1 |
Kim, Y., T. H. Kim, J. B. Kyung, C. S. Cho, J. H. Choi, and C. U. Choi, 2017. Preliminary study on rupture mechanism of the 9.12 Gyeongju Earthquake, Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, 53(3): 407-422 (in Korean with English abstract).
DOI
|
2 |
Lee, S. and S. Oh, 2019. Assessment of regional seismic vulnerability in South Korea based on spatial analysis of seismic hazard information, Econ. Environ. Geol, 52(6): 573-586 228 (in Korean with English abstract).
DOI
|
3 |
Lee, S., M. Panahi, H. R. Pourghasemi, H. Shahabi, M. Alizadeh, A. Shirzadi, K. Khosravi, A. M. Melesse, M. Yekrangnia, and F. Rezaie, 2019. Sevucas: A novel gis-based machine learning software for seismic vulnerability assessment, Applied Sciences, 9(17): 3495.
DOI
|
4 |
Alam, M. S. and S. M. Haque, 2018. Assessment of urban physical seismic vulnerability using the combination of AHP and TOPSIS models: A case study of residential neighborhoods of Mymensingh city, Bangladesh, Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 6(2): 165.
DOI
|
5 |
Alizadeh, M., I. Ngah, M. Hashim, B. Pradhan, and A. B. Pour, 2018a. A hybrid analytic network process and artificial neural network (ANP-ANN) model for urban earthquake vulnerability assessment, Remote Sensing, 10(6): 975.
DOI
|
6 |
Alizadeh, M., M. Hashim, E. Alizadeh, H. Shahabi, M. R. Karami, A. Beiranvand Pour, B. Pradhan, and H. Zabihi, 2018b. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) model for seismic vulnerability assessment (SVA) of urban residential buildings, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(11): 444.
DOI
|
7 |
Liu, Y., Z. Li, B. Wei, X. Li, and B. Fu, 2019. Seismic vulnerability assessment at urban scale using data mining and GIScience technology: application to Urumqi (China), Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 10(1): 958-985.
DOI
|
8 |
MPSS (Ministry of Public Safety and Security), 2017. Report on the 9.12 earthquake and countermeasures, Ministry of the Interior and Safety, Seoul, KOR.
|
9 |
Nhu, V., D. Zandi, H. Shahabi, K. Chapi, A. Shirzadi, N. Al-Ansari, S. K. Singh, J. Dou, and H. Nguyen, 2020. Comparison of Support Vector Machine, Bayesian Logistic Regression, and Alternating Decision Tree Algorithms for Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping along a Mountainous Road in the West of Iran, Applied Sciences, 10(15): 5047.
DOI
|
10 |
Nyimbili, P. H., T. Erden, and H. Karaman, 2018. Integration of GIS, AHP and TOPSIS for earthquake hazard analysis, Natural Hazards, 92(3): 1523-1546.
DOI
|
11 |
Panahi, M., F. Rezaie, and S. Meshkani, 2014. Seismic vulnerability assessment of school buildings in Tehran city based on AHP and GIS, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 14(4): 969-979.
DOI
|
12 |
Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests, Machine Learning, 45(1): 5-32.
DOI
|
13 |
Chun, Y., 2017. A Study on Earthquake Hazard Mapping using Risk Factors, Proc. of Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science, Seoul, Korea, May. 25-26, pp. 125-126.
|
14 |
Cortes, C. and V. Vapnik, 1995. Support-vector networks, Machine Learning, 20(3): 273-297.
DOI
|
15 |
E-National Index., http://www.index.go.kr, Accessed on Dec. 1, 2020.
|
16 |
Gyeongju City Hall., http://www.gyeongju.go.kr, Accessed on Dec. 2, 2020.
|
17 |
Han, J. and J. Kim, 2019. A GIS-Based Seismic vulnerability mapping and assessment using AHP: A case study of Gyeongju, Korea, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 35(2): 217-228 (in Korean with English abstract).
DOI
|
18 |
Han, J., S. Park, S. Kim, S. Son, S. Lee, and J. Kim, 2019. Performance of Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machines for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Mapping: A Case Study of the 12 September 2016 ML5. 8 Gyeongju Earthquake, South Korea, Sustainability, 11(24): 7038.
