Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2006.25.2.125

A Systematic Method of Hinting Interface Design  

Lee, Eun-A (한국과학기술원)
Yun, Wan-Cheol (한국과학기술원)
Park, Wan-Su (한국과학기술원)
Publication Information
Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea / v.25, no.2, 2006 , pp. 125-134 More about this Journal
Abstract
Most users learn new, complex systems through trial-and-error experience rather than referring to the manuals in a cognitive process that is called 'exploratory learning'. While exploring a system, people find prototypical rules for using the system based especially on frequent tasks. The rules are formed from consistent task procedures and well-expected interface elements on the designed system. These rules play the role of the basis of users' knowledge for performing tasks. The decision making to select and apply those rules interacting with an interface can be aided by properly provided hints on the interface. With appropriate hints, users can learn new systems easily and use them with reduced usability problems. This paper first reports an observation of user behavior performing tasks with prototypical interaction rules and finds a sound set of criteria to extract prototypical interaction rules systematically. Two types of hints are defined. Extending hints prompt users to apply prototypical interaction rules beyond well-known tasks. Preventive hints guide users out of possible capture errors by drawing attention to the variation of rules. A systematic and practical method is proposed to identify the opportunities for both types in designing interfaces. It is then verified through a usability test that the proposed method is effective in identifying the locations and types of appropriate hints to reduce or mitigate usability problems.
Keywords
Exploratory learning; User knowledge; Hinting interface;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Lee, Dong-Seok, Designing system interaction reflection users' knowledge and interface development, Doctoral Thesis (DIE 04002). Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology: Korea, 2004
2 Nielsen, J., Usability Engineering, AP Professional: Florida, 1993
3 Rieman, J., A Field Study of Exploratory Learning Strategies, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 3(3), 189-218. 1996   DOI
4 Schiele, F. and Green T., HCI Formalism and Cognitive Psychology: the Case of Task-Action Grammar, In M. Harrison and H. Thimbleby (Ed), Formal Methods in Human-Computer Interaction, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1989
5 Wai-Tat, Fu. and Wayne D. G., Resolving the Paradox of the Active User: Stable Suboptimal Performance in Interactive Tasks. Cognitive Science, 28, 901-935, 2004   DOI
6 Yoon, W. C., Task-Interface Matching: How We May Design User Interfaces, Proceedings of IEA, 24-29, 2003
7 Yoon, W. C., Identifying, Organizing and Exploring Problem Space for Interaction Design, Proceedings of the 8th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium on Human-Machine Systems, 81-86, 2001
8 Yoon, W. C. and Park, J. S., User Interface Design and Evaluation based on Task Analysis, Proceedings of ICPR, 598-601, 1997
9 Yoon, W. C., Park, J. and Lee, S. H.,A Diagrammatic Model for Representing User's Interface Knowledge of Task Procedures, Proceedings of Cognitive Systems Engineering in Process Control, 276-284, 1996
10 Shneiderman. B., Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, Addison Wesley Longman: Tokyo, 1999