Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2017.33.3.8

Quality Consistence Analysis of Satellite-based Sea Ice Concentration Products  

Lee, Eunkyung (Division of Earth Environmental System Science (Major of Spatial Information Engineering), Pukyong National University)
Seo, Minji (Division of Earth Environmental System Science (Major of Spatial Information Engineering), Pukyong National University)
Lee, Kyeong-sang (Division of Earth Environmental System Science (Major of Spatial Information Engineering), Pukyong National University)
Choi, Sungwon (Division of Earth Environmental System Science (Major of Spatial Information Engineering), Pukyong National University)
Lee, Darae (Division of Earth Environmental System Science (Major of Spatial Information Engineering), Pukyong National University)
Jin, Donghyun (Division of Earth Environmental System Science (Major of Spatial Information Engineering), Pukyong National University)
Kwon, Chaeyoung (Division of Earth Environmental System Science (Major of Spatial Information Engineering), Pukyong National University)
Kim, Honghee (Division of Earth Environmental System Science (Major of Spatial Information Engineering), Pukyong National University)
Huh, Morang (P.K SYSTEM Inc.)
Han, Kyung-Soo (Division of Earth Environmental System Science (Major of Spatial Information Engineering), Pukyong National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Remote Sensing / v.33, no.3, 2017 , pp. 333-338 More about this Journal
Abstract
We compared sea ice concentration(SIC) and sea ice extent(SIE) using EUMETSAT Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Application Facilities(OSI SAF) and NASA Team(NT) sea ice algorithm in the Arctic during 1980-2010 to investigate the difference between sea ice data applied different algorithms. SIC and SIE of the two data showed different consistency by season and by sea area. Seasonally, SIC of OSI SAF was 0.85 % overall, 0.48 % in spring, 0.97 % in summer, 1.38 % in autumn and 0.66 % in winter higher than NT SIC. By sea area, OSI SAF SIC was 2.7 %, SIE was $198,000km^2$ higher than NT in Arctic Ocean, but in Lincoln Sea, OSI SAF SIC was 2.3 %, SIE was $20,000km^2$ lower than NT.
Keywords
Sea ice concentration; Sea ice extent; OSI SAF; NASA Team;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Deser, C., and H. Teng, 2008. Evolution of Arctic sea ice concentration trends and the role of atmospheric circulation forcing, 1979-2007, Geophysical Research Letters, 35(2).
2 Eastwood, S., T. Lavergne, and R. Tonboe, 2014. Algorithm theoretical basis document for the OSI SAF global reprocessed sea ice concentration product, EUMETSAT Network Satellite Application Facilities.
3 Gloersen, P. and D. J. Cavalieri, 1986. Reduction of weather effects in the calculation of sea ice concentration from microwave radiances, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 91(C3): 3913-3919.   DOI
4 Honda, M., J. Inoue and S. Yamane, 2009. Influence of low Arctic sea-ice minima on anomalously cold Eurasian winters, Geophysical Research Letters, 36(8).
5 Liu, J., J. A. Curry, H. Wang, M. Song and R. M. Horton, 2012. Impact of declining Arctic sea ice on winter snowfall, Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(11): 4074-4079.   DOI
6 Lupkes, C., T. Vihma, G. Birnbaum, and U. Wacker, 2008. Influence of leads in sea ice on the temperature of the atmospheric boundary layer during polar night, Geophysical Research Letters, 35(3).
7 Parkinson, C. L., D. Rind, R. J. Healy, and D. G. Martinson, 2001. The impact of sea ice concentration accuracies on climate model simulations with the GISS GCM, Journal of Climate, 14(12): 2606-2623.   DOI
8 Uiboupin, R., L. Axell, U. Raudsepp, and L. Sipelgas, 2010. Comparison of operational ice charts with satellite based ice concentration products in the Baltic Sea, Proc. of 2010 IEEE/OES US/EU Baltic International Symposium (BALTIC), Riga, Latvia, Aug. 25-27, pp. 1-8.
9 Vancoppenolle, M., K. M. Meiners, C. Michel, L. Bopp, F. Brabant, G. Carnat, B. Delille. D. Lannuzel, G. Madec, S. Moreau J. L. Tison and P. Merwe, 2013. Role of sea ice in global biogeochemical cycles: emerging views and challenges, Quaternary science reviews, 79: 207-230.   DOI
10 Andersen, S., R. T. Tonboe and L. Kaleschke, 2006. Artic Sea Ice Thickness: Past, Present and Future, Proc. of International Workshop on Arctic Sea Ice Thickness : Past, Present and future, Rungsted, Denmark, Nov. 8-9, pp. 104-112.
11 Comiso, J. C., and F. Nishio, 2008. Trends in the sea ice cover using enhanced and compatible AMSR-E, SSM/I, and SMMR data, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 113(C2).
12 Bjorgo, E., O. M. Johannessen, and M. W. Miles, 1997. Analysis of merged SMMR?SSMI time series of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice parameters 1978-1995, Geophysical Research Letters, 24(4): 413-416.   DOI
13 Cavalieri, D. J., J. P. Crawford, M. R. Drinkwater, D. T. Eppler, L. D. Farmer, R. R. Jentz and C. C. Wackerman, 1991. Aircraft active and passive microwave validation of sea ice concentration from the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program Special Sensor Microwave Imager, Journal of Geophysical research, 96(C12): 21989-22008.   DOI
14 Comiso, J. C., 2010. Variability and trends of the global sea ice cover, Sea ice, 2: 205-246.