Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2014.33.4.255

Evaluation of the Functional and Non-functional Seat Sponge Effect in Sitting Chairs  

Min, Seung Nam (Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science/Center for Medical Metrology, Division of Convergence Technology)
Park, Se Jin (Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science/Division of Convergence Technology)
Subramaniyam, Murali (Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science/Center for Medical Metrology, Division of Convergence Technology)
Lee, Heeran (Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science/Division of Convergence Technology)
Publication Information
Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea / v.33, no.4, 2014 , pp. 255-265 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate comfort levels of functional and non-functional chairs using subjective comfort rating, interface pressure measurement, muscle activity measurement, and skin temperature measurement. Background: Chairs are used for a prolonged period of time for sitting in many places such as the office, at university, at school, in industry, and so on. Almost all people use chairs in their everyday life. The functional properties of the chair are associated with comfort. Method: The subjective evaluation contains questions regarding chair comfort which can be rated with five point scale. The body-seat interface pressure was measured using a pressure mat system. The symmetry of sitting was measured using electromyography. The change in body part (thigh and buttock) temperature before and after sitting on a chair was measured with an infrared camera. Results: Participants rated significantly (p < 0.05) higher comfort scores for the functional chair in relation to the buttock and thigh region. Also, the participants felt a better cushion effect in the functional chair. When using the functional chair, lower interface pressure, better thermal comfort, and better symmetry of erector spinae muscle activity were observed. Conclusion: Overall, interface pressure measurement, muscle activity measurement, thermal imaging and subjective comfort score results showed that the functional chair was more comfortable than the non-functional chair. Application: The adopted methodologies could be used to measure the seating comfort of train seats.
Keywords
Chair comfort; Interface pressure; Thermal imaging; Electromyography;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 De Looze, M.P., Kuijt-Evers, L.F. and Van Dieen, J.A.A.P., Sitting comfort and discomfort and relationships with objective measures, Ergonomics, 46(10), 985-997, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Candas, V., To be or not to be comfortable: basis and prediction. Elsevier Ergonomics Book Series, 3, 207-215, 2005.   DOI
3 Beach, T.A., Parkinson, R.J., Stothart, J.P. and Callaghan, J.P., Effects of prolonged sitting on the passive flexion stiffness of the in vivo lumbar spine, The Spine Journal, 5(2), 145-154, 2005.   DOI
4 Brienza, D.M., Karg, P.E., Geyer, M.J., Kelsey, S. and Trefler, E., The relationship between pressure ulcer incidence and buttock-seat cushion interface pressure in at-risk elderly wheelchair users. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(4), 529-533, 2001.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Dunk, N.M. and Callaghan, J.P., Gender-based differences in postural responses to seated exposures. Clinical biomechanics, 20(10), 1101-1110, 2005.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Ebe, K. and Griffin, M.J., Factors affecting static seat cushion comfort, Ergonomics, 44(10), 901-921, 2001.   DOI
7 Ferguson, S.A. and Marras, W.S., Biomechanical principles for reducing low back pain, In: iSpine: evidence-based interventinal spine care. Demos Medical Publishing, 2011.
8 Fujimaki, G. and Mitsuya, R., Study of the seated posture for VDT, work, Displays, 23(1), 17-24, 2002.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Rohlmann, A., Wilke, H.J., Graichen, F. and Bergmann, G., Spinal load bearing during sitting in an office chair with a tilting back, Biomedical Engineering, 47, 91-96, 2002.   DOI
10 Thariq, M.G.M., Munasinghe, H.P. and Abeysekara, J.D., Designing chairs with mounted desktop for university students: Ergonomics and comfort, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40, 8-18, 2010.   DOI
11 Udo, H., Fujimura, M. and Yoshinaga, F., The effect of a tilting seat on back, lower back and legs during sitting work, Industrial health, 37(4), 369-381, 1999.   DOI
12 Kolich, M., Predicting automobile seat comfort using a neural network, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 33(4), 285-293, 2004.   DOI
13 Hsu, W.H. and Wang, M.J. Physical discomfort among visual display terminal users in a semiconductor manufacturing company: a study of prevalence and relation to psychosocial and physical/ergonomic factors, AIHA Journal, 64(2), 276-282, 2003.   DOI
14 Jones, B.F., A reappraisal of the use of infrared thermal image analysis in medicine, Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on, 17(6), 1019-1027, 1998.
15 Jung, E.S. and Choe, J., Human reach posture prediction based on psychophysical discomfort, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,18(2), 173-179, 1996.   DOI
16 Killen, G., Ancient Egyptian Furniture. Aris and Phillips, 1980.
17 Kim, S.K. and Kim, S.E., An effect analysis of women's Pelvic Correction board, Journey of Koran Society in Living Environment System, 20(5), 622-628, 2013.
18 Knave, B.G., Wibom, R.I., Voss, M., Hedstorm, L.D. and Bergqcist, U.O., Work with video display terminals among office employees: I. Subjective symptoms and discomfort, Scandinavian journal of work, environment and health, 11(6), 457-466, 1985.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Konrad, P., The abc of emg: A practical introduction to kinesiological electromyography, 1, 2005.
20 Kyung, G. and Nussbaum, M.A., Driver sitting comfort and discomfort (part II): Relationships with and prediction from interface pressure, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(5), 526-538, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Min, S.N., Kim, J.Y. and Parnianpour, M., The effects of safety handrails and the heights of scaffolds on the subjective and objective evaluation of postural stability and cardiovascular stress in novice and expert construction workers, Applied ergonomics, 43(3), 574-581, 2012.   DOI
22 Lan, L., Lian, Z., Liu, W. and Liu, Y. Investigation of gender difference in thermal comfort for Chinese people, European journal of applied physiology, 102(4), 471-480, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Lee, K.S., Waiker, A.M. and WU, L., Physical stress evaluation of microscope work using objective and subjective methods, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2, 203-309, 1988.   DOI
24 Michel, D.P. and Helander, M.G., Effects of two types of chairs on stature change and comfort for individuals with healthy and herniated discs, Ergonomics, 37(7), 1231-1244, 1994.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Oudenhuijzen, A., Tan, K. and Morsch, F., The relationship between seat pressure and comfort, SAE Technical Paper Series 2003-01-2213, 2003.
26 Park, J.H., Lee, I., Kim, M.U., Kim, S.H. and Jung, H., Body pressure distributions of the varying sitting postures in office work. Proceeding of ergonomics conference, Ergonomics Society of Korea, 2011.
27 Salewytsch, A.J. and Callaghan, J.P., Can quantified lumbar spine postures and trunk muscle activation levels predict discomfort during prolonged sitting?, Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the ACE, 1999.
28 Park, S.J., The evaluation of seating comfort by the objective measures, 1997.
29 Qin, T., Zhang, J.G. and Dai, Y.X., Research on Body Pressure Distribution at Different Angles of Wheelchair Seat Surface, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 477, 345-348, 2014.
30 Kamijo, K., Tujimura, H., Obara, H. and Katsumata, M., Evaluation of Seating Comfort, SAE Technical Paper Series 820761, 1982.
31 LeBlanc, J., Ducharme, M.B., Pasto, L. and Thompson, M., Response to thermal stress and personality, Physiology & behavior, 80(1), 69-74, 2003.   DOI