) using a 7-point scale (1: very dissatisfied, 4: neutral, and 7: very satisfied). Improved bus seat armrest designs adjustable in length and rotatable to the left or right (sliding and rotating armrest, SRA) with a concave, flat, or convex shape of the upper part were developed by considering the preferred design features and the body size and shape in sitting posture and needs of passengers and then compared with a conventional armrest. Results: A bus seat armrest with a wide width (40~50mm), a long length (360mm), a lower height (213mm), and a curved shape was found significantly preferred in terms of comfort. The proposed armrest designs (SRA-convex, SRA-flat, and SRA-concave) improved satisfaction by 46~62% for length suitability, 184~216% for width suitability, 205~214% for angle suitability, 138~181% for contact area suitability, and 49~64% for height suitability, 138~174% for comfort, and 93~111% for overall satisfaction. Conclusion: The preferred design features and passengers' needs of bus seat armrest were identified and the SRA designs were recommended for better usability. Application: The ergonomic design process of bus seat armrest employed in the present study can be applied to designing armrests in various vehicles for better convenience and comfort.
Keywords
Ergonomic armrest design; Human body shape; Shape analysis; Product development; Armrest size and location;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bush, T.R. and Hubbard, R.P., Support force measures of midsized men in seated positions. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 129(1), 58-65, 2007.   DOI
2 Delisle, A., Lariviere, C., Plamondon, A. and Imbeau, D., Comparison of three computer office workstations offering forearm support: impact on upper limb posture and muscle activation, Ergonomics, 49(2), 139-160, 2006.   DOI
3 Fredericks, T.K., Butt, S.E., Kumar, A.R., Amin, S.G., Utkan, F. and Belingar, T., Influence of armrest width and task on armrest usage, In Proceedings of IIE Annual Conference and Expo 2014, 2326-2335, 2014.
4 Groenesteijin, L., Ellegast, R.P., Keller, K., Krause, F., Berger, H. and de Loose, M.P., Office task effects on comfort and body dynamics in five dynamic office chairs, Applied Ergonomics, 43(2), 320-328, 2012.   DOI
5 Harih, G. and Dolsak, B., Comparison of subjective comfort ratings between anatomically shaped and cylindrical handles, Applied Ergonomics, 45(4), 943-954, 2014.   DOI
6 Hasegawa, T. and Kumashiro, M., Effects of Armrests on Workload with Ten-key Operation, Applied Human Science: Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 17(4), 123-129, 1998.   DOI
7 Kim, J., Na, H., Cho, D., Shin, Y., Park, S. and Kim, J., Development of questionnaire for automobile seat comfort evaluation, Korean Journal of the Science of Emotion and Sensibility, 13(2), 381-390, 2010.
8 Kim, M., Choi, Y. and You, H., The arm rest of a seat. Patent Application Number: 10-2014-0152184, 2014.
9 Kolich, M., Automobile seat comfort: occupant preferences vs. anthropometric accommodation, Applied Ergonomics, 34, 177-184, 2003.   DOI
10 Korean Agency for Technology and Standards (KATS), 2010. The Report on the 6th Size Korea (Korean Body Measurement and Investigation), Seoul, Korea: Size Korea, Ministry of Knowledge Economy
11 Kuijt-Evers, L.F.M., Vink, P. and de Looze, M.P., Comfort predictors for different kinds of hand tools: Differences and Similarities, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37, 73-84, 2007.   DOI
12 Nag, P.K., Pal, S., Kotadiya, S.M. and Gosai, N.K., Human-seat interface analysis of upper and lower body weight distribution, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(5-6), 539-545, 2008.   DOI
13 Lee, W., Jeong, J., Park, J., Jeon, E., Kim, H., Jung, D., Park, S. and You, H., Analysis of the facial measurements of Korean Air Force pilot for oxygen mask design, Ergonomics, 56, 1451-1464, 2013.   DOI
14 Mahmoudi, N. and Bazrafshan, M., A Carpet-Weaver's Chair Based on Anthropometric Data, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 19(4), 543-550, 2013.   DOI
15 McCormick, D.A. and Tubergen, R.G., System to Monitor Task Chair Seating, Clinical Biomechanics, 18(10), 981-984, 2003.   DOI
16 Nag, P.K., Vyas, H., Nag, A. and Pal, S., Postural Stability of Sitting Women, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 19(4), 583-595, 2013.   DOI
17 Park, J., Lee, H., Choi, Y., Park, K., Kim, M. and You, H., Development of an Evaluation Protocol for a Bus Seat. Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 41(1), 74-78, 2015.   DOI
18 Smith, D.R., Andrews, D.M. and Wawrow, P.T., Development and evaluation of the Automotive Seating Discomfort Questionnaire (ASDQ), International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36, 141-149, 2006.   DOI
19 Son, H., Jeong, B. and Sin, M., Safety Armrest Bar for Skid Steer Loader, Patent Registered Number: 30-2014-0044239, 2015.
20 Van Veen, S.A.T., Van Mastrigt, S.H., Kamp, I. and Vink, P., Improving car passengers' comfort and experience by supporting the use of handheld devices, Work, 49(2), 215-223, 2014.
21 Vos, G.A., Congleton, J.J., Moore, J.S., Amendola, A.A. and Ringer, L., Postural versus chair design impacts upon interface pressure, Applied Ergonomics, 37(5), 619-628, 2006.   DOI
22 Zhao, J. and Tang, L., An evaluation of comfort of a bus seat, Applied Ergonomics, 25(6), 386-392, 1994.   DOI