Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2009.28.2.057

Developing User Interface Metaphors for Driver Information Systems  

Park, Yong-S. (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology)
Han, Sung-H. (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology)
Park, Won-Kyu (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology)
Cho, Young-Seok (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology)
Publication Information
Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea / v.28, no.2, 2009 , pp. 57-67 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study proposed a practical metaphor development process that consisted of three steps: 1) identifying major functions, 2) developing metaphor candidates, and 3) evaluating appropriateness of the candidates. In the first step, a total of 27 functions might be implemented in a driver information system (DIS) in the near future. Then, three metaphor candidates were selected from existing metaphors, which were reported to be more practical than others by previous studies. Finally, the candidates were evaluated on their appropriateness for driver information systems by using a quick and simple survey. As a result, two metaphors (a PC and a secretary) were identified as the most appropriate ones. The two metaphors can be used to design a variety of interfaces and interactions for driver information systems. In addition, the development process proposed in this study could be applied to developing metaphors for emerging devices with a variety of functions (e.g. PMPs, MP3s, and electronic dictionaries) as well as driver information systems.
Keywords
Driver information system (DIS); Metaphor; Menu naming & grouping; Mental model;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Marcus, A., Managing metaphors for advanced user interface, Proceedingsof the Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces: AVI '94, pp. 12-18,New York, 1994.   DOI
2 Neale, D. C. and Carroll, J. M., The role of metaphors in user interfacedesign. In M. Helender, T. K. Landauer, and P. Prahbu (Eds.),Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 441-462, SciencePublishers, 1997.
3 Pemberton, L., Offices balconies, doors and corridors: an experimentalinterface metaphor for integrating collaborative design styles, Lecturenotes in computer science, 733, pp. 419-420, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Rauch, T., Leone, P. and Gillihan, D., Enabling the book metaphor for theWorld Wide Web: Dissemination on-line information as dynamicWeb documents, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication,40(2), pp. 113-128, 1997.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Serafin, C., Williams, M., Paelke, G. and Green, P., Functions and Featuresof Future Driver Information Systems. Technical Report UMTRI-91-16. University of Michigan, 1993.
6 Smyth, M., Anderson, B. and Alty, J. L., Metaphor reflections and a toolfor thought. In M.A.R. Kirby, A.J. Dix, and J.E. Finlay (Eds.), Peopleand Computers X, Proceedings of HCI '95, Cambridge UniversityPress, pp. 137-150, 1995.
7 Tepper, A., Future assessment by metaphors. Behaviour & InformationTechnology, 12(6), pp. 336-345, 1993.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Vaananen, K. and Schmidt, J., User interfaces for hypermedia: How to findgood metaphor?, Proceedings of the CHI '94 Short Papers, pp.263-264, New York, Association for Computing Machinery, 1994.   DOI
9 Verplank, B., Sketching metaphors: Graphical invention and user interfacedesign. Proceedings of the '91 International Symposium on NextGeneration Human Interface, pp. 1-8, 1991.
10 Webb, J. and Kramer, A., Maps or analogies? A comparison of instructionalaids for menu navigation, Human Factors, 32(3), pp. 251-266, 1990.   DOI
11 Root, R. W., Design of a multi-media vehicle for social browsing,Proceedings of CSCW '88. Portland, Oregon, pp. 25-38, 1988.   DOI
12 Roske-Hofstrand, R. and Paap, K., Cognitive networks as a guide to menuorganization: An application in the automated cockpit, Ergonomics,29(11), pp. 1301-1311, 1986.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 곽지영, 화면이 제한된 제품의 메뉴 설계 방안, 석사학위논문, 포항공과대학교, 1995.
14 Apple Computer Inc., HyperCard stack design guidelines, Addison-WesleyInc, 1989.
15 Gentner, D., Falkenhainer, B. and Storstad, J., Metaphor: The good, the badand the ugly. Proceedings of ACM SIGART Conference on TheoreticalIssues in Natural Language Processing, New Mexico State University,NM, 1987.
16 양희철, 개인정보단말기 사용자 인터페이스를 위한 메타포 개발 방법론. 박사학위논문. 포항공과대학교, 2005.
17 Alty, J. L., Knott, R. P., Anderson, B. and Smyth, M., A framework forengineering metaphor at the user interface, Interacting with Computers,13, pp. 301-322, 2000.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Andrews, K. and Kappe, F., Strait-jacketing authors: user interface consistencyin large-scale hypermedia system, Proceedings of InternationalHypermedia Conference '93, pp. 130-137, Berlin, Springer-Verlag,1993.
19 Apple Computer Inc., 1991. QuickTime design guidelines, Apple Computer,1991.
20 Beck, J., Han, S. H. and Park, J., Presenting a sub-menu window for menusearch on a cellular phone, International Journal of Human-ComputerInteraction, 20(3), pp. 223-246, 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Carr, R. M., The point of the pen, Byte, 16(2), pp. 211-221, 1991.
22 Carroll, J. M. and Mack, R. L., Metaphor, computing systems and activelearning, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22(1), pp.39-57, 1985.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Montgomery, D.C., Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th ed., Wiley,2001.
24 박용성, 박원규, 조영석, 한성호, 운전자 정보시스템용 사용자 인터페이스 설계: 메뉴 구조, 인터랙션 방식 및 메타포에 대해, 2008 대한산업공학회 추계학술대회, 한양대학교, 서울, 2008.
25 Carroll, J. M., Mack, R. L. and Kellogg, W. A. Interface metaphors anduser interface design. In: M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of humancomputerinteraction, pp. 67-85, North-Holland, 1988.
26 Henderson, D. A. and Card, S. K., Rooms: the use of multiple virtualworkspaces to reduce contention in a window-based graphical userinterface. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5(3), pp. 211-243, 1986.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Erickson, T. D., Working with interface metaphors. In: B. Laurel (Ed.), Theart of human-computer interface design, pp. 65-73, Addison-WesleyInc., 1990.
28 Gillan, D. J. and Bias, R. G., Use and abuse of metaphor in humancomputerinteraction. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conferenceon Systems, Man and Cybernatics, pp. 1434-1439, New York,1994.   DOI
29 Green, P., Motor vehicle driver interfaces. In J. Jacko and A. Sears (Eds.),The human-computer interaction handbook, pp. 844-860, LawrenceErlbaum Associates, 2002.
30 Hesel, D. R. and Hirsch, R. M., Statistical methods in water resources, U.S. Department of Interior, 2002.
31 Hutchins, E., Metaphors for interface design. In Taylor, M.M., Neel, F., and Bouwhuis, D.G. (Eds.), The structure of multimodal dialogue, pp. 11-28, Elsvier Science Publishers, 1989.
32 Kay, A., User interface: a personal view. In B. Laurel and S. J. Mountford(Eds.), The art of human computer interface design, pp. 191-207,Addison-Wesley Inc., 1990.
33 Levialdi, S., Cognition, models and metaphors, Proceedings of the IEEEWorkshop on Visual Languages, pp. 69-79, Piscataway, NJ. 1990.   DOI
34 MacLean, A., Bellotti, V., Young, R. and Moran, T., Reaching throughanalogy: A design rationale perspective on roles of analogy,Proceedings of ACM CHI '91 Conference on Human Factors inComputing Systems, pp. 162-172, New York, 1991.   DOI
35 Madsen, K. H., A guide to metaphorical design, Communications of theACM, 37(12), 57-62, 1994.   DOI   ScienceOn