Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2018.34.1.11

Evaluating the Performance of Four Selections in Genetic Algorithms-Based Multispectral Pixel Clustering  

Kutubi, Abdullah Al Rahat (Department of Applied Information Technology, Graduate School, Kookmin University)
Hong, Min-Gee (Department of Applied Information Technology, Graduate School, Kookmin University)
Kim, Choen (Department of Forest Resources, College of Science and Technology, Kookmin University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Remote Sensing / v.34, no.1, 2018 , pp. 151-166 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper compares the four selections of performance used in the application of genetic algorithms (GAs) to automatically optimize multispectral pixel cluster for unsupervised classification from KOMPSAT-3 data, since the selection among three main types of operators including crossover and mutation is the driving force to determine the overall operations in the clustering GAs. Experimental results demonstrate that the tournament selection obtains a better performance than the other selections, especially for both the number of generation and the convergence rate. However, it is computationally more expensive than the elitism selection with the slowest convergence rate in the comparison, which has less probability of getting optimum cluster centers than the other selections. Both the ranked-based selection and the proportional roulette wheel selection show similar performance in the average Euclidean distance using the pixel clustering, even the ranked-based is computationally much more expensive than the proportional roulette. With respect to finding global optimum, the tournament selection has higher potential to reach the global optimum prior to the ranked-based selection which spends a lot of computational time in fitness smoothing. The tournament selection-based clustering GA is used to successfully classify the KOMPSAT-3 multispectral data achieving the sufficient the matic accuracy assessment (namely, the achieved Kappa coefficient value of 0.923).
Keywords
Clustering genetic algorithms (GAs); Tournament selection; Proportional roulette wheel selection; Elitism selection; Ranked-based selection;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Baker, J. E., 1985. Adaptive selection methods for genetic algorithms, Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, pp. 101-111.
2 Bandyopadhyay, S. and S. K. Pal, 2001. Pixel classification using variable string genetic algorithms with chromosome differentiation, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(2): 303-308.   DOI
3 Blickle, T. and L. Thiele, 1995. A comparison of selection schemes used in genetic algorithms, TIK-Report Nr. 11, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.
4 Chudasama, C., S. M. Shah, and M. Panchal, 2011. Comparison of parents selection methods of genetic algorithm for TSP, IJCA Proc. on International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks CSI-COMNET-2011, pp. 85-87.
5 Goldberg, D. E., 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA.
6 Goldberg, D. E. and K. Deb, 1991. A comparative analysis of selection schemes used in genetic algorithms, in: Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, USA, pp. 69-93.
7 Greffenstette, J. J., 1994. Evolutionary algorithms in robotics, in: Robotics and Manufacturing: Recent Trends in Research, Education, and Application: Proc. ISRAM' 94, ASME Press, New York, USA, vol.5, pp. 65-72.
8 Greffenstette, J., 1997. Proportional selection and sampling algorithms, in: Handbook of Evolutionary Computation, Institute of Physics, Bristol, UK, pp. C2.2:1-C2.2:7.
9 Holland, J. H., 1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, USA.
10 Guo, Y. Q., B. Y. Wu, Z. H. Ju, W. Jun, and Z. Luyan, 2010. Remote sensing image classification by the chaos genetic algorithm in monitoring land use changes, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 51(11-12): 1408-1416.   DOI
11 Jadaan, O. A., L. Rajamani, and C. R. Rao, 2008. Improved selection operator for GA, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 4(4): 269-277.
12 Julstrom, B. A., 1999. It's all the same me: revisiting rank-based probabilities and tournaments, Proc. CEC 99, vol.2, pp.1501-1505.
13 Mitrakis, N. E., C. A. Topalogou, T. K. Alexandridis, J. B. Theocharis, and G. C. Zalidis, 2008. Decision fusion of GA self-organizing neurofuzzy multilayered classifiers for land cover classification using textural and spectral features, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(7): 2137-2152.   DOI
14 Luo, Y.-M. and M. H. Liao, 2014. A clonal selection algorithm for classification of mangroves remote sensing image, International Journal of control and Automation, 7(4): 395-404.   DOI
15 Maulik, U. and S. Bandyopadhyay, 2003. Fuzzy partitioning using a real-coded variablelength genetic algorithm for pixel classification, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(5): 1075-1081.   DOI
16 Miller, B. L. and D. E. Goldberg, 1995. Genetic algorithms, tournament selection, and the effects of noise, Complex Systems, 9: 193-212.
17 Pandey, H. M., 2016. Performance evaluation of selection methods of genetic algorithm and network security concerns, Procedia Computer Science, 78: 13-18.   DOI
18 Shukla, A., H. M. Pandey, and D. Mehrotra, 2015. Comparative review of selection techniques in genetic algorithm, in: Futuristic Trends on Computational Analysis and Knowledge Management (ABLAZE), IEEE, pp. 515-519.
19 Pedergnana, M., P. R. Marpu, D. M. Mura, J. A. Benediktsson, and L. A. Bruzzone, 2013. A novel technique for optimal feature selection in attribute profiles based on genetic algorithms, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51(6): 3514-3528.   DOI
20 Razali, N. M. and J. Geraghty, 2011. Genetic algorithm performance with different selection strategies in solving TSP, Proc. WCE 2011, IAENG, vol. 2, pp. 1134-1139.
21 Yao, H. B. and L. Tian, 2003. A genetic-algorithm-based selective principal component analysis (GA-SPCA) method for high dimensional data feature extraction, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(6): 1469-1478.   DOI
22 Yeom, J. M., C. G. Jin, D. H. Lee, and K. S. Han, 2016. Radiometric characteristics of KOMPSAT-3 multispectral images using the spectra of well-known surface tarps, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(10): 5914-5924.   DOI
23 Zhang, J., X. Hu, J. Zhang, and M. Gu, 2005. Comparison of performance between different selection strategies on simple genetic algorithms, Proc. CIMCA-IAWTIC'05, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, vol. 2, pp. 1115-1121.