Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2014.33.2.125

Evaluation of Integral Seat Desk used in Universities based on KS/ISO Standard and Questionnaire Survey  

Kee, Dohyung (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Keimyung University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea / v.33, no.2, 2014 , pp. 125-134 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate integral seat desk used in universities through comparison of real dimension values of the desk with KS/ISO standard and questionnaire survey. Background: School furniture that helps students sit comfortably for longer periods of time and allows for better concentration on learning is important. However, seat and desk have been generally designed based on the industry practice rather than user's anthropometry, and seats and desks used in universities of Korea have not been ergonomically evaluated. Method: Real 13 dimensions of the desk used in K University were measured using tape measure and inclinometer, and the dimension values were compared to the KS standard of desk and chair for lecture room (KS G 4210) and ergonomic design principles found in relevant references. Subjective appropriacies and preference for the desk were investigated based on questionnaire survey, in which 121 (male: 91, female: 30) college students participated. Results: Several dimensions for the desk and chair investigated except desk depth and width, leg room width, seat width have not met the KS standard, but all dimensions satisfied ergonomic design principles available in references. The questionnaire survey revealed that appropriacies for desk surface size, seat pan depth, seat pan cushion and backrest curvature were under middle point of 3.0, and that those for the other dimensions showed higher scores exceeding 3.0. Conclusion: The integral seat desk widely used in universities showed some design problems in terms of standards of KS G 2010 and KS G 4210, and ergonomic design principles. Compared to the general desk with separated desk and seat, subjective preference on the integral seat desk was low. Application: This would be used as a valuable guideline when designing or choosing new integral seat desk with high satisfaction of students.
Keywords
Desk; Seat; Chair; Integral seat desk;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 KATS (Korean Agency for technology and Standard), Sizes and dimensions of fixed desk and chair for lecture rooms (KS G 4210), 2005.
2 Agha, S.R., School furniture match to students' anthropometry in the Gaza Strip, Ergonomics, 53, 344-354, 2010.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Fernandez, J.E. and Poonawala, M.F., How long should it take to evaluate seats subjectively? International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 22, 483-487, 1998.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Geldhof, E., De Clercq, D., De Bourdeaudhuij, I. and Cardon, G., Classroom postures of 8e12 year old children, Ergonomics, 50, 1571-1581, 2007.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Castellucci, H.I., Arezes, P.M. and Viviani, C.A., Mismatch between classroom furniture and anthropometric measures in Chilean schools, Applied Ergonomics, 41, 563-568, 2010.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Corlett, E.N., Background to sitting at work: research-based requirements for the design of work seats, Ergonomics, 49, 1538- 1546, 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Dianat, I., Karimi, M.A., Hashemi, A.A. and Bahrampour, S., Classroom furniture and anthropometric characteristics of Iranian high school students: Proposed dimensions based on anthropometric data, Applied Ergonomics, 44, 101-108, 2013.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Drury, C.G. and Coury, B.G., A methodology for chair evaluation, Applied Ergonomics, 13(3), 195-202, 1982.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Sanders, M.S. and McCormick, E.J., Human factors in engineering and design, 6th Ed., McGraw-Hill Inc., 1987.
10 Savanur, C.S., Altekar, C.R. and De, A., Lack of conformity between Indian classroom furniture and student dimensions: proposed future seat/table dimensions, Ergonomics, 50, 1612-1625, 2007.   DOI
11 Size Korea Home Page, http://sizekorea.kats.go.kr/ (retrieved January 10, 2014).
12 Kim, E.H. and Park, J.H., A survey on the students' discomfort to school desks and chairs, Proceedings of Fall Conference of Korea Society of Emotion and Sensibility, 2009.
13 Koskelo, R., Vuorikari, K. and Hänninen, O., Sitting and standing postures are corrected by adjustable furniture with lowered muscle tension in high-school students, Ergonomics, 50, 1643-1656, 2007.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 KATS (Korean Agency for technology and Standard), Furniture-Chairs and tables for educational institutions-Functional sizes (KS G 2010), 2011.
15 Kee, D., Lee, K.T., Park, J.H. and Choi, K.I., Ergonomics for industrial safety and health managers, 3rd ed., Hankyungsa, 2011.
16 Murphy, S., Buckle, P. and Stubbs, D., A cross-sectional study of self-reported back and neck pain among English schoolchildren and associated physical and psychological risk factors, Applied Ergonomics, 38, 797-804, 2007.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Niebel, B. and Freivalds, A., Methods standards & Work design, 10th ed., McGraw-Hill Inc., 1993.
18 Pheasant, S., Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Environments and the design of work, Taylor & Francis, 1995.
19 Trevelyan, F.C. and Legg, S.J., Risk factors associated with back pain in New Zealand school children, Ergonomics, 54, 257-262, 2011.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Troussier, B., Tesniere, C., Fauconnier, J., Grisons, J., Juvin, R. and Phelip, X., Comparative study of two different kinds of school furniture among children, Ergonomics, 42, 516-526, 1999.   DOI
21 Jeong, B.Y. and Park, K.S., Sex differences in anthropometry for school design, Ergonomics, 33(12), 1511-1521, 1990.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Milanese, S. and Grimmer, K., School furniture and the user population: an anthropometric perspective, Ergonomics, 47, 416-426, 2004.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Saarni, L., Nygård, C.H., Kaukiainen, A. and Rimpelä, A., Are the desks and chairs at school appropriate? Ergonomics, 50, 1561-1570, 2007.   DOI