Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2005.24.2.025

The Structuring Process of Multi‐Centered Usability Evaluation Method  

Kim, Jung-Yong (한양대학교 산업공학과)
Lee, Ha-Yeun (LG전자 MC사업본부)
Choi, Young-Cheol (한양대학교 산업공학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea / v.24, no.2, 2005 , pp. 25-33 More about this Journal
Abstract
In order to minimize a biased view of evaluators in usability test, a multiple evaluation method so called Multi-Centered Usability Evaluation Method(MCUEM) was suggested and structured in this study. To use MCUEM, the existing evaluation methods were re-categorized into 'developer and evaluator-centered', 'evaluator-centered', 'user-centered', 'evaluator and user-centered', and the 'developer, evaluator, and user-centered methods. Furthermore, in order to verify the relevance of MCUEM, the usability of mobile phone was tested in this study. In results, it was found that different evaluation methods generated greatly different results, that showed the risk of using a particular usability method due to different perspectives of evaluators. At the same time, it was found that MCUEM could greatly minimize such biases. Therefore, it was concluded that using MCUEM could help the usability engineer design a test protocol with a minimal risk of bias due to different perspective of evaluators.
Keywords
Usability; Multi-Centered Usability Evaluation Method(MCUEM); Mobile phone;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 이하연, 김정룡., '휴대전화 인터페이스에 대한 다중심적 사용편의성 평가', 대한인간공학회 추계학술대회, 용평리조트, 11월 29일, p259-262, 2002
2 임치환, '사용성 평가 방법들의 비교 및 선택', 한국공업경영학회지, Vol. 19, No. 37, 87-94, 1996
3 Nielsen, J., 'Usability Inspection Methods', Proceedings ACM CHI Conference, http://acm.org/sigchi/chi9 5/proceedings/tuters/jn_bdy.htm, 1995
4 Hom, J., 'Usability Toolbox,' http://jthom.best.vwh.net/usability/, 1996
5 Perlman, G., 'Practical Usability Evaluation', Proceedings ACM CHI Conference, 1996
6 Jeffries, R., Miler, J. R., Wharton, C. and Uyeda, K. M., 'User Interface Evaluation in the Real World: A Comparison of Four Techniques', Proceedings ACM CHI Conference, 119-123, 1991