Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2020.36.4.7

Prediction of Daily PM10 Concentration for Air Korea Stations Using Artificial Intelligence with LDAPS Weather Data, MODIS AOD, and Chinese Air Quality Data  

Jeong, Yemin (Department of Spatial Information Engineering, Pukyong National University)
Youn, Youjeong (Major of Spatial Information Engineering, Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Pukyong National University)
Cho, Subin (Major of Spatial Information Engineering, Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Pukyong National University)
Kim, Seoyeon (Major of Spatial Information Engineering, Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Pukyong National University)
Huh, Morang (Nano Weather Incorporation)
Lee, Yangwon (Major of Spatial Information Engineering, Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Pukyong National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Remote Sensing / v.36, no.4, 2020 , pp. 573-586 More about this Journal
Abstract
PM (particulate matter) is of interest to everyone because it can have adverse effects on human health by the infiltration from respiratory to internal organs. To date, many studies have made efforts for the prediction of PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations. Unlike previous studies, we conducted the prediction of tomorrow's PM10 concentration for the Air Korea stations using Chinese PM10 data in addition to the satellite AOD and weather variables. We constructed 230,639 matchups from the raw data over 3 million and built an RF (random forest) model from the matchups to cope with the complexity and nonlinearity. The validation statistics from the blind test showed excellent accuracy with the RMSE (root mean square error) of 9.905 ㎍/㎥ and the CC (correlation coefficient) of 0.918. Moreover, our prediction model showed a stable performance without the dependency on seasons or the degree of PM10 concentration. However, part of coastal areas had a relatively low accuracy, which implies that a dedicated model for coastal areas will be necessary. Additional input variables such as wind direction, precipitation, and air stability should also be incorporated into the prediction model as future work.
Keywords
Air pollution; PM10; Artificial intelligence;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 9  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ali, J., R. Khan, N. Ahmad, and I. Maqsood, 2012. Random forests and decision trees, International Journal of Computer Science, 9(5): 272-278.
2 Asadollahfardi, G., H. Zangooei, and S.H. Aria, 2016. Predicting PM2.5 concentrations using artificial neural networks and Markov chain, a case study Karaj city, Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment, 10(2): 67-79.   DOI
3 Athira, V., P. Geetha, R. Vinayakumar, K.P. Soman, 2018. DeepAirNet: applying recurrent networks for air quality prediction, Procedia Computer Science, 132: 1394-1403.   DOI
4 Cha, J.W. and J.Y. Kim, 2018. Analysis of fine dust correlation between air quality and meteorological factors using SPSS, Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, 22(5): 722-727 (in Korean with English abstract).   DOI
5 Cho, C.B., Y.S. Chun, B.Y. Ku, S.U. Park, S.S. Lee, and Y.A. Chung, 2007. Comparison of ADAM's (Asian Dust Aerosol Model) results with observed PM10 data, Journal of the Korean Meteorological Society, 17(1): 87-99 (in Korean with English abstract).   DOI
6 Cho, K.W., Y.J. Jung, C.G. Kang, and C.H. Oh, 2019. Conformity assessment of machine learning algorithm for particulate matter prediction, Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, 23(1): 20-26 (in Korean with English abstract).   DOI
7 Cho, K.H., B.Y. Lee, M.H. Kwon, and S.C. Kim, 2019. Air quality prediction using a deep neural network model, Journal of Korea Society for Atmospheric Environment, 35(2): 214-225 (in Korean with English abstract).   DOI
8 Cho, K.H., Y.J. Jung, J.S. Lee, and C.H. Oh, 2020. Separation prediction model by concentration based on deep neural network for improving PM10 forecast accuracy, Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, 24(1): 8-14 (in Korean with English abstract).
9 Choubin, B., M. Abdolshahnejad, E. Moradi, X. Querol, A. Mosavi, S. Shamshirband, and P. Ghamisi, 2020. Spatial hazard assessment of the PM10 using machine learning models in Barcelona, Spain, Science of the Total Environment, 701: 134474.   DOI
10 Du, C., S. Liu, X. Yu, X. Li, C. Chen, Y. Peng, Y. Dong, Z. Dong, and F. Wang, 2013. Urban boundary layer height characteristics and relationship with particulate matter mass concentrations in Xi'an, central China, Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 13(5): 1598-1607.   DOI
11 Geis, A., M. Wiegner, B. Bonn, K. Schaer, R. Forkel, E. von Schneidemesser, C. Munkel, K.L. Chan, and R. Nothard, 2017. Mixing layer height as an indicator for urban air quality?, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 10(8): 2969-2988.   DOI
12 Grivas, G. and A. Chaloulakou, 2006. Artificial neural network models for prediction of PM10 hourly concentrations, in the Greater Area of Athens, Greece, Atmospheric Environment, 40(7): 1216-1229.   DOI
13 Gupta, P. and S.A. Christopher, 2009. Particulate matter air quality assessment using integrated surface, satellite, and meteorological products: 2. A neural network approach, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 114: D20205.   DOI
14 Jo, Y.J., H.J. Lee, L.S. Chang, and C.H. Kim, 2017. Sensitivity study of the initial meteorological fields on the PM10 concentration predictions using CMAQ modeling, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 33(6): 554-569 (in Korean with English abstract).   DOI
15 Lee, K.H., D.H. Lee, and Y.J. Kim, 2006. Application of MODIS satellite observation data for air quality forecast, Journal of Korea Society for Atmospheric Environment, 22(6): 851-862 (in Korean with English abstract).