DOI
|
19 |
Han, J. and J. Kim, 2020. Seismic vulnerability assessment and mapping using decision tree and frequency ratio: A case study of Gyeongju, South Korea, Proc. of Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science, Korea, Jun. 25-26, pp. 180-181.
|
20 |
Han, J., J. Kim, S. Park, S. Son, and M. Ryu, 2020. Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Mapping of Gyeongju, South Korea Using Frequency Ratio, Decision Tree, and Random Forest, Sustainability, 12(18): 7787.
DOI
|
21 |
Jena, R., B. Pradhan, and G. Beydoun, 2020a. Earthquake vulnerability assessment in Northern Sumatra province by using a multi-criteria decision-making model, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 46: 101518.
DOI
|
22 |
Jena, R., B. Pradhan, G. Beydoun, H. Sofyan, and M. Affan, 2020b. Integrated model for earthquake risk assessment using neural network and analytic hierarchy process: Aceh province, Indonesia, Geoscience Frontiers, 11(2): 613-634.
DOI
|
23 |
Jena, R., B. Pradhan, G. Beydoun, A. M. Alamri, and H. Sofyan, 2020c. Earthquake hazard and risk assessment using machine learning approaches at Palu, Indonesia, Science of The Total Environment, 749: 141582.
DOI
|
24 |
Kalantar, B., B. Pradhan, S. A. Naghibi, A. Motevalli, and S. Mansor, 2018. Assessment of the effects of training data selection on the landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural networks (ANN), Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 9(1): 49-69.
DOI
|
25 |
Kim, H. S., C. G. Sun, H. I. Cho, and J. H. Nam, 2018a. Regional Assessment of Seismic Site Effects and Induced Vulnerable Area in Gyeonggi-do, South Korea, Using GIS, Journal of The Korean Geotechnical Society, 34(5): 19-35 (in Korean with English abstract).
DOI
|
26 |
Kim, J., S. Lee, H. Jung, and S. Lee, 2018b. Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest and boosted tree models in Pyeong-Chang, Korea, Geocarto International, 33(9): 1000-1015.
DOI
|
27 |
Kim, K. H., S. Kang, I. S. Jang, and W. S. Park, 2009. Seismic hazard near the harbors using historic and instrumental earthquake data, Journal of Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers, 21(5): 419-425 (in Korean with English abstract).
|
28 |
Kim, K. H., T. S. Kang, J. Rhie, Y. Kim, Y. Park, S.Y. Kang, M. Han, J. Kim, J. Park, and M. Kim, 2016b. The 12 September 2016 Gyeongju earthquakes: 2. Temporary seismic network for monitoring aftershocks, Geosciences Journal, 20(6): 753-757.
DOI
|
29 |
Kim, Y., J. Rhie, T. S. Kang, K. H. Kim, M. Kim, and S.J. Lee, 2016a. The 12 September 2016 Gyeongju earthquakes: 1. Observation and remaining questions, Geosciences Journal, 20(6): 747-752.
DOI
|
30 |
Park, J., 2012. An assessment of seismic disaster risk for the Seoul, metropolitan city, University of Seoul, Seoul, KOR.
|
31 |
Sevgen, E., S. Kocaman, H. A. Nefeslioglu, and C. Gokceoglu, 2019. A novel performance assessment approach using photogrammetric techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping with logistic regression, ANN and random forest, Sensors, 19(18): 3940.
DOI
|
32 |
Rezaie, F. and M. Panahi, 2015. GIS Modeling of Seismic Vulnerability of Residential Fabrics Considering Geotechnical, Structural, Social and Physical Distance Indicators in Tehran using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci, 15: 461-474.
DOI
|
33 |
Saaty, T. L., 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3): 234-281.
DOI
|
34 |
Sahin, E. K., I. Colkesen, S. S. Acmali, A. Akgun, and A. C. Aydinoglu, 2020. Developing comprehensive geocomputation tools for landslide susceptibility mapping: LSM tool pack, Computers & Geosciences, 144: 104592.
DOI
|
35 |
Vapnik, V., 1995, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer, New York, NY, USA.
|
36 |
Vapnik, V., 1998. Statistical learning theory, Wiley, New York, NY, USA.
|
37 |
Yariyan, P., M. Avand, F. Soltani, O. Ghorbanzadeh, and T. Blaschke, 2020. Earthquake vulnerability mapping using different hybrid models, Symmetry, 12(3): 405.
DOI
|