Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2006.25.3.067

Implementation of the Perception Process in Human‐Vehicle Interactive Models(HVIMs) Considering the Effects of Auditory Peripheral Cues  

Rah, Chong-Kwan (Department of Industrial Engineering, Hanyang University)
Park, Min-Yong (Department of Industrial Engineering, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea / v.25, no.3, 2006 , pp. 67-75 More about this Journal
Abstract
HVIMs consists of simulated driver models implemented with series of mathematical functions and computerized vehicle dynamic models. To effectively model the perception process, as a part of driver models, psychophysical nonlinearity should be considered not only for the single-modal stimulus but for the stimulus of multiple modalities and interactions among them. A series of human factors experiments were conducted using the primary sensory of visual and auditory modalities to find out the effects of auditory cues in visual velocity estimation tasks. The variations of auditory cues were found to enhance/reduce the perceived intensity of velocity as the level changed. These results indicate that the conventional psychophysical power functions could not applied for the perception process of the HVIMs with multi-modal stimuli. 'Ruled surfaces' in a 3-D coordinate system(with the intensities of both kinds of stimuli and the ratio of enhancement, respectively for each coordinate) were suggested to model the realistic perception process of multi-modal HVIMs.
Keywords
Human-Vehicle interactive models; Cross-modal enhancement effect; Perception process;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Larsen, A., McIlhagga, W., Baert, J. and Bundesen, C., Seeing or hearing? Perceptual independence, modality confusions, and crossmodal congruity effects with focused and divided attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 65(4), 568-574, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Stevens, S. S., Issues in psychophysical measurement, Psychological Review, 78(5), 426-450, 1971   DOI
3 Penhallegon, J. W., Effects of display type, age, and gender on driving performance and simulator-induced sickness in a medium-fidelity driving simulator. M.S. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, 2003
4 Prokop, G., Model of human vehicle driving - A predictive nonlinear opti mization approach. California-PATH Research Report UCB-ITS-RR- 2000-19. Institute of transportation studies, University of California, Berkeley, 2000
5 Driver, J. and Spence, C., Crossmodal attention, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8(2), 245-253, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Stevens, S. S., Perceptual magnitude and its measurement, In Carterette, E. C. and Friedman, M. P. (Eds.), Handbook of perception, Academic Press, London, 361-364, 1974
7 Strayer, L. D. and Drews, A. F., Profiles in driver distraction: effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers, Human Factors, 46(4), 640-649, 2004   DOI
8 Underwood, G., Crundall, D. and Chapman, P., Selective searching while driving: the role of experience in hazard detection and general surveillance, Ergonomics, 45(1), 1-12, 2002   DOI
9 Guerrier, J. H., Manivannan, P. and Nair, S. N., The role of working memory, field dependence, visual search, and reaction time in the left turn performance of older female drivers, Applied Ergonomics, 30(2), 109-119, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Labiale, G., Cognitive ergonomics and intelligent systems in the automobile, In Ergonomics and Safety of Intelligent Driver Interfaces, edited by Noy, Y. I., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 169-177, 1997
11 Keppel, G. and Wickens, D. C., Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook, 4th Ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, a: 380-393; b: 401-428, 2004
12 Stein, E. B., London, N., Wilkinson, K. L. and Price, D. D., Enhancement of perceived visual intensity by auditory stimuli: A psychophysical analysis, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 497-506, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Trick, M. L., Enns, T. J., Mills, J. and Vavrik, J., Paying attention behind the wheel: a framework for studying the role of attention in driving, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(5), 385- 424, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Prokop, G., A human model using continuous model predictive optimization, Proceedings of the Conference of the Driver in the 21th Century, Berlin, VDI report vol. 1613, 219-237, 2001
15 Rogers, A. W., Lee, D. M. and Fisk, D. A., Contextual effects on general learning, feature learning, and attention strengthening in visual search, Human Factors, 37(1), 158-172, 1995   DOI
16 Stanney, M. K., Hale, S. K., Nahmens, I. and Kennedy S. R., What to expect from immersive virtual environment exposure: Influences of gender, body mass index, and past experience, Human Factors, 45(3), 504-520, 2003   DOI
17 Middleton, H. and Westwood, D., Human interaction with automotive technologies: Specification and measurement of driver abilities, International Conference on Advanced Driver Assistance Systems, IEE, 25-37, 2001
18 Patton, E. P. and Anastasio, J. T., Modeling cross-modal enhancement and modality-specific suppression in multisensory neurons, Neural Computation, 15(4), 783-810, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Park, M. and Rah, C., Human factors considerations for human-vehicle interactive models to enhance safety of intelligent vehicles, Proceedings of the XIX Annual International Occupational Ergonomics and Safety Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 27-29 June, 46-51, 2005
20 나종관, 박민용, 참여형 멀티미디어 시스템 사용자 감성평가를 위 한 다차원 심물리학적 척도 체계, 대한인간공학회지, 23(3), 89 -99, 2004
21 Duncan, J., Martens, S. and Ward, R., Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities, Nature, 387(6635), 808-810, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Delorme, D. and Song, B., Human driver model for SmartAHS. California PATH Research Report UCB-ITS-PRR-2001-12. Institute of transportation studies, University of California, Berkeley, 2001
23 Wickens, D. C. and Hollands, G. J., Engineering psychology and human performance 3rd Ed. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 260-261, 2000
24 성원석, 황원걸, 임형은, 景山一郞, 차량의 조향 시뮬레이션을 위한 운전자 모델에 대한 연구, 한국자동차공학회 논문집, 10(3), 245-253, 2002
25 Luce, D. R., Where is mathematical modeling in psychology headed?, Theory and Psychology, 9(6), 723-737, 1999   DOI
26 Min, B. C., Chung, S. C., Min, Y. K. and Sakamoto, K., Psychophysiological evaluation of simulator sickness evoked by a graphic simulator. Applied Ergonomics, 35(6), 549-556, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Marsden, G., Brackstone, M. and McDonald, M., Assessment of the stop and go function using real driving behavior, Proceedings of the conference of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (IEE Conf. Publ. No. 483), 76-80, 2001
28 민석기, 이경수, 운전자 운전특성 파라미터를 고려한 지능화 차량 의 차간 거리 적응 제어, 한국자동차공학회 2002년도 전기/ 전자 부문, I.T.S. 부문 학술강연논문집, 103-108, 2002
29 Hoffmann, R. E. and Mortimer, G. R., Scaling of relative velocity between vehicles, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 28(4), 415-421, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Odgaard, C. E., Arieh, Y. and Marks, E. L., Crossmodal enhancement of perceived brightness: Sensory interaction versus response bias, Perception & Psychophysics, 65(1), 123-132, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Neusser, S., Nijhuis, J., Spaanenburg, Hoefflinger, B., Franke, U. and Fritz, H., Neurocontrol for lateral vehicle guidance, IEEE Micro, 13, 57-66, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Marks, E. L. and Gescheider, A. G., Psychophysical scaling, In Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology, 3rd. Ed., volume 4., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 91-101, 2002