Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2009.28.2.027

Grip Force, Finger Force, and Comfort analyses of Young and Old People by Hand Tool Handle Shapes  

Kong, Yong-Ku (Department of Systems Management Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
Sohn, Seong-Tae (Department of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
Kim, Dae-Min (Department of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
Jung, Myung-Chul (Industrial and Information Systems Engineering, Ajou University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea / v.28, no.2, 2009 , pp. 27-34 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate aging (young and old), gender (male and female), and handle shape effects on grip force, finger force, and subjective comfort. Four handle shapes of A, D, I, and V were implemented by a multi-finger force measurement (MFFM) system which was developed to measure every finger force with different grip spans. Forty young (20 males and 20 females) and forty old (20 males and 20 females) subjects participated in twelve gripping tasks and rated their comfort for all handles using a 5-point scale. Grip forces were calculating by summation of all four forces of the index, middle, ring and little fingers. Results showed that young males (283.2N) had larger gripping force than old males (235.6N), while young females (151.4N) had lower force than old females (153.6N). Young subjects exerted the largest gripping force with D-shape due to large contribution of the index and middle fingers and the smallest with A-shape; however, old subjects exerted the largest with I-shape and the smallest with V-shape due to small contribution of the ring and little fingers. As expected, the middle finger had the largest finger force and the little finger had the smallest. The fraction of contribution of index and ring fingers to grip force differed among age groups. Interestingly, young subjects provided larger index finger force than ring finger force, whereas old subjects showed that larger ring finger forces than index finger force in the griping tasks. In the relationship between performance and subjective comfort, I-shape exerting the largest grip force had less comfort than D-shape producing the second largest grip force. The findings of this study can provide guidelines on designing hand tool handle to obtain better performance as well as users' comfort.
Keywords
Grip force; Finger force; Handle shape; Aging; MFFM system;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 정명철, 김대민, 공용구, 파지 폭과 손 크기에 따른 각 손가락이 총악력에 미치는 영향 분석, 대한인간공학회지, 26(3), 1-7, 2007.
2 통계청, 기초통계조사, 2004.
3 Agnew, P. J. and Maas, F., Hand function related to age and sex. Archivesof Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63, 269-271, 1982.
4 Amis, A. A., Variation of finger forces in maximal isometric grasp tests ona range of cylindrical diameters, Journal of Biomedical Engineering,9, 313-320, 1987.   DOI
5 Backman, C. and Daniels, L., A description of grip and pinch strength inchildren aged 6-11 years using the Martin Vigorimeter. CanadianJournal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 234-244, 1996.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Balogun, J. A., Akinloye, A. A. and Adenlola, S. A., Grip strength as afunction of age, height, body weight and Quetelet index. PhysiotherapyTheory and Practice, 7, 111-119, 1991.   DOI
7 Desrosiers, J., Bravo, G., Hmbert, R. and Dutil, E., Normative data for gripstrength of elderly men and women. American Journal of OccupationalTherapy, 49, 637-644, 1995.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Eksioglu, M., Relative optimum grip span as a function of hand Anthropometry.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 12, 219-230, 2004.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Fess, E. E., Documentation: Essential elements of an upper extremityassessment battery. Rehabilitation of the hand: Surgery and therapy4th ed., 1, 185-214, St Louis: Mosby, 1995.
10 Fraser, C. J. and Benten, J., A study of adult hand strength. British Journalof Occupational Therapy, 46, 296-299, 1983.   DOI
11 Fullwood, D., Australian norms for hand and finger strength of boys andgirls aged 5-12 years. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 33,26-36, 1986.   DOI
12 Kim, D. M. and Kong, Y. K., Development of an Adjustable Multi-FingerForce Measurement (MFFM) System for research on hand tool-relatedmusculoskeletal disorders. Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics2nd international conference, Las Vegas, 14-17 July, 2008.
13 세계보건기구(WHO), 세계보건기구 통계 시스템(WHOSIS) UN, 세계인구현황보고서, 2008.
14 이동춘, 장규표, 한국성인의 악력특성분석에 관한 연구, 대한인간공학회지, 16(1), 73-83, 1997.   과학기술학회마을
15 김대민, 공용구, MFFM System을 이용한 손가락 별 파지 폭들의 변화에 따른 악력 및 개인 선호도에 대한 연구, 대한인간공학회지, 27(3), 1-6, 2008.
16 Kong, Y. K., Freivalds, A. and Kim, S.E., Evaluation of hook handles in apulling task. International Journal of Occupational Safety andErgonomics, 11(3), 303-313, 2005.   DOI
17 산업연구원, 산업경제정보, 2007.
