Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2018.34.1.10

An Assessment of a Random Forest Classifier for a Crop Classification Using Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery  

Jeon, Woohyun (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University)
Kim, Yongil (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Remote Sensing / v.34, no.1, 2018 , pp. 141-150 More about this Journal
Abstract
Crop type classification is essential for supporting agricultural decisions and resource monitoring. Remote sensing techniques, especially using hyperspectral imagery, have been effective in agricultural applications. Hyperspectral imagery acquires contiguous and narrow spectral bands in a wide range. However, large dimensionality results in unreliable estimates of classifiers and high computational burdens. Therefore, reducing the dimensionality of hyperspectral imagery is necessary. In this study, the Random Forest (RF) classifier was utilized for dimensionality reduction as well as classification purpose. RF is an ensemble-learning algorithm created based on the Classification and Regression Tree (CART), which has gained attention due to its high classification accuracy and fast processing speed. The RF performance for crop classification with airborne hyperspectral imagery was assessed. The study area was the cultivated area in Chogye-myeon, Habcheon-gun, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea, where the main crops are garlic, onion, and wheat. Parameter optimization was conducted to maximize the classification accuracy. Then, the dimensionality reduction was conducted based on RF variable importance. The result shows that using the selected bands presents an excellent classification accuracy without using whole datasets. Moreover, a majority of selected bands are concentrated on visible (VIS) region, especially region related to chlorophyll content. Therefore, it can be inferred that the phenological status after the mature stage influences red-edge spectral reflectance.
Keywords
Crop type classification; Hyperspectral imagery; Random Forest; Parameter optimization; Out-Of-Bag error; Variable importance;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Abdel-Rahman, E. M., O. Mutanga, E. Adam, and R. Ismail, 2014. Detecting Sirex noctilio greyattacked and lightning-struck pine trees using airborne hyperspectral data, random forest and support vector machines classifiers, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 88: 48-59.   DOI
2 Adam, E., O. Mutanga, J. Odindi, and E. M. Abdel-Rahman, 2014. Land-use/cover classification in a heterogeneous coastal landscape using RapidEye imagery: evaluating the performance of random forest and support vector machines classifiers, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 35(10): 3440-3458.   DOI
3 Adam, E. M., O. Mutanga, D. Rugege, and R. Ismail, 2012. Discriminating the papyrus vegetation (Cyperus papyrus L.) and its co-existent species using random forest and hyperspectral data resampled to HYMAP, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 33(2): 552-569.   DOI
4 Akar, O. and O. Gungor, 2013. Classification of multispectral images using Random Forest algorithm, Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation, 1(2).
5 Archibald, R. and G. Fann, 2007. Feature selection and classification of hyperspectral images with support vector machines, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 4(4): 674-677.   DOI
6 Belgiu, M. and L. Dragut, 2016. Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 114: 24-31.   DOI
7 Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests, Machine Learning, 45(1): 5-32.   DOI
8 Chan, J. C. W. and D. Paelinckx, 2008. Evaluation of Random Forest and Adaboost tree-based ensemble classification and spectral band selection for ecotope mapping using airborne hyperspectral imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(6): 2999-3011.   DOI
9 Chutia, D., D. K. Bhattacharyya, K. K. Sarma, R. Kalita, and S. Sudhakar, 2016. Hyperspectral remote sensing classifications: a perspective survey, Transactions in GIS, 20(4): 463-490.   DOI
10 Dye, M., O. Mutanga, and R. Ismail, 2011. Examining the utility of random forest and AISA Eagle hyperspectral image data to predict Pinus patula age in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa,Geocarto International, 26(4): 275-289.   DOI
11 Lawrence, R. L., S. D. Wood, and R. L. Sheley, 2006. Mapping invasive plants using hyperspectral imagery and Breiman Cutler classifications (RandomForest), Remote Sensing of Environment, 100(3): 356-362.   DOI
12 Hao, P., Y. Zhan, L. Wang, Z. Niu, and M. Shakir, 2015. Feature selection of time series MODIS data for early crop classification using random forest: A case study in Kansas, USA, Remote Sensing, 7(5): 5347-5369.   DOI
13 Hsu, P. H., 2007. Feature extraction of hyperspectral images using wavelet and matching pursuit, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 62(2): 78-92.   DOI
14 Kim, H. O. and J. M. Yeom, 2014. Effect of red-edge and texture features for object-based paddy rice crop classification using RapidEye multispectral satellite image data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 35(19): 7046-7068.
15 Low, F., U. Michel, S. Dech, and C. Conrad, 2013. Impact of feature selection on the accuracy and spatial uncertainty of per-field crop classification using support vector machines, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 85: 102-119.   DOI
16 Mulla, D. J., 2013. Twenty five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: Key advances and remaining knowledge gaps, Biosystems Engineering, 114(4): 358-371.   DOI
17 Ok, A. O., O. Akar, and O. Gungor, 2012. Evaluation of random forest method for agricultural crop classification, European Journal of Remote Sensing, 45(1): 421-432.   DOI
18 Pal, M., 2005. Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(1): 217-222.   DOI
19 Pal, M. and G. M. Foody, 2010. Feature selection for classification of hyperspectral data by SVM, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(5): 2297-2307.   DOI
20 Sahoo, R. N., S. S. Ray, and K. R. Manjunath, 2015. Hyperspectral remote sensing of agriculture, Current Science, 108(5): 848-859.
21 Sonobe, R., H. Tani, X. Wang, N. Kobayashi, and H. Shimamura, 2014. Random forest classification of crop type using multi-temporal TerraSAR-X dual-polarimetric data, Remote Sensing Letters, 5(2): 157-164.   DOI
22 Tatsumi, K., Y. Yamashiki, M. A. C. Torres, and C. L. R. Taipe, 2015. Crop classification of upland fields using Random forest of time-series Landsat 7 ETM+ data, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 115: 171-179.   DOI
23 Thenkabail, P. S., E. A. Enclona, M. S. Ashton, and B. Van Der Meer, 2004. Accuracy assessments of hyperspectral waveband performance for vegetation analysis applications, Remote Sensing of Environment, 91(3): 354-376.   DOI
24 Thenkabail, P. S. and J. G. Lyon (Eds.)., 2016. Hyperspectral remote sensing of vegetation, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, US.
25 Waske, B., S. van der Linden, C. Oldenburg, B. Jakimow, A. Rabe, and P. Hostert, 2012. ImageRF-A user-oriented implementation for remote sensing image analysis with Random Forests, Environmental modelling & software, 35: 192-193.   DOI
26 Rural Development Administration (RDA), 2007. Schedule of farm work: Onion, Garlic, Wheat (e-book), http://www.nongsaro.go.kr, Accessed on Feb. 1, 2017.