16 Kim, J.H., D.R. Choi, Y.S. Koo, J.B. Lee, and H.J. Park, 2016. Analysis of domestic and foreign contributions using DDM in CMAQ during particulate matter episode period of February 2014 in Seoul, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 32(1): 82-99 (in Korean with English abstract).   DOI
17 Kim, N., S. Na, C. Park, M. Huh, J. Oh, K. Ha, J. Cho, and Y. Lee, 2020. An artificial intelligence approach to prediction of corn yields under extreme weather conditions using satellite and meteorological data, Applied Sciences, 10(11): 3785.   DOI
18 Kim, S.B., K. Yumimoto, I. Uno, and Y. Chun, 2011. Dust model intercomparison between ADAM and CFORS/Dust for Asian dust case in 2007 (March 28 - April 3), Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere, 7A: 25-28.
19 Kwon, J.H., Y.J. Lim, and H.S. Oh, 2015. Particulate matter prediction using quantile boosting, Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 28(1): 83-92 (in Korean with English abstract).   DOI
20 Lee, D.W. and S.W. Lee, 2020. Hourly prediction of particulate matter (PM2.5) concentration using time series data and random forest, Korea Information Processing Society Transactions on Software and Data Engineering, 9(4): 129-136 (in Korean with English abstract).
21 Li, Z., J. Guo, A. Ding, H. Liao, J. Liu, Y. Sun, T. Wang, H. Xue, H. Zhang, and B. Zhu, 2017. Aerosol and boundary-layer interactions and impact on air quality, National Science Review, 4(6): 810-833.   DOI
22 Kim, Y.P., 2006. Air pollution in Seoul caused by aerosols, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 22(5): 535-553 (in Korean with English abstract).
23 Miao, Y. and S. Liu, 2019. Linkages between aerosol pollution and planetary boundary layer structure in China, Science of Total Environment, 650: 288-296.   DOI
24 Miri, M., Y. Ghassounb, A. Dovlatabadi, A. Ebrahimnejad, and M.O. Lowner, 2019. Estimate annual and seasonal PM1, PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations using land use regression model, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 174: 137-145.   DOI
25 Moon, Y.S., Y.S. Koo, and O.J. Jung, 2014. Analysis of sensitivity to prediction of particulate matters and related meteorological fields using the WRF-Chem model during Asian dust episode days, Korean Earth Science Society, 35(1): 1-18 (in Korean with English abstract).   DOI
26 Pielke, R.A. and B.P. Hayden, 2020. Planetary boundary layer, available at https://www.britannica.com/science/planetary-boundary-layer, Accessed on Aug. 19, 2020.
27 WHO, 2018. WHO Global Ambient Air Quality Database, available at https://www.who.int/airpollution/data/en/, Accessed on Aug. 19, 2020.
28 Saide, P.E., G.R. Carmichael, S.N. Spak, L. Gallardo, A.E. Osses, M.A. Mena-Carrasco, and M. Pagowski, 2011. Forecasting urban PM10 and PM2.5 pollution episodes in very stable nocturnal conditions and complex terrain using WRF-Chem CO tracer model, Atmospheric Environment, 45(16): 2769-2780.   DOI
29 Seinfeld, J. H. and S. N. Pandis, 2006. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
30 Sohn, K.T., M. Ha, and S.H. Lee, 2016. Prediction model of PM10 concentration over Seoul using CMAQ forecasts, Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 18(6): 3001-3009 (in Korean with English abstract).
31 Wu, X., Y. Wang, S. He, and Z. Wu, 2020. PM2.5/ PM10 ratio prediction based on a long shortterm memory neural network in Wuhan, China, Geoscientific Model Development, 13(3): 1499-1511.   DOI