18 Ketchum, L. D., Thompson, D. G., Pocock, G. D., La, C. and Wallingford,D., A clinical study of forces generated by the intrinsic muscles ofthe index finger and the extrinsic flexor and extensor muscles of thehand. The Journal Hand of Surgery, 3(6), 571-578, 1978.   DOI
19 Kong, Y. K. and Freivalds, A., Evaluation of meat-hoot handle shapes.International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 32, 13-23, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Kong, Y. K. and Lowe, B. D., Optimal cylindrical handle diameter for gripforce tasks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35, 495-507, 2005a.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Kong, Y. K. and Lowe, B. D., Evaluation of handle diameters andorientations in a maximum torque task. International Journal ofIndustrial Ergonomics, 35, 1073-1084, 2005b.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Berryhill, H., Returning the worker with an upper extremity injury toindustry: A model for the physician and therapist. Journal of HandTherapy, 3, 56-63, 1990.   DOI
23 Blackwell, J. R., Kornatz, K. W. and Heath, E. M., Effect of grip span onmaximal grip force and fatigue of flexor digitorum superficialis,Applied Ergonomics, 30, 401-405, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Blair, S. J., McCormick, E., Bear-Lehman, J., Fess, E. E. and Rader, E.,Evaluation of impairment of the upper extremity. Clinical Orthopaedicsand Related Research, 221, 42-58, 1987.
25 Chengalur, S. N., Smith, G. A., Nelson, R. C. and Sadoff, A. M., Assessingsincerity of effort in maximal grip strength tests. American Journalof Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 148-153, 1990.   DOI
26 Schultz, K., Upper extremity functional capacity evaluation. In J. M. Hunter.E. J. Mackin, and A. D. Callahan (Eds). Rehabilitation of the hand:Surgery and therapy 4th ed., 2, 1739-1774. 1995.
27 Crosby, C. A., Wehbe, M. A. and Mawr, B., Hand strength: Normativevalues. Journal of Hand Surgery, 19A, 665-670, 1994.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Robertson, L. D., Mullinax, C. M., Brodowicz, G. R. and Swafford, A. R.,Muscular fatigue patterning in power grip assessment. Journal ofOccupational Rehabilitation, 6, 71-85, 1996.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Schmidt, R. T. and Toews, J. V., Grip strength as measured by the Jamardynamometer. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 51,321-327, 1970.
30 Stokes, H. M., Landrieu, K. W., Domangue, B. and Kunen, S., Identificationof low-effort patients through dynamometry. Journal of Hand Surgery,20A, 1047-1056, 1995.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Gilbertson, L. and Barber S., Power and pinch grip strength recorded usingthe hand-held Jamar dynamometer and B+L hydraulic pinch gauge:British normative data for adults. British Journal of OccupationalTherapy, 57, 483-488, 1994.   DOI
32 Grant, K. A., Habes, D. J. and Steward, L. L., An analysis of handledesigns for reducing manual effort: The influence of grip diameter,International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 10, 199-206, 1992.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Harth, A. and Vetter, W. R., Grip and pinch strength among selected adultoccupational groups. Occupational Therapy International, 1, 13-28,1994.   DOI
34 Hamilton, A., Balnave, R. and Adams, R., Grip strength as a measure ofsincerity of effort in occupational rehabilitation. Journal of OccupationalHealth and Safety: Australia and New Zealand, 12, 547-556,1996.
35 Mathiowetz, V. K., Weber, K. G., Volland, G. K. and Kashman, N.,Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. Journalof Hand Surgery, 9A, 222-226, 1984.
36 Harward, B. M. and Griffin, M. J., Repeatability of grip strength anddexterity tests and the effects of age and gender. International Archivesof Occupational and Environmental Health, 75, 111-119, 2002.
37 Kuzala, E. A. and Vargo, M. C., The relationship between elbow positionand grip strength. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 509-512, 1992.
38 Lee, J. W. and Rim, K., Maximum finger force prediction using a planarsimulation of the middle finger. Proceedings Institute Mechanical Engineers, 204, 169-178, 1990.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Mogk, J. and Keir, P., Prediction of forearm muscle activity during gripping.Ergonomics, 49(11), 1121-1130, 2006.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Petrofsky, J. S., Williams, C., Kamen, G. and Lind, A. R., The effect ofhandgrip span on isometric exercise performance. Ergonomics, 23(12),1129-1135, 1980.   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Pheasant, S. T. and Scriven, J. G., Sex differences in strength: Some implications for the design of handtools, Proceedings of the ErgonomicsSociety's Annual Conference, 9-13, Santa Monica, CA, 1983.
42 Williams, K. A., Functional capacity evaluation of the upper extremity.Work, 1, 48-64, 1990.
43 Radhakrishnan, S. and Nagaravindra, M., Analysis of hand forces in healthand disease during maximum isometric grasping of cylinders.Medicine and Biological Engineering and Computing, 31, 372-376,1993.   DOI
44 Swanson, A. B. Hagert, C. G. and Swanson, G. D., Evaluation ofimpairment of hand function. In J. M. Hunter, E. J. Mackin and A. D.Callahan (eds), Rehabilitation of the hand: Surgery and therapy 4thed, 2, 1839-1896, St Louis: Mosby, 1995.
45 Talsania, J. S. and Kozin, S. H., Normal digital contribution to grip strengthassessed by a computerized digital dynamometer. The Journal ofHand Surgery, 23B(2), 162-166, 1998.   DOI   ScienceOn