Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2015.31.6.9

Investigation of SO2 effect on OMI-TOMS and OMI-DOAS O3 in volcanic areas with OMI satellite data  

Choi, Wonei (Department of Spatial Information Engineering, Pukyong National University)
Hong, Hyunkee (Department of Spatial Information Engineering, Pukyong National University)
Park, Junsung (Department of Spatial Information Engineering, Pukyong National University)
Kim, Daewon (Department of Spatial Information Engineering, Pukyong National University)
Yeo, Jaeho (Department of Spatial Information Engineering, Pukyong National University)
Lee, Hanlim (Department of Spatial Information Engineering, Pukyong National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Remote Sensing / v.31, no.6, 2015 , pp. 599-608 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this present study, we quantified the $SO_2$ effect on $O_3$ retrieval from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) measurement. The difference between OMI-Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) and OMI-Differential Optical Absorption Spectrometer (DOAS) total $O_3$ is calculated in high $SO_2$ volcanic plume on several volcanic eruptions (Anatahan, La Cumbre, Sierra Negra, and Piton) from 2005 through 2008. There is a certain correlation ($R{\geq}0.5$) between the difference and $OMI-SO_2$ in volcanic plumes and the significant difference close to 100 DU. The high $SO_2$ condition found to affect TOMS $O_3$ retrieval significantly due to a strong $SO_2$ absorption at the TOMS $O_3$ retrieval wavelengths. Besides, we calculated the difference against various $SO_2$ levels. There is the considerable difference (average = 32.9 DU; standard deviation = 13.5 DU) in the high $OMI-SO_2$ condition ($OMI-SO_2{\geq}7.0DU$). We also found that the rate of change in the difference per 1.0 DU change in middle troposphere (TRM) and upper troposphere and stratosphere (STL) $SO_2$ columns are 3.9 DU and 4.9 DU, respectively.
Keywords
Ozone; OMI; TOMS; DOAS; Sulfur dioxide;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Anton, M., M. Lopez, J. Vilaplana, M. Kroon, R. McPeters, M. Banon, and A. Serrano, 2009. Validation of OMI-TOMS and OMI-DOAS total ozone column using five Brewer spectroradiometers at the Iberian peninsula. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984-2012), 114(D14).
2 Balis, D., M. Kroon, M. Koukouli, E. Brinksma, G. Labow, J. Veefkind, and R. McPeters, 2007. Validation of Ozone Monitoring Instrument total ozone column measurements using Brewer and Dobson spectrophotometer ground-based observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984-2012), 112(D24).
3 Bhartia, P., 2002. OMI Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document. Volume II, OMI Ozone Products. NASA-OMI, Washington, DC, USA
4 Bracher, A., L. Lamsal, M. Weber, K. Bramstedt, M. Coldewey-Egbers, and J. Burrows, 2005. Global satellite validation of SCIAMACHY O 3 columns with GOME WFDOAS. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 5, 2357-2368.   DOI
5 Bramstedt, K., J. Gleason, D. Loyola, W. Thomas, A. Bracher, M. Weber, and J. Burrows, 2003. Comparison of total ozone from the satellite instruments GOME and TOMS with measurements from the Dobson network 1996-2000. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 3, 1409-1419.   DOI
6 Buchard, V., C. Brogniez, F. Auriol, B. Bonnel, J. Lenoble, A. Tanskanen, B. Bojkov, and P. veefkind, 2008. Comparison of OMI ozone and UV irradiance data with ground-based measurements at two French sites. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 8: 4517-4528.   DOI
7 De Backer, H. and D. De Muer, 1991. Intercomparison of total ozone data measured with Dobson and Brewer ozone spectrophotometers at Uccle (Belgium) from January 1984 to March 1991, including zenith sky observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984-2012), 96(D11): 20711-20719.   DOI
8 Hong, H., H. Lee, J. Kim, and Y. G. Lee, 2014. First comparison of OMI-DOAS total ozone using ground-based observations at a megacity site in East Asia: Causes of discrepancy and improvement in OMI-DOAS total ozone during summer. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 119: 10058-10067.   DOI
9 Ialongo, I., G. Casale, and A. Siani, 2008. Comparison of total ozone and erythemal UV data from OMI with ground-based measurements at Rome station. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 8: 3283-3289.   DOI
10 Kroon, M., J. P. Veefkind, M. Sneep, R. McPeters, P. Bhartia, and P. Levelt, 2008. Comparing OMI-TOMS and OMI-DOAS total ozone column data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984-2012), 113(D16).
11 Krueger, A. J., 1983. Sighting of El Chichon sulfur dioxide clouds with the Nimbus 7 total ozone mapping spectrometer. Science, 220: 1377-1379.   DOI
12 Liu, X., P. Bhartia, K. Chance, R. Spurr, and T. Kurosu, 2010. Ozone profile retrievals from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10, 2521-2537.   DOI
13 Loyola, D., and M.E. Koukouli, P. Volks, D.S. Balis, N. Hao, M. Van Roozendael, R.J.D. Spurr, W. Zimmer, S. Kiemle, C. Lerot, and J.-C. Lanbert, 2011. The GOME-2 total column ozone product: Retrieval algorithm and ground-based validation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984-2012), 116(D7).
14 McKee, D., 1993. Tropospheric ozone: human health and agricultural impacts, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA
15 McPeters, R., D. Heath, and B. Schlesinger, 1984. Satellite observation of $SO_2$ from El Chichon: Identification and measurement. Geophysical Research Letters, 11: 1203-1206.   DOI
16 McPeters, R., S. Hollandsworth, L. Flynn, J. Herman, and C. Seftor, 1996. Long-term ozone trends derived from the 16-year combined Nimbus 7/Meteor 3 TOMS Version 7 record. Geophysical Research Letters, 23, 3699-3702.   DOI
17 Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M.Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H.L.Miller, 2007. IPCC, Climate change 2007: thephysical science basis. Contribution of workinggroup I to the fourth assessment report of theintergovernmental panel on climate change.,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UnitedKingdom and New York, NY, USA
18 McPeters, R., M. Kroon, G. Labow, E. Brinksma, D. Balis, I. Petropavlovskikh, J.P. Veefkind, P.K. Bhartia, and P.F. Levelt, 2008. Validation of the AURA Ozone Monitoring Instrument total column ozone product. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984-2012), 113(D15).
19 OMI Team, 2009. Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Data User's Guide, OMI-DUG-3.0, NASA, http://so2.umbc.edu/omi/omi docs.html