Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2008.24.5.483

Validation and selection of GCPs obtained from ERS SAR and the SRTM DEM: Application to SPOT DEM Construction  

Jung, Hyung-Sup (Department of Earth System Sciences, Yonsei University)
Hong, Sang-Hoon (Department of Earth System Sciences, Yonsei University)
Won, Joong-Sun (Department of Earth System Sciences, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Remote Sensing / v.24, no.5, 2008 , pp. 483-496 More about this Journal
Abstract
Qualified ground control points (GCPs) are required to construct a digital elevation model (DEM) from a pushbroom stereo pair. An inverse geolocation algorithm for extracting GCPs from ERS SAR data and the SRTM DEM was recently developed. However, not all GCPs established by this method are accurate enough for direct application to the geometric correction of pushbroom images such as SPOT, IRS, etc, and thus a method for selecting and removing inaccurate points from the sets of GCPs is needed. In this study, we propose a method for evaluating GCP accuracy and winnowing sets of GCPs through orientation modeling of pushbroom image and validate performance of this method using SPOT stereo pair of Daejon City. It has been found that the statistical distribution of GCP positional errors is approximately Gaussian without bias, and that the residual errors estimated by orientation modeling have a linear relationship with the positional errors. Inaccurate GCPs have large positional errors and can be iteratively eliminated by thresholding the residual errors. Forty-one GCPs were initially extracted for the test, with mean the positional error values of 25.6m, 2.5m and -6.1m in the X-, Y- and Z-directions, respectively, and standard deviations of 62.4m, 37.6m and 15.0m. Twenty-one GCPs were eliminated by the proposed method, resulting in the standard deviations of the positional errors of the 20 final GCPs being reduced to 13.9m, 8.5m and 7.5m in the X-, Y- and Z-directions, respectively. Orientation modeling of the SPOT stereo pair was performed using the 20 GCPs, and the model was checked against 15 map-based points. The root mean square errors (RMSEs) of the model were 10.4m, 7.1m and 12.1m in X-, Y- and Z-directions, respectively. A SPOT DEM with a 20m ground resolution was successfully constructed using a automatic matching procedure.
Keywords
Qualified GCP; SPOT DEM; inverse geolocation algorithm; ERS SAR; SRTM DEM;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Dare, P. and I. Dowman, 2001. An improved model for automatic feature-based registration of SAR and SPOT images. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 56(1): 13-28   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Lopes, A., E. Nezry, R. Touzi, and H. Laur, 1993. Structure detection and statistical adaptive speckle filtering in SAR images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14(9): 1735-1758   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Rabus, B., M. Eineder, A. Roth and R. Bamler, 2003. The shuttle radar topography mission:a new class of digital elevation models acquired by spaceborne radar. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 57(4): 241-262   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Mikhail, E. M., J. S. Bethel, and J. C. McGlone, 2001. Introduction to Modern Photogrammetry, John Wiley & Sons, New York
5 Chen, L. C. and J. Y. Rau, 1993. A unified solution for digital terrain model and orthoimage generation from SPOT stereopairs. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 31(6): 1243-1252   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Lee, H. S. and N. H. Younan, 2003. DTM extraction of lidar returns via adaptive processing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(1): 2063-2069   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Raucoules, D. and C. Carnec, 1999. Use of interferometric phase for co-registration of ERS SAR and SPOT images. Proceeding of CEOS SAR Workshop, 26-29 October 1999, Toulouse, France, pp.114-118
8 Raillou, P. and M. Gelautz, 1999. Relief reconstruction from SAR stereo pairs: the "optimal gradient" matching method. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37(4): 2099-2107   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Rufino, G., A. Moccia and S. Esposito, 1998. DEM generation by means of ERS tandem data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 36(6): 1905-1912   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Orun, A. B. and K. Natarajan, 1994. A modified bundle adjustment software for SPOT imagery and photography: Tradeoff. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60(12): 1431-1437
11 Toutin, T., D. Hoja, E. Hoeppner, A. Remond, and C. King, 1998. GCPs Selection from Multisource Data Over Mountainous Topography. Proceeding of International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 6-10 July 1998, Seattle, USA, pp.2339-2341
12 Shapiro, S. S. and M. B. Wilk, 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality complete samples. Biometrika, 52: 591-611   DOI
13 Curlander, J. C. and R. N. McDough, 1991. Synthetic Aperture Radar, Systems and Signal Processing, John Wiley & Sons, New York
14 Hong, S. H., H. S. Jung and J. S. Won, 2006. Extraction of ground control points (GCPs) from synthetic aperture radar image and SRTM DEM. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(18): 3813-3829   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Toutin, T., 2000. Stereo-mapping with SPOT-P and ERS-1 SAR images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(8):1657-1674   DOI
16 Olmsted, C., 1993. Alaska SAR Facility Scientific SAR User's Guide, ASF-SD-478
17 Marschalk, U., A. Roth, M. Eineder and S. Suchandt, 2004. Comparison of DEMs derived from SRTM/X- and C-Band. Proceedings of International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 20-24 September 2004, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, pp. 4531-4534
18 Paul, D. and I. Dowman, 2001. An improved model for automatic feature-based registration of SAR and SPOT images. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 56(1): 13-28   DOI   ScienceOn