Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2022.38.6.4.5

Performance of Support Vector Machine for Classifying Land Cover in Optical Satellite Images: A Case Study in Delaware River Port Area  

Ramayanti, Suci (Department of Science Education, Kangwon National University)
Kim, Bong Chan (Department of Science Education, Kangwon National University)
Park, Sungjae (Department of Smart Regional Innovation, Kangwon National University)
Lee, Chang-Wook (Department of Science Education, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Remote Sensing / v.38, no.6_4, 2022 , pp. 1911-1923 More about this Journal
Abstract
The availability of high-resolution satellite images provides precise information without direct observation of the research target. Korea Multi-Purpose Satellite (KOMPSAT), also known as the Arirang satellite, has been developed and utilized for earth observation. The machine learning model was continuously proven as a good classifier in classifying remotely sensed images. This study aimed to compare the performance of the support vector machine (SVM) model in classifying the land cover of the Delaware River port area on high and medium-resolution images. Three optical images, which are KOMPSAT-2, KOMPSAT-3A, and Sentinel-2B, were classified into six land cover classes, including water, road, vegetation, building, vacant, and shadow. The KOMPSAT images are provided by Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI), and the Sentinel-2B image was provided by the European Space Agency (ESA). The training samples were manually digitized for each land cover class and considered the reference image. The predicted images were compared to the actual data to obtain the accuracy assessment using a confusion matrix analysis. In addition, the time-consuming training and classifying were recorded to evaluate the model performance. The results showed that the KOMPSAT-3A image has the highest overall accuracy and followed by KOMPSAT-2 and Sentinel-2B results. On the contrary, the model took a long time to classify the higher-resolution image compared to the lower resolution. For that reason, we can conclude that the SVM model performed better in the higher resolution image with the consequence of the longer time-consuming training and classifying data. Thus, this finding might provide consideration for related researchers when selecting satellite imagery for effective and accurate image classification.
Keywords
Support vector machine (SVM); High-resolution image; KOMPSAT; Land cover classification;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Eid, A. N. M., C.O. Olatubara, T.A. Ewemoje, H. Farouk, and M.T. El-Hennawy, 2020. Coastal wetland vegetation features and digital change detection mapping based on remotely sensed imagery: El-Burullus Lake, Egypt, International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 8(1): 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2020.01.004   DOI
2 Hamilton, D., K. Brothers, C. McCall, B. Gautier, and T. Shea, 2021. Mapping forest burn extent from hyperspatial imagery using machine learning, Remote Sensing, 13(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13193843   DOI
3 Lu, D. and Q. Weng, 2005. Urban classification using full spectral information of Landsat ETM+ imagery in Marion County, Indiana, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 71(11): 1275-1284. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.71.11.1275   DOI
4 Lu, D. and Q. Weng, 2007. A survey of image classification Methods and techniques for improving classification performance, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(5): 823-870. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600746456   DOI
5 Maxwell, A.E., T.A. Warner, and L.A. Guillen, 2021. Accuracy assessment in convolutional neural network-based deep learning remote sensing studies-part 1: Literature review, Remote Sensing, 13(13): 2450. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132450   DOI
6 Morgan, G.R., C. Wang, Z. Li, S.R. Schill, and D.R. Morgan, 2022. Deep learning of high-resolution aerial imagery for coastal marsh change detection: A comparative study, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(2): 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11020100   DOI
7 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of GIS, 2015. Land Use/Land Cover of New Jersey 2015, https://njogis-newjersey.opendata.arcgis.com, Accessed on Nov. 4, 2022.
8 Philadelphia City Planning Commission, 2014. Land use, https://metadata.phila.gov, Accessed on Nov. 4, 2022.
9 Rhee, S., J. Jeong, T. Lee, and T. Kim, 2011. DEM generation and accuracy comparison from multiple Kompsat-2 images, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(1): 51-58 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.7780/KJRS.2011.27.1.051   DOI
10 Acharya,T.D., D.H. Lee,I.T.Yang, and J.K. Lee, 2016. Identification of water bodies in a Landsat 8 OLI image using a J48 decision tree, Sensors, 16(7): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16071075   DOI
11 Almaz, O.A. and T. Altiok, 2012. Simulation modeling of the vessel traffic in Delaware River: Impact of deepening on port performance, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 22: 146-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2011.12.004   DOI
12 Altiok, T., O.A. Almaz, and A. Ghafoori, 2012. Modeling and Analysis of the Vessel Traffic in the Delaware River and Bay Area Risk Assessment and Mitigation, Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
13 Chen, D.M. and D. Stow, 2002. The effect of training strategies on supervised classification at different spatial resolutions, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 68(11): 1155-1161.
