Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2004.23.3.053

A New Approach to Product Risk Analysis for Safe Product Design  

An, Chan-Sik (동국대학교 산업공학과)
Jo, Am (동국대학교 산업공학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea / v.23, no.3, 2004 , pp. 53-72 More about this Journal
Abstract
Today we are observing a lot of injuries, casualties, and property losses that are mainly caused by the defects of products. In order to derive safety designs, which minimize the possibility of such product liability-related accidents, we need to take into account the user-product interaction as an important part of the danger factor analysis. Existing risk analysis techniques, however, have some limitations in detecting comprehensive danger factors that are peculiarly involved in human errors and the functional defects of products. Researches on danger factor analysis regarding the user-product interaction have been carried out actively in ergonomics. In this paper, we suggest a novel product risk analysis technique, which is more objective and systematic compared to the previous ones, by combining a modified TAFEI (Task Analysis For Error Identification) technique with SASA (Systematic Approach to Accident Scenario Analysis) technique. By applying this technique to the product design practice in industry, corporations will be able to improve the product safety, consequently strengthening the competitiveness.
Keywords
product defect; user-product interaction; Product Risk Analysis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Wilson, J. R., The collection and interpretation of domestic accident data: A discussion on some aspects of the British consumer safety system. Applied Ergonomics, 10(2), pp. 71-78, 1979
2 Yules, R. B., Human factors experts in product liability litigation. Journal of Products and Toxics Liability, 9(2), pp. 107-132, 1986
3 김진윤, 권영국, 소비자의 안전을 위한 제조물 책임에 관한 연구, 관동대학교, 2001
4 이동훈, 변승남, 제조물 책임과 제품 안전정책. 경희대학교, 2002
5 山口正久. 入門PL法. 日科技連. 1994
6 Drury, C. G. and Brill, M., Human factors in consumer product accident investigation. Human Factors. 25, pp. 329-342, 1983
7 Baber. C. and Stanton. N. A., Task analysis for error identification: A methodology for designing error-tolerant consumer products, Ergonomics. 37(11), pp. 1923-1941, 1994
8 Benedyk, R. and Minister, S., Evaluation of product safety using the BeSafe method. In Stanton. N (Ed). Human Factors in Consumer Products, Taylor & Francis. London. 1998
9 Cushman, W. H. and Rogenberg, D. J. Designing safer products, In G. Salvendy(Ed), Advanced in Human Factors/Ergonomics. 14, pp. 315-335, 1991
10 Dong-Hoon, Lee. A Systematic Approach to Accident Scenario Analysis for design for Designing Safer Product. Kyung Hee. 2000
11 OECD., Product safety. Risk management and cost-benefit analysis. Committee on Consumer Policy, Paris, 1983
12 Pulz. S. D., Accident Analysis for prevention: The role of the human factors specialist in accident reconstruction. Professional Safety, 32(3), pp. 38-41, 1987
13 Stanton, N. and Baber, C., A systems analysis of consumer products. In Stanton. N (Ed). Human Factors in Consumer Products. Taylor & Francis. London. 1998
14 Wang, J. and Ruxton, T., Design for safety, Professional Safety, 42(1), pp. 24-29, 1997
15 Warne, C. A. Designig out accidents-first understand the problem. Applied Ergonomics, 13. pp. 2-6, 1982