Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2012.28.6.3

The Impacts of Decomposition Levels in Wavelet Transform on Anomaly Detection from Hyperspectral Imagery  

Yoo, Hee Young (Geoinformatic Engineering Research Institute, Inha University)
Park, No-Wook (Department of Geoinformatic Engineering, Inha University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Remote Sensing / v.28, no.6, 2012 , pp. 623-632 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this paper, we analyzed the effect of wavelet decomposition levels in feature extraction for anomaly detection from hyperspectral imagery. After wavelet analysis, anomaly detection was experimentally performed using the RX detector algorithm to analyze the detecting capabilities. From the experiment for anomaly detection using CASI imagery, the characteristics of extracted features and the changes of their patterns showed that radiance curves were simplified as wavelet transform progresses and H bands did not show significant differences between target anomaly and background in the previous levels. The results of anomaly detection and their ROC curves showed the best performance when using the appropriate sub-band decided from the visual interpretation of wavelet analysis which was L band at the decomposition level where the overall shape of profile was preserved. The results of this study would be used as fundamental information or guidelines when applying wavelet transform to feature extraction and selection from hyperspectral imagery. However, further researches for various anomaly targets and the quantitative selection of optimal decomposition levels are needed for generalization.
Keywords
Hyperspectral image; Discrete wavelet transform; Dimension reduction; Anomaly detection;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Fauvel, M., J. Chanussot, and J.A. Benediktsson, 2009. Kernel principal component analysis for the classi?cation of hyperspectral remotesensing data over urban areas, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2009: 1-14.
2 Gu, Y., Y. Liu, and Y. Zhangm, 2008. A selective KPCA algorithm based on high-order statistics for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 5(1): 43-47.   DOI
3 Igamberdiev, R.M., G. Renzdoerffer, R. Bill, H. Schubert, M. Bachmann, and B. Lennartz, 2011. Determination of chlorophyll content of small water bodies (kettle holes) using hyperspectral airborne data, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 13: 912-921.   DOI
4 Kurz, T.H., J. Dewit, S.J. Buckley, J.B. Thurmond, and D.W. Hunt, 2012. Hyperspectral image analysis of different carbonate lithologies (limestone, karst and hydrothermal dolomites): the Pozalagua Quarry case study (Cantabria, North-west Spain), Sedimentology, 59(2): 623-645.   DOI
5 Kwon, H. and N.M. Nasrabadi, 2005. Kernel RXalgorithm: a nonlinear anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(2): 388- 397.   DOI
6 Muraki, S., 1993. Volume data and wavelet transforms, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 13(4): 50-56.   DOI
7 Park, N.-W., H.Y., Yoo, J-I., Shin, and K.-S., Lee, 2012. Anomaly Detection from Hyperspectral Imagery using Transform-based Feature Selection and Local Spatial Auto-correlation Index, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(4): 357-367.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
8 Reed, I.S. and X. Yu, 1990. Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution. IEEE Transactions on Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing, 38(10): 1760-1770.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Banerjee, A., P. Burlina, and C. Diehl, 2006. A support vector method for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(8): 2282-2291.   DOI
10 Bruce, L.M., C.H. Koger, and J. Li, 2002. Dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral data using discrete wavelet transform feature extraction, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(10): 2331-2338.   DOI
11 Camps-Valls, G. and L. Bruzzone, 2009. Kernel Methods for Remote Sensing Data Analysis, John Wiely &Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK.
12 Chang, C.-I. and S.-S. Chiang, 2002. Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(6): 1314-1325.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Cheung, N., C. Tang, A. Ortega, and C.S. Raghavendra, 2006. Efficient wavelet-based predictive Slepian?.Wolf coding for hyperspectral imagery, Signal Processing, 86(11): 3180-3195.   DOI
14 Cochrane, M.A., 2000. Using vegetation reflectance variability for species level classification of hyperspectral data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(10): 2075-2087.   DOI
15 Daubechies, I., 1998. Orthonormal Bases of Compactly Supported Wavelet, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 41(7): 906-966.
16 Yoo, H.Y., K. Lee, and B.D. Kwon, 2007. Application of the 3D Discrete Wavelet Transformation Scheme to Remotely Sensed Image Classification, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(5): 355-363.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
17 Rodarmel, C. and J. Shan, 2002. Principal Component Analysis for Hyperspectral Image Classification, Surveying and Land Information Systems, 62(2): 115-123.