14 Foody, G.M. andA. Mathur, 2004.Arelative evaluation of multiclass image classification by support vector machines, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(6): 1335-1343. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.827257   DOI
15 Kim, C., 2016. Land use classification and land use change analysis using satellite images in Lombok Island, Indonesia, Forest Science and Technology, 12(4): 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2016.1147498   DOI
16 Mathur, A. and G.M. Foody, 2008. Multiclass and binary SVM classification: Implications for training and classification users, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 5(2): 241-245. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2008.915597   DOI
17 Moore, S., 2021. Toward effective river basin management (RBM): The politics of cooperation, sustainability, and collaboration in the Delaware River basin, Journal of Environmental Management, 298: 113421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113421   DOI
18 Nur, A.S., S. Park, K.J. Lee, J. Moon, and C.W. Lee, 2020. Mapping of post-wildfire burned area using KOMPSAT-3A and sentinel-2 imagery: The case of Sokcho wildfire, Korea, Korean Journal ofRemote Sensing, 36(6-2): 1551-1565. https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2020.36.6.2.6   DOI
19 Sheykhmousa, M., M. Mahdianpari, H. Ghanbari, F. Mohammadimanesh, P. Ghamisi, and S. Homayouni, 2020. Support vector machine Versus random forest for remote sensing image classification: A meta-analysis and systematic review, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 13: 6308-6325. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3026724   DOI
20 Talukdar, S., P. Singha, S. Mahato, Shahfahad, S. Pal, Y.A. Liou, and A. Rahman, 2020. Land-use land-cover classification by machine learning classifiers for satellite observations-A review, Remote Sensing, 12(7): 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071135   DOI
21 Gonzalez-Perez, A., A. Abd-Elrahman, B. Wilkinson, D.J. Johnson, and R.R. Carthy, 2022. Deep and machine learning image classification of coastal wetlands using unpiloted aircraft system multispectral images and lidar datasets, Remote Sensing, 14(16): 3937. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14163937   DOI
22 Kauffman Jr., G.J., 2010. The Delaware River revival: four centuries of historic water quality change from Henry Hudson to Benjamin Franklin to JFK, Pennsylvania History: A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies, 77(4): 432-465. https://doi.org/10.5325/pennhistory.77.4.0432   DOI
23 Acharya, T.D., I.T. Yang, and D.H. Lee, 2016. Land cover classification using a KOMPSAT-3A multi-spectral satellite image, Applied Sciences, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/app6110371   DOI
24 Baek, W.K. and H.S. Jung, 2021. Performance comparison of oil spill and ship classification from X-band dual-and single-polarized SAR image using support vector machine, random forest, and deep neural network, Remote Sensing, 13(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163203   DOI
25 Zhou, Q., B. Li, and A. Kurban, 2008. Trajectory Analysis of land cover change in arid environment of China, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29(4): 1093-1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160701355256   DOI
26 Srivastava, P.K., D. Han, M.A. Rico-Ramirez, M. Bray, and T. Islam, 2012. Selection of classification techniques for land use/land cover change investigation, Advances in Space Research, 50(9): 1250-1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.06.032   DOI
27 Syifa, M., M. Panahi, and C.W. Lee, 2020. Mapping of post-wildfire burned area using a hybrid algorithm and satellite data: The case of the camp fire wildfire in California, USA, Remote Sensing, 12(4): 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12040623   DOI
28 Youn, H. and J. Jeong, 2020. KOMPSAT-3A urban classification using machine learning algorithm - Focusing on Yang-jae in Seoul, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 36(6-2): 1567-1577 (in Korean with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2020.36.6.2.7   DOI
29 McGlinchy, J., B. Johnson, B. Muller, M. Joseph, and J. Diaz, 2019. Application of UNET fully convolutional neural network to impervious surface segmentation in urban environment from high resolution satellite imagery, Proc. of 2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Yokohama, Japan, Jul. 28-Aug. 2, pp. 3915-3918. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8900453   DOI